Man's Search for Meaning film rights lawsuit filed in California federal court
A producer has alleged that she was unfairly pushed out of the project to adapt Viktor Frankl's memoir Man's Search for Meaning into a film.

A lawsuit has been filed by a producer over the film rights to Viktor Frankl's memoir Man's Search for Meaning, alleging that she was unfairly pushed out of the project.
The producer, Marisa Polvino, claims that her former partners, including executive producer Anthony Robbins and producer Kate Cohen, have breached contract and committed fraud by diverting the project's rights and assets away from her production company, OLF Productions. The lawsuit, filed in California federal court on Sunday, names multiple defendants, including MarVista Entertainment and its parent company Fox Entertainment. These parties allegedly helped shift control of the movie away from Polvino.
Man's Search for Meaning is a memoir that recounts Frankl's experiences as a prisoner in Nazi concentration camps during World War II. The book has become a bestseller since its publication in 1946, with over 16 million copies sold worldwide across more than 50 languages. In 2016, Polvino and Cohen acquired the film rights to the memoir from Frankl's estate.
Polvino, along with her former partners, had been developing the movie adaptation of Man's Search for Meaning for several years. The lawsuit seeks a court order restoring Polvino's control over the project and unspecified damages, among other remedies.
The lawsuit claims that the involvement of MarVista in 2024 marked a turning point in the development of the movie, as it entered into a financing agreement with OLF Productions that provided for a shared $300,000 development fund and profit participation.
According to the complaint, shortly after this deal was struck, Cohen allegedly diverted funds meant for the project and shifted key assets, including negotiations for renewing the underlying movie rights, to a new company. This move is seen as a breach of trust by Polvino, who claims that she had not authorized such a transfer.
Polvino alleges that representatives from MarVista and Fox were aware of this dispute but chose to ignore it, allowing development of the screenplay and writer agreements to proceed under a different company. This decision has left her feeling disenfranchised and without control over the project's direction.
The underlying rights to the movie are also at the center of the lawsuit, with Polvino accusing Robbins of acquiring them after they expired in 2024. This move is seen as an attempt by Robbins to cut Polvino out of the project entirely.
MarVista and Fox have since invoked this development as a basis for claiming that OLF Productions was in breach of their deal, allowing them to freely negotiate with Robbins without Polvino's involvement or consent.
Polvino's former partners on the movie have disavowed any involvement or connection to her, according to the lawsuit. This assertion is part of Polvino's broader claim that she has been unfairly stripped of her rights and value in the project.
The suit aims to restore OLF Productions' active status and hold each defendant accountable for their alleged role in profiting from the film without Polvino's involvement or consent, as stated by Jacob Struck, a lawyer representing the producer.
Facts based on reporting originally published by The Hollywood Reporter.
You may republish this story, in full or in part, if you credit Noti Group and link to it (licence CC BY 4.0). Photos are not included.











