Norway's prime minister hailed Tuesday's talks between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and US special envoy Steve Witkoff as "good and constructive. The meeting was part of a wider effort to broker peace, with European representatives also present. However, despite this optimism, the path to a lasting resolution remains uncertain.

The possibility of a trilateral summit between leaders from Ukraine, Russia, and the US has been floated in Oslo. This meeting would bring together President Zelensky, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and US President Donald Trump with the aim of agreeing an end to hostilities. However, this idea has yet to gain traction, particularly given Putin's reluctance to share a table with Zelensky.

The Kremlin has indicated that it may be willing to resume technical-level talks next month in Abu Dhabi, but only if these discussions are limited to lower-ranking officials. This development suggests that Russia is not yet ready to engage in meaningful negotiations with Ukraine and the US.

Russian officials have signaled that they are not yet ready to engage in meaningful negotiations over Ukraine, despite recent diplomatic efforts by the US.

Yuri Ushakov, a foreign policy aide to Vladimir Putin, was unimpressed by the discussions held at the St Petersburg talks, where he met with Steve Witkoff. According to Ushakov, Witkoff shared his views on new approaches from Europe and Kyiv, but these were deemed not useful in resolving the Ukraine crisis.

Ushakov's comments suggest that Russia is not feeling pressured to end the war, despite ongoing efforts by Western nations. He expressed skepticism about the prospects for peace, stating only that things are moving in a positive direction, without providing further clarity.

The Kremlin's stance appears to be buoyed by several factors, including Ukraine's strained air defenses and the approaching winter season, which may provide an opportunity for Russia to gain the upper hand. Additionally, US President Donald Trump's recent actions have been seen as a sign of a desire for improved relations with Moscow, including the easing of sanctions and the purchase of Russian diesel fuel.

The recent diplomatic efforts by the US government have been met with skepticism by many in Ukraine, who see them as a sign that Washington is willing to compromise on key issues related to the conflict.

Russian officials, however, appear to be welcoming these developments, which they believe will ease pressure on President Putin and allow him to maintain his current stance on the war-torn region.

Some analysts have pointed out that Russian MP Evgeny Popov's recent comments suggest a desire for improved relations with Moscow, particularly in light of US President Donald Trump's recent actions, including the easing of sanctions and the purchase of Russian diesel fuel.

These developments have led some to speculate about the possibility of a trilateral meeting between Putin, Zelensky, and Trump, which could potentially bring an end to the conflict, but this seems unlikely given the current state of negotiations.

In contrast, a meeting between Putin, Trump, and Xi Jinping is reportedly being planned for next month on the sidelines of the Apec summit in China, where some commentators have dubbed it The New Yalta" due to its potential implications for global politics.

This gathering would bring together the leaders of three of the world's most powerful nations, with Russian MP Evgeny Popov stating that such a meeting would be beneficial for the entire world.

Such an outcome would put Putin in a strong position, allowing him to take his place at the top table of global politics and potentially secure key concessions from the other two leaders.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm98zn5j89kdo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

A key aide to President Vladimir Putin made this statement after a meeting between the Russian leader's envoy and US special representative Steve Witkoff in St Petersburg. Yuri Ushakov expressed Russia's readiness to restart talks, which have been on hold since February, with the possibility of a new round taking place next month.

Ukraine has been pushing for an immediate resumption of negotiations, but Moscow had previously refused to engage in discussions while it believed itself to be making gains on the battlefield. Ukraine is currently facing severe shortages of interceptors as it struggles to counter Russia's missile attacks, which have caused significant damage and loss of life.

The US envoy, Steve Witkoff, met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky before traveling to St Petersburg for talks with Putin's representative. While the specific proposals brought by Witkoff remain unclear, Zelensky mentioned that discussions had centered around providing strong security guarantees for Ukraine and establishing an energy ceasefire.

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine began in February 2022 when Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukrainian territory. Since then, top officials from all three nations have held several rounds of talks aimed at finding a resolution to the war.

Russian officials have emphasized that any negotiations aimed at ending the conflict must focus on establishing a new security system for Russia and Ukraine once fighting ceases.

US officials have proposed a trilateral meeting between American, Russian, and Ukrainian representatives to facilitate technical discussions on a potential peace agreement. According to sources, this proposal was accepted by both Ukrainian and Russian delegations in separate meetings in Oslo and St Petersburg respectively.

Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov informed reporters that President Putin reiterated his assertion of strategic momentum for Russia's military efforts across the vast front line. However, Ukraine and its European allies have disputed this claim, pointing to a stalemate on the battlefield.

Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky has indicated a willingness to accept a deal that would freeze hostilities along the current front lines as a minimum requirement for Russia. He described such an arrangement as either a ceasefire or a halt in killings, and suggested that security guarantees for Ukraine could be explored after this initial agreement.

US negotiators have characterized the latest round of talks as "constructive, with one participant expressing optimism about the potential for lasting peace, security, and prosperity to emerge from ongoing discussions.

The diplomatic efforts to end the war between Ukraine and Russia continue amidst growing tensions between Kyiv and Washington. The recent round of talks between the two parties was marked by a heated exchange over issues such as intelligence sharing and military aid.

Ukraine has accused the US of withholding critical intelligence that would have allowed them to warn civilians about incoming Russian ballistic missile launches, resulting in significant loss of life. This claim has been strongly denied by US officials, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio calling it scandalous. However, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has stated that the sharing of intelligence is now functioning properly.

Another point of contention between Ukraine and the US is the use of drones in military operations. The Ukrainian military has complained about speed restrictions imposed by Elon Musk's satellite internet network Starlink, which has hindered their ability to conduct strikes against Russia. US officials have denied requesting such a slowdown, and a bipartisan group of senators has called for an investigation into this matter.

The tension between Ukraine and the US comes as President Trump continues to express his views on the conflict. He has stated that it is time for Ukraine to get a new president, implying that the current leadership is not effective in negotiating with Russia. This has sparked criticism from lawmakers who argue that such comments undermine the efforts of Ukrainian leaders.

The controversy surrounding the lifting of sanctions on Russia by President Trump has also raised concerns about the US's commitment to supporting Ukraine. The move allowed Russia to release large quantities of diesel fuel into the global market, fuelling rising fuel prices worldwide. This decision was seen as contradictory to earlier legislation authorizing fresh sanctions and tariffs on nations importing Russian oil and gas.

The release of American citizen Stephen Hubbard has sparked a mix of reactions from US officials, with some praising President Putin for his humanitarian gesture.

Hubbard, 74, was serving nearly seven years in jail for allegedly fighting on behalf of Ukraine when he was freed by Russia ahead of high-level talks between Trump's envoy and the Kremlin leader. The move appears to have smoothed the way for these diplomatic discussions.

US Vice-President JD Vance downplayed the significance of Witkoff's description of Putin as a humanitarian", emphasizing that his job is to secure results, regardless of personal opinions or sentiments towards those he negotiates with.

The release of Hubbard has been seen as a positive development in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, but it remains to be seen whether this goodwill will translate into tangible progress in negotiations to end the war.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq3djn5nxx12o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

A video posted by Zelensky on social media shows him being greeted with a hug by Steve Witkoff, an envoy for the US president, ahead of their talks in Oslo. However, this warm welcome may not have alleviated Zelensky's concerns about the direction of US policy towards Ukraine.

Despite his efforts to project a positive image, Zelensky's message accompanying the video suggests that he still values the support of his international partners. His statement reads: "Ukraine is working for peace. I thank our partners for their support!"

The past ten days have seen a significant deterioration in relations between Trump and Zelensky, with both sides engaging in public criticism of each other.

Trump's comments about Zelensky have been particularly scathing, with the US president reportedly describing him as "not a good guy to deal with.

The relationship between Trump and Zelensky appears increasingly strained despite the optimism surrounding their meeting in Oslo. Experts are warning that the US president's recent comments about Ukraine may be a sign of deeper issues.

Zelensky has been careful not to directly criticize his American counterpart, but he has expressed frustration with the lack of progress on key issues. In a recent address to a congressional delegation, he acknowledged decisions on the American side that are difficult to understand and hinted at concerns about slowing down support for Ukraine.

The tension between Trump and Zelensky is not new, dating back to their infamous Oval Office confrontation in February 2025. Following this incident, the US suspended military aid and restricted intelligence sharing with Ukraine. However, a mechanism was later established for European countries to fund American equipment for Ukraine, alleviating some of the pressure.

The crisis has had significant consequences for Ukraine's ability to defend itself against Russian aggression. The country is currently facing a severe shortage of US-made Patriot air defence missiles, which are crucial in shooting down Russian ballistic missiles. With supplies dwindling, Kyiv is struggling to protect its citizens from the ongoing threat of missile attacks.

The Ukrainian government is facing a critical shortage of Patriot interceptors, which are crucial in defending against Russian missile attacks. According to an unnamed official, the country's stockpile has dwindled to just a couple of interceptors.

This alarming development comes as Ukraine struggles to protect its citizens from ongoing threats. The lack of effective defense systems has left Kyiv vulnerable to repeated missile strikes, causing significant concern among government officials and residents alike.

The Trump administration has been accused of slowing down the process for US allies to transfer their Patriot stocks to Ukraine. This move is seen as a hindrance in bolstering the country's defenses against Russian aggression.

The situation on the ground remains increasingly dire, with Kyiv struggling to cope with the consequences of Russia's military actions. The city is under constant threat from missile attacks, and the lack of adequate defense systems has left residents living in fear.

The US administration's actions have been met with criticism from former diplomats and officials who claim that Washington is prioritizing its relations with Moscow over Kyiv. This assessment comes as the Trump administration has been accused of providing concessions to Russia while imposing restrictions on Ukraine.

Russian officials have welcomed the recent diplomatic efforts, hailing them as a return to the spirit of Alaska, a phrase coined after the 2025 summit between Trump and Putin in Anchorage. The move is seen as a significant shift in tone from Washington's previous stance towards Moscow.

The US has been accused of restricting the flow of intelligence and interfering with Ukraine's access to Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service, although these claims have not been confirmed by Washington. This development has sparked concerns that the Trump administration is turning its back on Ukraine at a critical juncture in the conflict.

As Russia escalates its drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities, Kyiv has complained about the lack of advance warning provided by US satellite intelligence. The city's residents have expressed frustration over the delayed air raid alerts and mobile warnings, which were reportedly triggered after Russian missiles had already hit their targets.

The recent surge in attacks by advanced, jet-powered drones has put a significant strain on Ukraine's defenses since the summer months.

It remains unclear where the decision to limit Ukraine's use of Starlink or its military-grade equivalent, Starshield, originated from within the US administration.

According to Reuters, reports indicate that this directive came from the White House, sparking widespread speculation about the motivations behind such a move.

The lack of transparency surrounding this issue has led many to question the intentions of those in power, fueling ongoing tensions between the US and Ukraine.

The trust deficit between the two nations is a long-standing concern, with much of it stemming from Donald Trump's perceived distrust of Ukraine as a whole.

The diplomatic efforts in Oslo have yielded some positive developments, but it remains to be seen whether they will translate into concrete results on the ground.

Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre expressed optimism about the talks, stating that they had helped to straighten out a few things" and pave the way for further progress. However, the underlying issues between Ukraine and the US appear to run deep, with both sides still far apart on key issues.

The Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has indicated that some of the outstanding issues have been resolved, including the matter of early warning systems and the provision of Patriot missiles and Starlink technology. Despite this, his tone remains cautious, and it is clear that significant work remains to be done to rebuild trust between the two nations.

The situation is now set to unfold in St Petersburg, where Ukrainian officials will present updated proposals to Russian leaders. The success or failure of these talks will likely have far-reaching implications for the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, and the relationship between Ukraine and the US.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckrey51jrgnro?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The talks are set to take place in Oslo, with the Ukrainian leader seeking support from European allies at a critical time for his country. Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre has confirmed that Kyiv requested the meeting, which aims to steer relations between Ukraine and the US towards a more constructive path.

A major point of contention has been the alleged withholding of intelligence by the US, with Ukrainian officials claiming it has resulted in lost lives. This accusation was rejected as "scandalous" and "outrageous by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who spoke out against it after military technical adviser Serhii Beskrestnov shared his concerns.

The lack of reliable warning from the US has had a significant impact on Ukrainian operations, with some officials receiving crucial information before attacks and others not being informed at all. This inconsistent flow of intelligence has reportedly led to lives being lost in Ukraine, fueling tensions between Kyiv and Washington.

The Oslo talks are seen as an opportunity for both sides to clear up misunderstandings and work towards a more collaborative approach to the conflict, with Støre stating that they want to ensure the war ends diplomatically with a lasting and just peace.

Zelensky has stated that his discussion with Rubio was productive and focused on the need for early warnings from the US, as well as the deployment of missile interceptors.

US senators had previously called for an investigation into disruptions to the Starlink internet network in Ukraine, which is provided by SpaceX. Unconfirmed reports also suggested that the transfer of Patriot interceptors to Ukraine has not yet been approved.

The US Secretary of State was in India last week and acknowledged to reporters that it may be true that Patriot interceptor missiles have not arrived in Ukraine, although this was not done intentionally.

Witkoff will be joined by several European representatives at the talks, including Finnish President Alexander Stubb and officials from the UK, Poland, France, Germany, the EU and Nato via video-link.

The recent deal between Trump and Putin has sparked concerns among European leaders about the US's stance on Russia. The agreement to supply diesel fuel to the US and other markets has brought an end to American sanctions on Russian diesel exports, a move that has been seen as a concession to Moscow.

This development comes at a time when US midterm elections are just around the corner, with Trump blaming Ukraine's attacks on Russian oil refineries for record-high fuel prices in the US. European leaders have taken issue with this narrative, arguing that it deflects attention from the real causes of rising fuel costs.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has spoken out about the mixed signals coming from Washington, describing them as mixed pictures and messages" on the war. He has emphasized the need for a joint effort to resolve the conflict, but notes that the US has not been contributing financially to Ukraine's defense since 2025.

As European leaders express their concerns, Ukraine prepares to engage with US envoys in Oslo, where key issues will be discussed.

The international community continues to weigh in on Ukraine's conflict with Russia, with European leaders expressing concerns about the financial strain of supporting Kyiv.

European countries are making significant efforts to maintain their budget commitments to Ukraine, despite the economic burden. In a recent interview, a German leader acknowledged the challenges of sustaining this support until the war ends.

Ukraine's relationship with its Western partners has been complex, with some officials describing it as a partnership rather than an alliance. A US vice-president recently stated that while Ukraine is not a formal ally, they do have divergent interests on certain issues.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ck9qzn193lrlo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

In a statement outside the White House on Monday, Trump expressed his frustration with Zelenskyy's handling of the conflict, suggesting that he should have resolved the issue long ago. Trump claimed that if Zelenskyy had listened to him, he would have made a better deal by now.

The US president has been criticizing Zelenskyy for several days, with his verbal jabs at the Ukrainian leader escalating into a full-blown public feud between the two leaders. The rift between them deepened further on Sunday when Trump made another scathing comment about Zelenskyy's leadership.

Trump's comments have sparked concern that the US may be losing its influence in Ukraine as the conflict with Russia continues to drag on. His defense of sanctions waivers for Russia has also raised eyebrows, with some analysts questioning whether this move is aimed at keeping Moscow engaged in talks or merely coddling a key ally.

The Trump administration's decision to waive sanctions on Russia has sparked outrage in Ukraine, with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warning that it will embolden Russian aggression and hinder efforts to end the conflict.

Zelenskyy's concerns were echoed by US officials who argue that the move rewards Moscow for its continued involvement in Ukraine. The decision comes as tensions between Washington and Kyiv have been rising, with some analysts suggesting that Trump is prioritizing his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin over Ukraine's interests.

The waiver has also sparked controversy due to separate plans announced by Trump to allow Russia to export large quantities of diesel fuel to the US and global markets. This move aims to tackle soaring fuel prices following the conflict in Iran, but it has been criticized for undermining efforts to pressure Moscow into ending its involvement in Ukraine.

Zelenskyy expressed frustration with the administration's handling of military aid during a meeting with US senators on Monday, where he highlighted delays in arms shipments and restricted intelligence sharing. He also noted that several European countries are prepared to transfer Patriot interceptor missiles but are awaiting US approval.

Tensions between Ukraine and the US have escalated as President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed frustration over a lack of advance warning on Russian attacks from its partners. In a video posted on Telegram, he revealed that Ukraine had not received timely warnings on three separate occasions in the past week.

The dispute has also centered around Starlink services in Ukraine, with Zelenskyy accusing the US of deliberately disrupting them last week. However, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio rejected this claim, sparking further tension between the two nations.

As diplomacy efforts continue, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff is set to travel to Norway for negotiations on ending the war in Ukraine. The Oslo talks are expected to bring together key players including Zelenskyy and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store, as well as representatives from the E4, European Union, and NATO.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/20/us-ukraine-relations-sour-as-trump-zelenskyy-clash-over-talks-arms?traffic_source=rss

The diesel deal has added to the tensions between Washington and Kyiv, which have been strained in recent weeks due to reports of disruptions to Starlink/Starshield services. The service was suspended for two days, from October 13-14, before being restored. However, unconfirmed reports suggest that the restrictions may have been imposed by the White House as a pressure tactic on Ukraine.

The disruption of Starlink/Starshield services has further strained relations between Ukraine and the US, which have already been strained due to Trump's previous tilts towards Moscow. On Friday, Zelenskyy accused Washington of continuing to throttle Starlink and making concessions to Russia.

Trump's decision to prioritize a diesel deal with Putin over Ukraine is not unprecedented, as he has done so before at his August 2025 summit in Alaska. However, despite this history, the arrangement under which Europe pays for US weapons delivered to Ukraine continues to work, and the US still shares intelligence with Kyiv.

Despite earlier proposals to reconsider certain aspects of its peace framework, the White House has softened its stance on several key issues. Specifically, it has dropped plans to officially recognize Crimea as part of Russia and to require Ukraine to withdraw from all of its Donbas region.

Ukraine and Europe have continued to cooperate with US diplomatic efforts aimed at Moscow, led by envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. This cooperation includes going along with the diesel deal, despite potential opposition from Congress.

However, this cooperation should not lull Ukraine or its European backers into a false sense of security. There are many reasons for them to be concerned, beyond just Trump's unpredictable nature.

One major concern is Putin's determination to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. Cities and critical infrastructure are being targeted daily by ballistic missiles and upgraded drones, putting a strain on Ukraine's air defences. The country is also bracing for another harsh winter.

Russia has been portraying itself as the victim of Ukrainian aggression, after Kyiv resumed its attacks, including an attack on a refinery in Ryazan that Trump described as "a disgrace".

Fighting has escalated along NATO's eastern border as Ukrainian grain shipments through the Black Sea have come under attack in Romanian waters. This move by Russia appears to be part of a broader strategy to disrupt Ukraine's supply chain and gain leverage over key European countries. The attacks on grain ships are likely aimed at crippling Ukraine's economy and eroding its ability to resist Russian aggression.

Russia is also waging a hybrid war against Europe, seeking to intimidate and influence public opinion in crucial member states like Germany. By spreading fear through targeted attacks, Moscow aims to sway the balance of power within the EU. This tactic has already shown some success, with some European leaders beginning to re-evaluate their stance on Russia.

In response to these developments, some EU countries are pushing for renewed engagement with Moscow. Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico recently announced that his country's intergovernmental economic commission with Russia would resume work. Meanwhile, Bulgarian President Rumen Radev has expressed support for Trump's efforts to negotiate a diesel fuel deal with Moscow.

The financial burden of supporting Ukraine is becoming increasingly unsustainable for European countries. The 90-billion-euro loan authorized by the EU in April may run out before the end of 2027, leaving Kyiv facing an estimated shortfall of up to 70 billion euros for defense and civilian purposes that year. This has sparked a heated debate within the EU about how to finance Ukraine's needs.

The question of whether aid for Ukraine should come from Russia's frozen financial assets in Europe is once again being raised as a possible solution. Trump has called for some of these funds to be released, while others are advocating for deep cuts in EU spending to address the budget shortfall.

The looming elections in several European countries have added to the pressure on leaders to address the budget shortfall and make tough decisions about aid to Ukraine.

In a rare display of unity, European Council President Antonio Costa and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy were joined by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels last week. Costa emphasized that support for Ukraine must continue despite the challenges facing Europe, while Zelenskyy reminded everyone of the consequences if aid is withdrawn.

The EU has taken steps to bolster its relationship with Ukraine ahead of the summit, including opening two clusters in accession talks and imposing new sanctions on Russia. This move follows a meeting between Zelenskyy and British leaders in London earlier this week.

As it stands, the EU and UK have become the primary supporters of Ukraine's survival as an independent state. They have filled the void left by the US, which has been unable to provide consistent support. For Ukraine, becoming a member of the EU or a closely integrated partner like Norway remains its long-term goal.

The path ahead will be fraught with difficulty, particularly in light of the upcoming elections and the need for European leaders to balance competing priorities and make tough decisions about aid to Ukraine.

Europe's military capabilities are currently insufficient to fill the void left by the United States in Ukraine. The ongoing conflict has made it clear that European forces lack the necessary firepower and resources to effectively counter Russian aggression on their own.

The absence of a viable alternative to Starlink is another significant concern for Europe. While European intelligence agencies can provide some data support, they are unable to replicate the satellite-based communication system's capabilities in the short term.

As a result, European nations are investing heavily in developing their own air-defence systems and interceptors. However, these efforts are expected to take at least a decade to bear fruit, leaving Europe reliant on US support for the foreseeable future.

In negotiations with Russia, Europe lacks the leverage needed to bring Vladimir Putin to the table. While sanctions relief and restored energy flows could serve as incentives, any Russian response is likely to require pressure of some kind, something that has thus far eluded the United States under Trump's leadership.

Both Ukraine's President Zelenskyy and European leaders will likely adopt a cautious approach to dealing with Trump, attempting to maintain good relations with him while navigating their own differences. They may be counting on the current White House overture to Russia to lose momentum after the upcoming midterm elections.

They will probably advise Trump that his legacy would be best served by standing firm against Moscow, an opinion shared by many of his fellow Republicans. This wait-and-see strategy relies on weathering through the winter and, ultimately, the end of Trump's presidency.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/10/17/ukraine-and-europe-have-little-choice-but-to-work-with-trump?traffic_source=rss

The incident comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced that his government would resume attacks on Russian energy infrastructure, which had been temporarily halted at the request of the US. This decision was reportedly made in response to continued strikes on Ukrainian energy targets by Russia.

Zelensky claimed that the US had withdrawn its intelligence-sharing on Russian strikes, allegedly as a pressure tactic to persuade Ukraine to abandon its military campaign altogether. He also accused Washington of restricting access to Starlink satellite services used by Ukraine's military, stating this was an intentional move.

The Russian defense ministry confirmed that several missiles and drones were intercepted over Ryazan, resulting in a fire at the oil refinery. The incident is being seen as a significant escalation of tensions between Russia and Ukraine following the announcement by Zelensky to resume attacks on energy infrastructure.

As part of his previous agreement with US President Donald Trump, Zelensky had agreed to restrict Ukrainian strikes if Moscow also adhered to an "energy ceasefire. However, he accused Russia of ignoring this proposal after its announcement.

The sudden withdrawal of key US support elements has left Ukrainian officials feeling betrayed by Washington.

According to reports, Ukrainian leaders had been informed by their US counterparts that if they did not stop certain strikes, intelligence sharing would be blocked.

This move is particularly significant given Ukraine's reliance on US-provided early-warning alerts for incoming Russian aerial attacks. These alerts enable the country to mount effective air defences and limit successful strikes.

The restriction has also affected the use of Starlink internet links throughout Ukraine's war effort, which are used to guide drones and protect its skies.

Ukraine's Ministry of Defence is still working to clarify the reasons behind the unexpected restrictions on the military-focused version of Starlink.

Sources within the ministry confirmed that operation while on the move had been restored, but officials remain unsure about what caused the initial disruption.

The incident has sparked concerns among Ukrainian soldiers, with one drone reconnaissance unit member describing deliberate restrictions on the network as a betrayal".

A soldier known as Neo expressed his concerns on BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has brought international leaders together for an emergency summit in Brussels, where they are expected to discuss the escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's visit to London earlier this week was also marked by a significant development, as Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced that the UK would speed up delivery of lightweight multirole missiles to Kyiv. This move is seen as a demonstration of international support for Ukraine in its fight against Russia.

The Ukrainian president has made it clear that his country's military strategy will remain unchanged, with strikes on Russian oil infrastructure continuing unless certain conditions are met. Zelensky emphasized the importance of cutting off revenue streams to Russia's war machine and stated that this goal can only be achieved if the US supplies more Patriot air defence missiles.

Ukraine has been facing a shortage of these critical defences since the outbreak of the conflict, with stockpiles consumed by the demands of the Iran war. The situation highlights the complex web of international relationships and alliances that are being tested by the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

As European leaders gather for their summit, they will be grappling with the implications of Zelensky's comments on US-Ukrainian relations. In an interview, he suggested that his American counterpart has a tendency to align himself with autocratic leaders like Russia's Vladimir Putin, leaving some wondering about the future of this crucial alliance.

The relationship between the leaders of Russia and the US has been strained in recent times. The friction became apparent during a heated Oval Office meeting last year when one leader implied that his counterpart was hindering efforts to broker a peace deal.

This tension is still palpable as Ukraine's President walks a delicate diplomatic tightrope, showing willingness to engage with US-brokered deals while emphasizing the need for fair terms in any potential agreement. His stance has been consistent: he will only accept a peace deal that is just.

However, he recently expressed strong reservations about an agreement between Russia and the US, under which 300,000 tonnes of diesel fuel would be released into the global market. The Ukrainian President saw this as a tacit endorsement of Russia's war efforts by the US.

The agreement was part of an effort to address rising fuel prices in the US, particularly diesel, which have become a pressing concern ahead of midterm elections. This issue has taken on added significance given the sharp increase in petrol costs following months of conflict with Iran.

Local officials in Kirovohrad confirmed that at least three people had lost their lives as a result of Russia's latest assault on the central region, which has suffered its largest attack since the full-scale invasion began in 2022.

The devastating impact of the Russian strikes was also felt in other parts of Ukraine, with reports emerging of casualties in Donetsk, Kherson and Volyn. The sheer scale of the attacks is a stark reminder of the ongoing conflict, with dozens of cities and communities targeted by more than 850 drones launched over the past day alone.

The rising death toll has sparked concern about Russia's intentions, particularly given its decision to escalate attacks despite the easing of sanctions and international pressure on Ukraine.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqwyrnwd9dw1o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

According to Trump, both sides have agreed to halt their attacks on each other's energy facilities, which he attributed to his own intervention. However, this claim contradicts the assessment of Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who reported that at least six Ukrainian energy installations had been struck by Russian forces since Sunday.

Trump's comments came in response to questions from reporters on Monday and were made despite the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. When pressed about the Russian strikes, Trump acknowledged that there may have been violations of the ceasefire agreement on both sides.

The conflict began in February 2022 with Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which has led to significant loss of life and damage to infrastructure.

The announcement by former US President Donald Trump of a purported energy ceasefire in Ukraine has been met with skepticism from Kyiv and its European allies.

Critics argue that Trump's decision to temporarily ease US sanctions on Russian diesel was a misguided move that undermines years of effort to isolate Russia's economy and embolden Vladimir Putin. The move drew widespread outrage in Europe and Ukraine, where it is seen as a betrayal of the West's commitment to supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression.

In Washington, lawmakers from both major parties have expressed their discontent with Trump's decision, with some Republicans objecting that it undercuts a law signed by Trump himself to tighten restrictions on Moscow. The move has also raised questions about the US government's consistency in enforcing its own laws and policies.

Despite Zelenskyy's assertion that Ukraine is prepared to sign guarantees for an energy ceasefire, it appears increasingly unlikely that Russia will comply with such an agreement. In fact, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reported a significant escalation of Russian attacks on energy facilities in Ukraine, including six such incidents today alone, resulting in 33 wounded people across the country.

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been criticized by some for not being more receptive to a ceasefire in Ukraine's conflict with Russia. However, others argue that he is simply being cautious and not willing to give in to Russian demands without tangible progress on the ground.

Meanwhile, former US President Donald Trump has taken a different approach to the situation, suggesting that Ukraine itself is the main obstacle to peace. He claims that Russian President Vladimir Putin is more eager for a deal than Zelenskyy, and has even called on Ukrainians to vote their president out of office.

This stance is unusual given the strained relationship between Trump and Zelenskyy since Trump returned to the White House in 2025. It also contradicts previous statements made by Trump announcing agreements between Russia and Ukraine that ultimately failed to materialize.

The timing of Trump's latest announcement appears to be driven by his desire to bring down diesel prices before the US midterm elections on November 3, which he believes is crucial for protecting industries such as farming and ranching in the US.

Most polls suggest that Republicans may lose control of Congress due to growing voter frustration over rising prices, particularly for gasoline.

A recent opinion survey by the Associated Press and the University of Chicago found that 65 percent of US adults blame the White House for high living costs, with many citing Trump's tariff policies and his conflict with Iran as contributing factors.

As the energy ceasefire comes under scrutiny, Ukraine's European allies have expressed skepticism about its effectiveness.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/10/13/trump-insists-energy-ceasefire-holds-as-ukraine-reports-new-russian-strikes?traffic_source=rss

The White House's stance is at odds with the situation on the ground in Ukraine. Despite Zelenskyy's five-year term expiring in 2024, a wartime extension has been granted by both Ukraine's constitution and martial law. This means that Zelenskyy will remain in office for the foreseeable future.

Ukrainians are divided over whether to hold new elections, with some calling for a change of leadership but others hesitant due to the ongoing four-and-a-half year war. A presidential vote is unlikely anytime soon, given the current circumstances.

In response to Trump's comments, Zelenskyy proposed holding an election if Russian President Vladimir Putin guaranteed a 60-day ceasefire. This would provide a temporary reprieve from hostilities and allow for a peaceful transfer of power.

Analysts believe that any elections held in the near future would likely pit Zelenskyy against one of his former military commanders, with some speculating that he could be a strong contender. Other potential candidates include old political heavyweights such as Viktor Poroshenko and Yulia Tymoshenko, but they may not stand a chance due to their past performances in elections.

Ukraine's former top general and current ambassador to the United Kingdom has gained significant popularity among Ukrainians since his resignation in 2024.

A recent poll conducted by the Rating Group found that nearly two-thirds of Ukrainians trust Valerii Zaluzhnyi, while only a quarter distrust him. This high level of trust is attributed to his military successes during Russia's invasion in 2022.

Zaluzhnyi played a crucial role in defending Kyiv and leading counteroffensives that reclaimed significant territory from Russian control. He was instrumental in returning approximately 40 percent of occupied land back to Ukraine.

Despite being fired in 2023, Zaluzhnyi remains an enigmatic figure when it comes to postwar matters such as economic restoration, demographic crisis, and Ukraine's bid to join the European Union.

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy remains a polarizing figure in his country despite facing corruption scandals within his inner circle.

A recent poll by Rating Group found that over half of Ukrainians, 53 percent, still trust him, although an equal number do not, indicating a deeply divided public opinion on the president's leadership.

Zelenskyy's ability to maintain popularity stems from his strong performance in previous elections. He won the presidency in 2019 with a landslide victory of 73 percent of the vote, setting a record for Ukraine's post-Soviet history.

However, Zelenskyy has also made some questionable appointments during his tenure, which may have damaged his reputation among Ukrainians.

The Ukrainian military's efforts against Russia have received a significant boost under the leadership of Defense Minister Fedorov. The ministry he leads has implemented various measures to increase transparency in procurement processes for essential supplies such as weaponry, food, and medical equipment.

This move has led to a crackdown on corruption schemes, making it more difficult for individuals to embezzle funds allocated for these purposes. As a result, the military's supply routes have been severely disrupted by drone attacks, with Russia's Black Sea Fleet forced to retreat from annexed Crimea to the Russian port of Novorossiysk.

Fedorov has also overseen an increase in the number of drones deployed against Russian targets, resulting in significant damage to arms and fuel depots, oil refineries, and air defense systems. Additionally, the number of ground robots used for supplying food and ammunition as well as rescuing wounded soldiers has been significantly boosted.

The reforms implemented by Fedorov have not been without controversy, however, with some officials reportedly pushing for his dismissal in July. Despite this, he remains a popular figure among Ukrainians, with his approval ratings soaring from 35 percent in June to 65 percent in July, according to recent polls.

Fedorov's success in simplifying bureaucratic procedures through the Diia smartphone app has also contributed to his growing popularity, as it allows users to access over 100 government services online. This initiative has been well-received by the public and has helped to increase transparency within the government.

Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been under scrutiny from US President Donald Trump, who has suggested that Ukraine needs a new leader.

A recent survey revealed that Zelenskyy's approval rating stands at 38 percent, with many Ukrainians expressing dissatisfaction with his performance. In August, he made headlines by advocating for a presidential vote in Ukraine, which was met with criticism from the public.

The list of potential candidates to replace Zelenskyy includes several notable figures, including Yevhenii Khmara, a general who serves as defence minister and is trusted by 29 percent of Ukrainians.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/12/trump-thinks-ukraine-needs-a-new-president-who-could-replace-zelenskyy?traffic_source=rss

Trump announced the deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin, stating that Russia would release 300,000 tonnes of diesel immediately to the American and global marketplace, followed by several more shipments in the coming months. This includes an additional 500,000 tonnes in November and one million tonnes after that, with a further three million tonnes expected to be delivered once its refineries are operational again.

Critics argue that this deal undermines US laws, which aim to restrict imports of Russian oil and gas due to ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine. The plan has been met with disapproval from some Republican and Democratic lawmakers who believe it puts American interests at risk. They claim the move is contradictory to recent legislation signed by Trump.

Russia's Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak confirmed the details of the deal, stating that the country aims to export a large volume of diesel in the coming months. He mentioned that the export could reach three million tonnes per month in future, with Russia seeking to capitalise on high demand for diesel globally. This move is likely to fuel further debate over US-Russia relations and energy policies.

Trump has stated his priority as lowering prices for Americans, particularly farmers, ranchers, and truckers who rely heavily on diesel fuel. He made this clear in a recent post on Truth Social, highlighting the importance of affordable fuel for these key sectors of the economy. However, critics remain unconvinced by the deal's merits, with concerns over its implications for US energy policy and security.

The opposition to President Trump's plan to import diesel from Russia is growing, with several lawmakers speaking out against the deal. A group of seven senators, comprising four Republicans and three Democrats, have called on Trump to reverse his decision, citing concerns that it violates US laws.

According to these lawmakers, Congress explicitly banned Russian energy imports in 2022 as a way to prevent American dollars from financing Russia's war against Ukraine. They argue that providing Putin with a financial lifeline would only serve to prolong the conflict and further destabilize the region.

The senators also pointed out that the US Treasury is suspending sanctions on Russian diesel exports until April 7, allowing for the importation of these products despite other assets remaining frozen. This selective lifting of sanctions has been criticized as a favoritism towards Russia's energy sector.

Critics argue that this deal undermines US energy policy and national security interests, particularly in light of ongoing tensions with Russia. The lawmakers who spoke out against the plan are urging Trump to reconsider his decision and prioritize American interests over short-term economic gains.

The opposition from these senators is just one example of the growing backlash against President Trump's plan to import diesel from Russia, which has sparked concerns about its implications for US energy policy and security.

The rising global fuel prices have had a significant impact on the US economy, particularly in the agricultural sector. The cost of diesel has become a major concern for farmers who rely heavily on it to operate machinery and transport their products to market.

The average price of diesel in the US is currently $6.28 per gallon, according to the American Automobile Association (AAA). This is down from the record high of $6.53 recorded at the end of September, but still a significant burden for farmers and consumers alike.

Analysts have raised questions about Russia's ability to meet the demand for diesel, should the US import it from there. They are also skeptical about whether this move will actually ease prices for American consumers in the long run.

The impact of the war with Iran on global fuel supplies has been severe, disrupting the flow of crude oil and driving up prices. This has become a major issue ahead of next month's midterms elections, which could determine the fate of President Trump's Republican Party in Congress.

Polls show that a majority of Americans disapprove of President Trump's handling of the economy and the war with Iran, which is likely to be a key factor in the upcoming elections.

The US relies heavily on diesel fuel, consuming approximately 3.6 million barrels every day. If Russia delivers its promised 300,000 tons this month, which is roughly half of the daily consumption, it would still leave a significant gap in meeting the country's needs.

International leaders are also voicing their disapproval of Trump's deal with Russia to import diesel fuel. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and UK Defence Secretary Wes Streeting have criticized the move, urging the US and its allies to step up pressure on Russia to end the war in Ukraine instead of pursuing energy cooperation with Moscow.

The development comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky welcomed a reported "energy ceasefire" between Russia and Ukraine announced by Trump over the weekend. However, there has been no response from Moscow yet, leaving the situation uncertain.

BBC News Business: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjn5v21py07vo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The announcement has been met with caution from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who initially expressed surprise before stating that Kyiv would support the agreement if Moscow does. However, he also accused Russia of targeting Ukrainian energy facilities after Trump's statement.

Trump has been pushing Ukraine to halt strikes on Russian oil infrastructure, which Kyiv says are crucial in reducing revenue for Moscow's war efforts. This move is linked to a recent deal between Russia and the US, where Moscow agreed to release diesel fuel to the global market in exchange for lifting sanctions on imports.

The diesel deal has sparked growing criticism from European officials and some US politicians, including those from Trump's own Republican party, who do not support it. Ukrainian President Zelensky went so far as to call the agreement a gift to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

This is part of Trump's efforts to lower domestic fuel prices ahead of the midterm elections, which have been affected by rising global fuel costs, particularly for diesel, due in part to the ongoing conflict with Iran.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed surprise at learning about a supposed energy truce between Ukraine and Russia, stating that it was news to him when asked by Axios.

In response to Trump's call for an energy ceasefire, Zelensky said his officials were eager to receive clear details on America's dialogue with Russia regarding the proposed truce. He emphasized that Ukraine is prepared not to strike at Russian energy facilities in exchange for similar readiness from Moscow and agreement from the US President.

Support for Trump's initiative has been voiced by several countries, including the UK, France, Canada, and the European Union. UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham echoed Trump's call, stating that Britain strongly supports a sustained energy ceasefire starting immediately.

However, Zelensky later revealed that Russia had continued to target Ukrainian energy infrastructure despite the supposed truce. A drone attack on a power plant in Kyiv resulted in power cuts, followed by strikes on facilities in the north-eastern Kharkiv region.

The exchange of attacks on energy installations has been ongoing between Ukraine and Russia for months. While Moscow claims it targets legitimate sites that support Ukrainian military operations, Zelensky views these actions as part of a broader effort to reduce Russia's ability to finance the war by disrupting its energy supply chains.

The attacks on Russian energy infrastructure have had a ripple effect, disrupting energy supplies on both sides of the conflict. The impact is being felt as Ukraine struggles to maintain its power grid and Russia faces challenges in meeting its own domestic energy needs.

Criticism of Trump's deal has been coming from all corners, including politicians in the UK and Europe. On Sunday, UK Defence Secretary Wes Streeting spoke out against it, echoing the sentiments expressed by EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas on Saturday. Both officials have questioned the wisdom of providing relief to Russia's energy sector.

The US Congress is also weighing in on the issue, with a group of seven senators publishing a statement that criticizes Trump's deal. They argue that it runs counter to existing legislation that bans Russian energy imports until Ukraine ends its aggression and ceases threats against NATO allies. The senators are urging the administration to reverse course.

Republican Senator Thom Tillis has gone further, warning that the deal will put American lives at risk. His comments come as Trump continues to trade barbs with Ukrainian President Zelensky over the diesel deal.

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has led to renewed tensions between the country's president and US leaders.

Regional officials have confirmed that six people were killed in separate attacks on two Ukrainian cities over the weekend, highlighting the ongoing violence. In addition, one person was reportedly killed in Russia's Belgorod region, which shares a border with Ukraine, while another fatality occurred in the Russian-occupied Donetsk region following a drone strike.

The escalating violence comes as US President Trump continues to exchange barbs with Ukrainian President Zelensky over a contentious diesel deal. Despite this, Zelensky's office has welcomed Trump's earlier claim of an energy ceasefire", suggesting that some level of cooperation may be possible between the two leaders.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6pvg4jyz1m0o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The assault targeted residential buildings in the south-eastern city, with eyewitness accounts suggesting widespread destruction. Among those confirmed dead are three children, while at least 16 others were hurt in the attack, which occurred on Saturday morning.

As rescue efforts continue, officials warn that several people remain trapped under debris and are still missing. Acting Mayor Regina Kharchenko described the scene as "catastrophic, with entire floors of an apartment block collapsing after being hit by a glide bomb.

Rescue teams from Ukraine's emergency services are working tirelessly to locate any survivors, with more than 80 workers involved in search operations that are expected to continue throughout the day.

The strike on Zaporizhzhia has sparked outrage and grief among Ukrainians, who are struggling to come to terms with the latest loss of life in the ongoing conflict.

President Volodymyr Zelensky has condemned Russia's actions, accusing them of targeting ordinary life" by attacking Ukraine's data centres. This move is seen as a deliberate attempt to disrupt the country's infrastructure and way of life, rather than focusing on military targets.

Zelensky has also criticized recent developments in the international arena, specifically US President Donald Trump's announcement of a diesel deal with Russia. He views this agreement as a gift to Russian President Vladimir Putin, which will only serve to prolong the war in Ukraine. According to Zelensky, Russia interprets any easing of pressure as a signal that it can continue its military campaign.

Both sides have intensified their attacks on each other's infrastructure in recent months, with Zaporizhzhia being a frequent target due to its strategic location and sizeable population. With over 700,000 residents, the city is a major regional centre located just a short distance from the front line, making it vulnerable to Russian drone and missile strikes.

The recent surge in Russian attacks on Ukrainian cities has resulted in a significant increase in civilian casualties.

On Thursday, a devastating glide bomb attack on two buses in Kramatorsk left at least 33 people dead, adding to the mounting toll of lives lost in the conflict. The city, with its population of over 700,000 residents, is particularly vulnerable due to its proximity to the front line, making it susceptible to Russian drone and missile strikes.

The escalating attacks have disrupted daily life for Ukraine's citizens, causing fear and uncertainty among the population.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwvgdpv642g5o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss