For Adrianne, who works in digital marketing in London, the condition has been a constant companion for nearly five years. It took her two years to get a diagnosis, during which time she was misdiagnosed with colon cancer, Crohn's disease, and even given false accusations about her partner's infidelity.

Adrianne's experience is not unique, as many women have shared their struggles with chronic UTIs on social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram. They describe the condition as a debilitating cycle that has stripped them of their ability to work properly, maintain relationships, and enjoy normal social lives.

Experts estimate that up to 1.7 million women in the UK could be affected by chronic UTIs, but this number may be an underestimate due to the stigma surrounding the condition. Men and children are also affected, although the prevalence among women is significantly higher.

Adrianne's decision to share her story on social media has been a way for her to cope with the condition and raise awareness about its impact. By doing so, she hopes to help others who may be struggling in silence due to the shame and stigma associated with living with a chronic UTI.

Adrianne's decision to share her struggles with chronic urinary tract infections (UTIs) on social media has sparked a positive response from others who are experiencing similar symptoms.

The condition is characterized by persistent infection and pain despite standard treatment with antibiotics, leaving some women feeling trapped in their own bodies.

Those affected often experience debilitating abdominal pain that can be unpredictable and vary in intensity, ranging from mild discomfort to excruciating spasms.

Women living with chronic UTIs may also struggle with frequent urination, which can become a source of distress as they navigate daily life, always worried about having a flare-up.

As experts note, diagnosing chronic UTIs can be challenging due to the possibility of false negatives when relying on urine samples, and the condition often overlaps with other conditions such as endometriosis.

Adrianne's experience of being dismissed by doctors while seeking a diagnosis for her recurring urinary tract infections (UTIs) is not an isolated one. Many women face similar frustrations when trying to get their symptoms taken seriously.

Health professionals are now emphasizing the importance of listening to patients' stories in order to accurately diagnose chronic conditions such as recurrent or persistent UTIs. By doing so, they can avoid giving general advice on hygiene and hydration that fails to address the underlying issue.

The online community has become a crucial source of support for women like Adrianne who feel stigmatized by their condition. Social media platforms are filled with stories from young women who worry about being "dirty" or "not taking care of themselves," highlighting the need for education on UTIs and their causes.

Laura Von Müllen, another woman living with a chronic UTI, has taken to TikTok to share her experiences. She notes that her symptoms not only affected her university studies but also became increasingly difficult to manage when she started working remotely from Kent.

The stigma surrounding urinary tract infections (UTIs) is slowly being dismantled as women share their personal experiences on social media, but misconceptions still persist.

Some people mistakenly believe that UTIs are a result of promiscuity, with others asking who the individual has been in relationships with. However, this assumption is not only unfounded but also stigmatizing.

Experts agree that discussing conditions like UTIs openly can help reduce the number of women suffering from undiagnosed or mismanaged infections.

When seeking information online, individuals must be cautious as they may come across misinformation and unproven "hacks" that could exacerbate their condition.

BBC News Health: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwly3g0g371go?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The online food delivery company had been testing AI-generated pictures as a way to showcase dishes that lacked images, but the results were far from accurate. In some cases, the AI created bizarre and humorous depictions of food, such as bacon and eggs floating in a glass of cola due to a misinterpretation of "soda" and "soda bread.

The mistakes have sparked amusement online, with many users sharing screenshots of the incorrect images on social media platforms. Just Eat's use of AI was intended to streamline its operations and improve customer experience, but it appears that more work is needed to refine the technology.

A spokesperson for Just Eat has confirmed that the company is removing the incorrect images from its platform and putting a hold on generating further AI-enhanced pictures until the system can be improved.

The online community has had a field day poking fun at the AI-generated images of food items on Just Eat's platform. The UK subreddit for the delivery app has seen a surge in posts showcasing the more... creative interpretations of popular dishes.

Some examples include a bacon and egg soda bread dish being depicted as a glass of fizzy drink with a cooked egg and bacon floating in it, courtesy of a Belfast cafe. Meanwhile, spelling mistakes on menu items have added an extra layer of confusion to the mix. For instance, garlic bread was mistakenly labeled as plain bread, leading to a rather unusual image.

The AI-generated images are clearly marked as such when viewed on the Just Eat platform, but that hasn't stopped users from sharing their favorites online. A collection of these humorous mishaps has been compiled by an Instagram account dedicated to highlighting unusual food items.

The misadventures of Just Eat's AI-powered menu images have provided a much-needed respite from the usual news cycle, with social media users reveling in the absurdity of it all.

The mishaps of Just Eat's AI-powered menu images have not gone unnoticed on social media platforms. A recent post on Instagram showcased a cheese roll" that was actually just bread and cheese wrapped into a sushi-like shape, rather than the anticipated rolled format.

Some users found the inaccuracies amusing, while others were less enthusiastic about the idea of relying on AI-generated images to decide what to order from a restaurant. One person questioned the purpose of displaying such images, suggesting they could lead to disappointment if they don't match the actual dish.

A customer pointed out that seeing real images of dishes is essential for making informed decisions, as it helps them choose which restaurants or meals to select.

BBC News Technology: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crz981p0klvgo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

A study led by researchers at Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences revealed that during poxvirus infections, excess RNA produced can impair mitochondria's ability to produce energy. Mitochondria are tiny structures essential for cells to survive as they generate most of the energy needed.

The study's findings were published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and have significant implications beyond viral infections. They may also contribute to a better understanding of aging-related diseases and improve RNA-based medical treatments, including mRNA vaccines.

Dr. Zhilong Yang, a professor at Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences' Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, explained that scientists already know the importance of RNA degradation in controlling protein production and eliminating defective RNA. However, his team's research reveals another crucial role: maintaining cellular energy supply.

Cells constantly produce and break down RNA as part of their normal activities. This process helps regulate protein production, eliminate faulty RNA, control immune responses, and now appears to protect the cell's energy supply according to the study's findings.

Cells rely heavily on RNA to perform various functions. Messenger RNA (mRNA) is responsible for carrying genetic instructions that dictate which proteins are produced within a cell.

These proteins are essential for maintaining cellular structure and facilitating crucial chemical reactions. However, another type of RNA, known as double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), often appears during viral infections.

When dsRNA is detected, it serves as an alert to the immune system, warning of potential viral entry into the cell. Viruses typically produce large amounts of RNA as they replicate within infected cells, which would normally be cleared by cellular cleanup systems.

However, when RNA production surpasses the cell's ability to break it down, excessive material can interfere with mitochondria and impede energy production. This phenomenon is not unique to dsRNA, but also affects ordinary mRNA.

The study has uncovered an unexpected mechanism by which excessive RNA affects cells, and it appears to be linked to viral replication strategies. Poxviruses, responsible for diseases such as smallpox and mpox, seem to have evolved ways to manage this issue through the use of RNA cleanup mechanisms.

These mechanisms help infected cells remain functional long enough for viral replication to continue, suggesting that maintaining a balance within the cell is crucial for the virus's survival. As Yang notes, if the cell is not healthy, the virus would struggle to replicate effectively.

The study has also shed light on how excess RNA affects cellular powerhouses called mitochondria. Initially, researchers suspected that the damage was indirect and caused by the immune system responding to certain types of RNA.

However, experiments revealed a more direct relationship between excess RNA and mitochondrial damage. When isolated mitochondria were exposed to RNA in laboratory settings, damage occurred regardless of an immune response.

The findings indicate that excessive RNA can disrupt mitochondrial function directly, rather than through the body's typical response to infection. This discovery challenges previous understanding of how cells respond to viral infections and highlights a previously unknown cellular mechanism.

The accumulation of large amounts of RNA near mitochondria may disrupt their ability to produce energy for cells, scientists have discovered. Mitochondria are responsible for generating ATP, the molecule that serves as the primary source of energy for cells.

This process relies on maintaining an electrical and chemical difference across the inner membranes of mitochondria, which helps drive the production of ATP. The researchers suspect that large amounts of RNA with a negative electrical charge may accumulate near mitochondria, disturbing this delicate balance.

The negatively charged RNA may disrupt the electrical conditions required for efficient energy production in mitochondria. This concept is still being explored by the research team, who acknowledge that they do not yet fully understand how this process occurs.

Abnormal RNA accumulation has been observed in various health conditions, including certain cancers and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. Mitochondrial dysfunction could potentially contribute to cellular damage in these conditions.

The researchers propose that excess RNA may represent a previously unrecognized source of mitochondrial stress. Further studies are needed to determine the extent to which this mechanism contributes to various health problems, including aging-related disorders.

The discovery of how excessive RNA can harm cells has significant implications for various areas of research.

This includes the development of RNA-based therapies, such as mRNA vaccines, which rely on introducing RNA instructions into cells to produce specific proteins. Understanding how cells respond to and process RNA is crucial for designing these treatments effectively. The study's findings may help researchers optimize future RNA-based therapeutics and vaccines by providing a better understanding of cellular responses to large amounts of RNA.

The discovery also has implications for the design and optimization of future RNA-based therapies and vaccines, as it highlights the importance of controlling RNA levels in maintaining cellular health. By understanding how cells respond to excessive RNA, researchers can develop more effective treatments that minimize potential side effects. This knowledge could lead to improved healthcare outcomes and better disease management.

The study suggests that controlling RNA levels is essential for maintaining accurate protein production, managing immune activity, and ensuring mitochondria function properly. Mitochondrial damage can have significant consequences for cellular health, including reduced energy production and potentially even cell death. The research underscores the importance of a delicate balance in cellular processes to maintain overall health.

The scientists involved in the study noted that their findings were surprising, as they revealed that excessive mRNA can also cause mitochondrial damage and interfere with energy production. This was unexpected given that cells rely on mRNA for protein synthesis every day. The discovery highlights the complex relationship between RNA levels and cellular function, emphasizing the need for further research into this area.

The research's implications extend beyond basic scientific understanding, as it has potential applications in various fields, including medicine and healthcare. Further studies are necessary to explore the full extent of how excessive RNA affects cellular health and its role in various diseases.

Researchers have made a groundbreaking discovery that excessive RNA can starve cells of energy, leading to potential health issues.

This finding has significant implications for our understanding of cellular health and its connection to various diseases, including Alzheimer's, which may be detectable as early as 45 years old. A simple blood test could also reveal depression in individuals. Meanwhile, a recent discovery in superconductor science has turned conventional wisdom on its head, shedding new light on this complex field.

ScienceDaily Health: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/10/261020085023.htm

A video posted by Zelensky on social media shows him being greeted with a hug by Steve Witkoff, an envoy for the US president, ahead of their talks in Oslo. However, this warm welcome may not have alleviated Zelensky's concerns about the direction of US policy towards Ukraine.

Despite his efforts to project a positive image, Zelensky's message accompanying the video suggests that he still values the support of his international partners. His statement reads: "Ukraine is working for peace. I thank our partners for their support!"

The past ten days have seen a significant deterioration in relations between Trump and Zelensky, with both sides engaging in public criticism of each other.

Trump's comments about Zelensky have been particularly scathing, with the US president reportedly describing him as "not a good guy to deal with.

The relationship between Trump and Zelensky appears increasingly strained despite the optimism surrounding their meeting in Oslo. Experts are warning that the US president's recent comments about Ukraine may be a sign of deeper issues.

Zelensky has been careful not to directly criticize his American counterpart, but he has expressed frustration with the lack of progress on key issues. In a recent address to a congressional delegation, he acknowledged decisions on the American side that are difficult to understand and hinted at concerns about slowing down support for Ukraine.

The tension between Trump and Zelensky is not new, dating back to their infamous Oval Office confrontation in February 2025. Following this incident, the US suspended military aid and restricted intelligence sharing with Ukraine. However, a mechanism was later established for European countries to fund American equipment for Ukraine, alleviating some of the pressure.

The crisis has had significant consequences for Ukraine's ability to defend itself against Russian aggression. The country is currently facing a severe shortage of US-made Patriot air defence missiles, which are crucial in shooting down Russian ballistic missiles. With supplies dwindling, Kyiv is struggling to protect its citizens from the ongoing threat of missile attacks.

The Ukrainian government is facing a critical shortage of Patriot interceptors, which are crucial in defending against Russian missile attacks. According to an unnamed official, the country's stockpile has dwindled to just a couple of interceptors.

This alarming development comes as Ukraine struggles to protect its citizens from ongoing threats. The lack of effective defense systems has left Kyiv vulnerable to repeated missile strikes, causing significant concern among government officials and residents alike.

The Trump administration has been accused of slowing down the process for US allies to transfer their Patriot stocks to Ukraine. This move is seen as a hindrance in bolstering the country's defenses against Russian aggression.

The situation on the ground remains increasingly dire, with Kyiv struggling to cope with the consequences of Russia's military actions. The city is under constant threat from missile attacks, and the lack of adequate defense systems has left residents living in fear.

The US administration's actions have been met with criticism from former diplomats and officials who claim that Washington is prioritizing its relations with Moscow over Kyiv. This assessment comes as the Trump administration has been accused of providing concessions to Russia while imposing restrictions on Ukraine.

Russian officials have welcomed the recent diplomatic efforts, hailing them as a return to the spirit of Alaska, a phrase coined after the 2025 summit between Trump and Putin in Anchorage. The move is seen as a significant shift in tone from Washington's previous stance towards Moscow.

The US has been accused of restricting the flow of intelligence and interfering with Ukraine's access to Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service, although these claims have not been confirmed by Washington. This development has sparked concerns that the Trump administration is turning its back on Ukraine at a critical juncture in the conflict.

As Russia escalates its drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities, Kyiv has complained about the lack of advance warning provided by US satellite intelligence. The city's residents have expressed frustration over the delayed air raid alerts and mobile warnings, which were reportedly triggered after Russian missiles had already hit their targets.

The recent surge in attacks by advanced, jet-powered drones has put a significant strain on Ukraine's defenses since the summer months.

It remains unclear where the decision to limit Ukraine's use of Starlink or its military-grade equivalent, Starshield, originated from within the US administration.

According to Reuters, reports indicate that this directive came from the White House, sparking widespread speculation about the motivations behind such a move.

The lack of transparency surrounding this issue has led many to question the intentions of those in power, fueling ongoing tensions between the US and Ukraine.

The trust deficit between the two nations is a long-standing concern, with much of it stemming from Donald Trump's perceived distrust of Ukraine as a whole.

The diplomatic efforts in Oslo have yielded some positive developments, but it remains to be seen whether they will translate into concrete results on the ground.

Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre expressed optimism about the talks, stating that they had helped to straighten out a few things" and pave the way for further progress. However, the underlying issues between Ukraine and the US appear to run deep, with both sides still far apart on key issues.

The Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has indicated that some of the outstanding issues have been resolved, including the matter of early warning systems and the provision of Patriot missiles and Starlink technology. Despite this, his tone remains cautious, and it is clear that significant work remains to be done to rebuild trust between the two nations.

The situation is now set to unfold in St Petersburg, where Ukrainian officials will present updated proposals to Russian leaders. The success or failure of these talks will likely have far-reaching implications for the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, and the relationship between Ukraine and the US.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckrey51jrgnro?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The 34-year-old singer made the candid admission on Instagram over the weekend, stating that she had vaped nicotine extensively before realizing its effects on her vocal cords. She expressed regret for not quitting sooner, highlighting the challenges of nicotine addiction and urging others to avoid vaping altogether. Gomez is known for her powerful voice, which has been a defining feature of her music career.

Gomez's struggles with vaping are particularly noteworthy given her history with lupus, an autoimmune disease that can cause inflammation in various parts of the body, including the larynx or voice box. This condition often leads to raspy and strained voices during flare-ups, similar to those experienced during a common cold. In December last year, Gomez opened up about her struggles with lupus in an Instagram Q&A session, where she mentioned experiencing throat swelling and vocal cord issues.

Gomez's decision to speak out about the impact of vaping on her voice serves as a warning to others who may be considering nicotine use. Nicotine is notoriously difficult to quit due to its highly addictive properties, which can lead to long-term health consequences beyond just changes in one's voice.

As Selena Gomez continues to navigate her life in the public eye, a noticeable change in her voice has caught the attention of some fans. The shift is not entirely unexpected, as many people experience changes in their vocal tone as they age. However, some have taken it upon themselves to create compilation videos showcasing the evolution of her speaking style on platforms like YouTube.

In an Instagram video, Gomez shared that she had recently overcome a challenge by quitting nicotine. Her enthusiasm for this accomplishment is palpable, and she expresses hope that she will be able to maintain her progress. Recognizing the difficulties involved in overcoming addiction, she offers words of encouragement to those who may be facing similar struggles.

Evidence is slowly emerging regarding the potential side effects of vaping, although much remains unknown about its long-term consequences. A recent report from medical professionals has highlighted a range of health issues linked to vaping, including breathing problems, wheezing and coughing, dental concerns, sleep disturbances, mental health problems, and eye symptoms.

The addictive nature of nicotine in vapes is well-documented, which is why health organizations like the NHS strongly advise against non-smokers and children using e-cigarettes. Interestingly, research has shown that vaping can be an effective tool for helping smokers quit traditional cigarettes, despite its own set of risks.

Lupus is a chronic autoimmune disease that can cause a wide range of symptoms, including muscle and joint pain, fever, rashes, chest pain, hair loss, kidney problems, and fatigue. Gomez's experience with lupus has been well-documented over the years, and she has openly spoken about her struggles with the condition.

In 2017, Gomez underwent a kidney transplant from her friend Francia Raisa, which helped move her lupus into remission for a period of time. However, in her 2022 documentary Selena Gomez: My Mind And Me, she revealed that she had experienced a flare-up in 2020.

The potential negative effects of vaping on the kidneys are a concern for people with pre-existing kidney conditions like lupus. Given Gomez's history with kidney problems and her recent revelation about her vaping habit, some people have questioned whether nicotine use could be exacerbating her condition.

Gomez has been open about her struggles with health issues in the past, including a 2015 interview where she revealed her lupus diagnosis and discussed her experiences with chemotherapy.

The public has been vocal about Selena Gomez's decision to speak out about her struggles with nicotine addiction.

Many fans took to social media to express their thoughts on the matter, with some users expressing shock that someone who had received a kidney transplant from a generous donor would still engage in smoking and vaping. One user noted that it was "absolutely wild" for someone to continue their nicotine addiction despite receiving such a life-changing gift.

However, many fans praised Selena Gomez for her honesty and willingness to speak openly about her struggles with addiction, with one fan writing that it's a reminder that some habits can be difficult to break. This sentiment is echoed by another fan who expressed pride in the star for owning up to her struggles and striving to do better.

BBC News Entertainment: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cxly435ym787o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Hotels and beauty spots that were once happy to accommodate photographers for promotional purposes are now introducing rules to limit photoshoots. The five-star Hotel du Cap-Eden-Roc in Antibes has gone so far as to ban all photoshoots without prior permission.

This decision is reportedly a response to guests who have been booking reservations at the hotel, only to use their time there for commercial photography shoots. According to reports, these individuals would often bring large quantities of clothing and jewelry with them, using the hotel's amenities to create content for social media platforms.

The issue extends beyond high-end hotels, however, as less glamorous locations are also taking action against excessive commercial photography. The Hollies farm shop in Cheshire, which gained popularity after being featured on Love Island star Molly-Mae Hague's Instagram feed, has restricted photography and filming between 10am and 4pm daily.

The trend of influencers and content creators disrupting normal business operations is also evident in the hospitality industry, with one prominent restaurateur speaking out against the issue.

In an effort to maintain exclusivity and discretion, some high-end hotels are starting to restrict photography on their premises.

One such example is Hotel du Cap-Eden-Roc in France, where manager Sophie Volant has expressed concerns about the impact of influencer photoshoots on guest privacy.

The hotel's management wants to strike a balance between accommodating guests who appreciate being photographed and those who value discretion, particularly as they pay premium prices for their stays.

As part of this effort, some hotels are opting not to work with influencers altogether, instead focusing on creating unique experiences that cannot be replicated in a studio setting.

Anna Fedou, chief marketing officer at the Beaumier hotel group, acknowledges that her company sometimes collaborates with influencers, but emphasizes its primary goal is to provide exceptional hospitality.

Hotels and restaurants are increasingly restricting photography on their premises, a trend that reflects a broader shift away from capturing moments for others and towards immersing oneself in experiences.

This phenomenon is not dissimilar to clubs asking visitors to cover their phone cameras with stickers, says Alex Goat, founder of the youth culture agency Livity. By doing so, these establishments signal that they value genuine enjoyment over documenting an experience for social media.

A common misconception about influencers is that they are handsomely paid for creating content featuring luxury brands and locations. However, many influencers actually produce posts in exchange for free accommodations or services, hoping to attract the attention of brands who might be willing to collaborate with them.

Nicole Ocran, a prominent influencer who has set up the Creator Union to advocate on behalf of industry professionals, notes that most content creators operate without payment from brands. Instead, they rely on generating buzz and attracting potential partners through their work.

The controversy surrounding influencers' behavior is not new, as seen in past incidents like the 2021 backlash against Love Island stars who traveled to Dubai during lockdown. The luxury hotel industry's anti-photoshoot policies have also sparked accusations of sexism, with some critics arguing that influencer culture, which is heavily feminized and tied to promotional culture, has long been stigmatized in popular media.

The luxury hotel industry's anti-photoshoot policies have sparked controversy, particularly among social media influencers and their followers.

Some hotels are implementing strict rules against photoshoots, citing concerns about guest experience and noise disturbance. However, critics argue that these policies unfairly target a specific group of people - those who create content for a living. Influencer culture has become increasingly tied to promotional culture, leading some to accuse the industry of sexism.

The hotel industry's move to restrict photoshoots is happening at a time when social media use continues to rise rapidly. With over 5.4 billion people using social media every day, it's clear that online content creation is becoming an integral part of modern life.

By restricting photography in public spaces, hotels are sending a message about the value of private experiences and the importance of balancing personal and professional lives. This shift could have broader implications for how we approach social media consumption and the role of influencers in shaping our cultural landscape.

The Guardian Life and Style: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/oct/19/no-influencers-hotels-restaurants-beauty-spots-restricting-photoshoots

The move comes at a critical juncture for the film, which is currently expanding to over 470 screens across North America. The suspension raises fears about Big Tech's efforts to suppress content that challenges its interests. This irony is particularly striking given the film's purpose: to expose the very practices of suppression that TikTok has now employed against it.

Bleecker Street, the distributor behind Musk, received notification from TikTok on Friday afternoon that the account would be permanently suspended. The entire page was subsequently removed from the platform, putting an end to any plans the film company had made to promote certain posts through paid advertising.

The timing of the suspension is particularly galling for Bleecker Street, which had been planning to use ad money to boost visibility for specific content. Despite this setback, the company remains hopeful that a reversal could still be possible, although even if successful it may come too late to make a significant impact on the film's box office prospects.

The suspension of the 'Musk' film account on TikTok has sparked concerns about censorship and suppression of free speech. The account had been active for some time, garnering over 10,000 followers in a relatively short period.

The film's content focuses heavily on Elon Musk's actions and companies, which director Alex Gibney spent more than three years investigating. A significant portion of the documentary delves into Musk's political activities, including his involvement with DOGE and other ventures. This aspect of the film has likely contributed to the controversy surrounding its suppression.

The timing of the suspension is particularly striking, given that Bleecker Street had recently posted new content on the account, which included a post warning viewers to see the movie before it gets shut down.

TikTok's decision to permanently suspend the Musk" film account has raised concerns about suppression of content. The timing is striking, given that new content was posted just before the suspension, including a warning for viewers to see the movie before it gets shut down.

The move comes as TikTok continues to maintain its distance from Elon Musk's content, despite being partly owned by Larry Ellison, who makes an appearance in the documentary when he offers to pay billions to help finance Musk's Twitter acquisition. Unlike some of its competitors, TikTok has refused to accept ads for the film trailer, even after reversing its stance on other occasions. The suspension also highlights the contrast with X, which has consistently declined to advertise the film.

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/musk-movie-tiktok-banned-theaters-showtimes-1236734308/

Varsha Yajman, now in recovery from anorexia, recounts how as a teenager she was drawn into a world of unrealistic expectations on social media. Endless videos promising unattainable fitness goals flooded her feeds, while users competed with each other by sharing their weight and hospitalization records.

She remembers spending hours watching strangers document their daily food intake online, which led to her developing an unhealthy obsession with monitoring what she ate herself. I would find myself thinking I didn't need to eat if I could just watch others do it, Varsha says.

This pattern of behavior is eerily familiar to many young people who struggle with body image issues and eating disorders. As a result, the Australian government has proposed a new set of laws aimed at protecting vulnerable users from the toxic effects of social media algorithms.

The centrepiece of these reforms is an algorithm switch that would allow users to turn off recommended content. This means they would only see posts from accounts they follow, rather than being constantly bombarded with curated material designed to keep them engaged for as long as possible.

The proposed legislation is a significant step towards making social media companies more accountable for the harm their algorithms can cause. However, critics argue that existing algorithm controls are often ineffective and come with trade-offs in app functionality.

Australia's new laws would also impose a legal duty of care on online services, which would require them to prioritize user well-being above profits. The government hopes this will help Australians become happier and healthier by reducing their exposure to toxic content.

The proposed reforms in Australia have sparked debate about their feasibility and potential impact on free speech.

Critics of the government's plan argue that it is overly ambitious and may not be able to effectively regulate the complex algorithms used by social media platforms.

Some experts warn that trying to intervene directly in the workings of these algorithms could lead to unintended consequences, such as limiting access to certain types of content or hindering innovation.

Flynn Martin's experience with social media algorithms serves as a cautionary tale about the potential dangers of being sucked into an echo chamber.

The 20-year-old was overwhelmed by misogynistic and extremist content on his feeds, which exploited his insecurities and vulnerability during a difficult time in his life.

He eventually became embroiled in online controversies that went viral in Australia, including a rant about being a straight white male and criticism of someone's frozen yoghurt order.

Flynn acknowledges that social media alone was not the sole cause of his problems but believes it played a significant role in exacerbating them.

Research has been shedding light on the darker side of social media, revealing its potential to trigger brain responses similar to those experienced by individuals struggling with addiction.

Studies have shown that algorithms, often operating behind the scenes, serve up content that can be detrimental to users' mental health. Furthermore, these platforms have been accused of spreading disinformation and exacerbating polarization, leading to offline violence.

The notion that tech companies are aware of these issues but choose to overlook them in pursuit of increased user engagement and profits has been a recurring theme in court cases and whistleblower testimonies.

Critics argue that by prioritizing user engagement over well-being, social media platforms create an environment where outrageous or emotionally charged content is promoted, encouraging users to continue scrolling.

Activist Chanel Contos, who helped reform sexual consent education standards in Australia, has taken a stand against these practices. While studying the topic at university, she conceived of a campaign aimed at giving users more control over their social media experience.

Contos's "Fix Our Feeds initiative called for default-off algorithms and the option to opt into personalized content recommendations. The campaign gained significant traction, attracting over 15,000 signatures and endorsements from influential figures in Australian politics and beyond.

The government has taken notice of Contos's efforts, announcing plans to introduce an algorithm switch, albeit one that would allow users to choose whether to enable personalized content recommendations rather than defaulting to off.

The proposed Digital Duty of Care bill has sparked debate about online safety, particularly regarding children's exposure to harmful content on social media platforms.

The government's policy aims to create a safer online environment by requiring online services to protect users from harmful material and design features that could cause physical or psychological harm. This includes blocking access to explicit content such as pornography and restricting material promoting eating disorders or sexist attitudes.

In addition, the bill would also shield adults from seriously harmful" material and conduct. However, a narrower list of illegal content is defined for adult protection, indicating a distinction between what is considered acceptable for minors versus adults.

Communications Minister Anika Wells emphasized that the digital duty of care addresses concerns related to social media's minimum age law by applying a broader scope to all online services. This shift in responsibility would place the burden on big tech operators rather than victims.

The response from major technology companies has been muted, with Meta, Snap, TikTok, X, and Google declining to comment on the legislation. No public statements have been made regarding the bill's potential impact on their business models or user experiences.

Instagram's Adam Mosseri recently suggested that non-algorithmic feeds would lead to users seeing fewer posts from friends, implying a trade-off between algorithm-driven content curation and social interactions. He also disputed claims of addiction, citing a distinction between casual use and clinical addiction.

Right-wing parties in Australia have expressed concerns about the algorithms proposal and the broader bill, arguing that they could result in over-moderation and censorship.

The proposed algorithms control in Australia has sparked debate among lawmakers and experts about its feasibility and effectiveness.

Defenders of the law argue that it will not restrict users' freedom to follow who they want or share their opinions online.

According to proponents, adults can still engage with content from various sources without restriction, such as listening to podcasts or sharing memes.

This stance suggests that the proposed policy aims to strike a balance between promoting online safety and preserving individual freedoms.

Despite concerns about over-moderation and censorship, the public and online safety experts seem more receptive to the algorithms control proposal than Australia's social media ban for children.

However, there are questions about how Australia will implement this policy given its struggles with enforcing the social media ban for minors.

Surveys indicate that many children who were on social media before the ban still have active accounts, and no fines have been issued so far.

The EU's experience in 2023 serves as a cautionary tale, where platforms rolled out following-only feeds in response to algorithm controls but saw low take-up of safety features by users.

Experts point out that social media firms often implement required changes in a way that is clunky and inconvenient for users, making them stick with the default algorithmic experience.

Contos' campaign has gained momentum, leading her to take it to a global scale. She believes that countries like Canada, Australia, and the UK share similar concerns about online safety. If these nations implement algorithmic changes, it could create a critical mass effect, prompting other countries to follow suit.

Flynn and Varsha, two young women who have been vocal about their struggles with social media algorithms, are cautiously optimistic about the Digital Duty of Care bill in Australia. However, Varsha is skeptical that Australia can effectively counterbalance the influence of big tech companies. Flynn also expressed concerns about the feasibility of the algorithm switch.

A recent poll revealed that nearly two-thirds of Gen-Z Australians would keep their social media algorithms intact, despite being offered an off-switch option. Conversely, almost half of all Australians surveyed preferred to turn off their algorithms. This mixed response highlights the complexity of implementing change in this area.

Varsha acknowledges that she is unlikely to use the algorithm switch herself but appreciates having the choice as a safety net. She feels reassured knowing that on bad days, when she's more susceptible to online manipulation, she can opt out of the algorithmic feed. This perspective underscores the importance of providing users with control over their social media experience.

The introduction of an off-switch for algorithms marks a significant step towards giving users greater autonomy and agency in navigating online content. By acknowledging the potential for algorithmic harm, Australia is setting a precedent that could inspire other countries to follow suit and prioritize user well-being.

BBC News Technology: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwr7y8er1n8vo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The claims surfaced when comic George Brett Olson posted a video detailing how an AI Instagram account, with over 300,000 followers, had seemingly copied his routine without permission. The AI's avatar was remarkably realistic, featuring a female character that closely resembled Olson in appearance and attire, including the same venue background.

Olson's joke, which he claimed was stolen by the AI, ironically focused on the threat of AI to jobs and the involvement of billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg. This unexpected twist has left many in the comedy community stunned.

The AI, which also has an OnlyFans page, is one of several "sexy" AI comedians that have been generating significant views on social media.

Stand-up comedian Julia Jasunas has been highlighting a concerning trend on social media, where AI-generated comedians are stealing jokes from real-life performers and using them to promote their own OnlyFans pages.

Jasunas recently shared a side-by-side comparison of one such AI account with 250,000 followers and her original joke, pointing out the exact wording and even a random aside that she had made during a performance. The AI-generated comic's joke was almost identical to hers, complete with a reference to Lara Croft in Daisy Duke shorts.

The issue is not isolated to Jasunas alone, as UK comedy news site Chortle discovered multiple examples of stolen jokes on the same AI account. Comics such as Char Ramtin, Olivia Carter, and Hannah Berner have also had their content ripped off by the AI-generated comedian.

Jasunas expressed her concern that these AI bots are not only stealing from real comedians but also using scantily clad AI-generated women to perform the stolen jokes. This tactic is then used to generate profit from views and engagement, with the ultimate goal of directing fans towards an OnlyFans account for additional revenue.

The situation has sparked debate about the ethics of AI-generated content, particularly in the context of comedy and entertainment. As Jasunas pointed out, it's not just a matter of intellectual property theft but also a reflection of societal issues, such as the objectification of women and the exploitation of fans.

Meta's handling of original content has come under fire from comic creators who claim their work is being stolen by AI fakes to push OnlyFans pages.

The issue extends beyond Meta's platforms, with similar concerns raised on other social media sites such as YouTube and Tiktok. The proliferation of AI-generated content that mimics human creativity has left many wondering how to distinguish between authentic and fake material.

In a statement, Instagram chief Adam Mosseri acknowledged the challenges of policing AI content but emphasized the company's commitment to promoting original creators. He noted that while some AI-generated content may not be inherently malicious, it can still cause problems when it involves wholesale copying of existing work.

Mosseri hinted at exploring potential solutions with his team, suggesting that Meta could take steps to address the issue if an AI creator is found to be ripping off content without permission. However, he also highlighted the difficulties in identifying and distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate AI-generated material.

As the debate around AI-generated content continues, comic creators are increasingly frustrated by the lack of support from social media platforms like Meta. They argue that the platform's failure to address the issue reflects a broader societal problem, with some accusing Meta of exacerbating issues such as objectification and exploitation.

Comics are advising fans to support their work by attending live shows rather than watching pre-recorded clips online. Jasunas emphasizes that comedians post stand-up clips on social media to promote their live performances, not as a substitute for them.

These videos are meant to be experienced in person, where the nuances and energy of the performance can be fully appreciated. If viewers are watching these AI-generated clips without realizing they're being served rehearsed jokes, they should consider taking a step back and attending a live comedy show instead.

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/ai-comedians-stealing-stand-up-jokes-instagram-onlyfans-1236732931/

In an Instagram post earlier this week, Che expressed his frustration about the upcoming questions he'll face while promoting his new Netflix stand-up special, Michael Che: Shot in Minnesota. He joked that every question would be about Shane Gillis' recent controversy on Saturday Night Live.

Gillis faced backlash after a joke he made during his hosting stint on SNL last weekend sparked outrage. The comedian's comment was directed at women who work out and how they dress afterwards.

The joke itself implied that women wear revealing clothing, specifically shorts with bright colors and wrinkles around the cheeks, which some interpreted as objectifying and sexist. Gillis acknowledged the controversy in a somewhat apologetic tone.

Che's Instagram post hinted at his own potential involvement in addressing the issue, but he didn't elaborate further on what he plans to say or do about it.

The controversy surrounding Shane Gillis' recent monologue on Saturday Night Live has sparked heated discussions among fans and critics alike.

In a separate interview, Michael Che, who co-anchors "Weekend Update alongside Colin Jost, was asked to weigh in on the issue during an appearance on the Today show.

Che downplayed the significance of the controversy, stating that comedy is subjective and what one person finds funny, another might not. He emphasized that his role as a comedian is to make people laugh, even if it means pushing boundaries.

When asked specifically about whether he laughed at Gillis' joke about women, Che revealed that he was too focused on preparing for the next segment of Weekend Update" and didn't actually see the joke until the next day.

Che's comments have sparked some backlash, with fans questioning why he wouldn't speak out against Gillis' joke publicly. However, he defended his actions by pointing out that he has been involved in similar controversies during his own comedy career.

In response to a fan on Instagram who asked him to explain his double standard, Che clarified that he usually addresses personal issues privately rather than through the media. He emphasized the importance of treating others with courtesy and respect, even when disagreeing with their views or actions.

The controversy surrounding Shane Gillis' monologue on Saturday Night Live has sparked outrage among several celebrities, including Dan Levy. The Schitt's Creek co-creator and star took to Instagram to express his disappointment, stating that women wearing short shorts at the gym do not make them whores, but rather the men calling them such.

Levy emphasized the importance of recognizing the difference between a joke and a misogynistic comment, highlighting the need for men to speak out against such behavior. He also noted that complacency has contributed to the environment in which women are sexually assaulted, and that it's time to have a serious conversation about this issue rather than trivializing it.

Other celebrities have joined in on the criticism, with Ego Nwodim posting a photo of herself at the gym with a tongue-in-cheek caption. The collective response from these individuals underscores the need for greater awareness and respect towards women, particularly in public spaces like gyms where they should feel safe and comfortable.

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/snl-michael-che-reacts-shane-gillis-controversial-monologue-1236733370/

Yadegari shared insights into Cal AI's surprising success at TechCrunch Disrupt on Thursday. The company was founded in 2024 and quickly gained momentum thanks to a strategic social media approach that leveraged the power of influencers.

A key turning point came when an influencer posted about Cal AI, resulting in approximately a thousand new users signing up over just two days. This early success sparked a realization among the team that partnering with influencers could be a highly effective marketing strategy.

To capitalize on this discovery, Yadegari and his team began aggressively recruiting influencers to promote Cal AI, paying them to post about the app as quickly as possible. The results were impressive, with each influencer's posts yielding a consistent number of new users who converted into customers.

As the campaign took off, it became clear that there was a direct correlation between the number of influencer posts and the resulting user acquisition. With this formula in place, Cal AI saw rapid growth, ultimately generating over $30 million in revenue in just two years before being acquired by MyFitnessPal for an undisclosed amount.

The key to Cal AI's rapid growth was not just its innovative formula, but also its strategic approach to influencer marketing. The company negotiated rates with influencers, promising them certain payouts for a specific scale of reach. This strategy proved effective, as many influencers were willing to collaborate in exchange for cash.

To maximize the impact of their influencer partnerships, Cal AI focused on finding influencers with tight-knit communities that could be easily tracked and measured. By partnering with these individuals, the company was able to accurately quantify the reach and engagement generated by each campaign.

Yadegari's family played a significant role in his entrepreneurial journey, providing him with the freedom to pursue his ambitions without financial constraints. In fact, he credited them for giving him the opportunity to take risks and invest in his ideas. This support allowed him to focus on building Cal AI into a successful business.

In contrast, Yadegari expressed skepticism about the value of higher education, suggesting that it is primarily a social experience rather than a means of acquiring practical skills or knowledge. He stated that attending college was more about having fun and being part of a community than about preparing for a career.

Following the success of Cal AI, Yadegari has turned his attention to his new startup, Persona, which aims to make computing seamless with human life. The company's personal AI assistant will be accessible anywhere with an internet connection, including through messaging apps, emails, and phone calls.

The company's AI assistant will be accessible anywhere with an internet connection, including through messaging apps, emails, and phone calls.

This flexibility is expected to make the personal AI assistant a seamless part of users' daily lives, allowing them to interact with it in various ways and at their convenience. The assistant's availability on multiple platforms will also enable users to access its features from anywhere, whether they are at home, work, or on-the-go.

The launch of this AI-powered tool marks an exciting development in the field of artificial intelligence, as it brings advanced conversational capabilities to a wider audience and opens up new possibilities for personalization and productivity.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/15/when-it-came-to-cal-ais-viral-success-a-small-army-of-influencers-paid-off/

The events of that fateful night are still etched in Brandon's memory like a knife. He recalls his last conversation with Gavin before he went to bed, but even now, it haunts him. I'm not sure what I said exactly, he says, struggling to recall the words.

Brandon had been busy that evening, attending a local event and preparing for an upcoming election as a Republican candidate for South Carolina's House of Representatives. The heat of the summer night in Rock Hill was still palpable when he returned home around midnight.

The house was quiet, with only the sounds of crickets and frogs breaking the silence from outside. His wife, Melissa, had already gone to bed, and their two younger sons, Callahan and Coen, were fast asleep along with the family dogs. The only one still awake was Gavin, chatting with friends on his gaming headset.

Gavin's life seemed idyllic at that moment - he had just finished high school and was looking forward to starting college to pursue his dream of becoming an art teacher. His father recalls him as a young man who was confident in himself and not trying to please anyone else.

But little did Brandon know, their quiet evening would soon turn into a nightmare. A phone call came in that changed everything - one that he wishes had never been answered. In the following hour, Gavin's world descended into darkness.

A seemingly innocent friend request on Instagram from BellaJanet28 marked the beginning of the end for Gavin. His father still can't bring himself to read their conversation, but it's clear that BellaJanet28 was anything but genuine. She convinced Gavin to send intimate photos and then demanded money in exchange for not sharing them with his contacts.

The sextortion attempt sent shockwaves through the family, leaving Brandon feeling helpless and guilty for not being there when his son needed him most. The trauma of losing a child is something no parent should ever have to endure, but Brandon's resolve has only grown stronger since that day.

As he reflects on that fateful night, Brandon is left with more questions than answers - questions about the last words they exchanged and what could have been done to prevent Gavin's tragic fate. The pain of losing a child still lingers, but it's also fueling his fight for justice and change in how social media companies protect their young users.

The memories of that fateful night still haunt Guffey. He recalls seeing his son Gavin on the landing around 1:30 am, before a loud crash echoed from the bathroom where Gavin lay on the floor. The smell of gunpowder and blood seeping into his socks are etched in his mind forever.

Guffey's experience has driven him to become a leading advocate for child online safety. As a South Carolina state representative, he has successfully championed new safeguarding measures. Just one year after Gavin's death, "Gavin's Law" was passed in the state, making sextortion a felony and mandating education about it in all schools.

The law is just one of several reforms Guffey has pushed through. Last year, he won approval for stricter regulations on social media companies operating in South Carolina. These rules require parental permission for accounts held by users under 16 and prohibit direct marketing, infinite scroll, and automatic video playback, all associated with prolonged screen time.

Guffey's efforts have also led to the creation of a non-profit organization called Less Than 3. This initiative campaigns on online safety issues and provides support to families affected by such tragedies. Guffey regularly shares his son's story in schools, churches, and community centers as part of this work.

In addition to his advocacy, Guffey has written a book about his experiences titled Tomorrow Needs You. The book is a hard-hitting, honest account that delves into the guilt he feels over not being able to protect his son.

Guffey's transition from business to politics was marked by his entry into the county council in 2020. This move towards a seat in the statehouse coincided with Gavin's online antics going viral during the election campaign.

Guffey attributes some of Gavin's behavior to the pressures of social media. He recalls giving his son a speech about the importance of maintaining a good family name, but Gavin's actions on Twitter/X suggest that he didn't always heed this advice.

The image of Gavin mooning beside LaMelo Ball's Lamborghini went viral after it was posted on Twitter/X. Guffey remembers having to address the incident publicly and the subsequent fallout for his son.

Guffey also shares how Gavin had seen friends lose college scholarships due to online mistakes. This experience seemed to have convinced Gavin that nothing he did online would ever truly disappear.

Grief and guilt weighed heavily on Guffey's shoulders as he struggled to come to terms with his son's tragic death.

The experience had left him questioning his own parenting skills and wondering if there was anything more he could have done to prevent the tragedy.

Growing up, Guffey himself was raised by a tough teenage mother who instilled in him a strong sense of masculinity from an early age.

She taught him that boys don't cry and that you should always be able to suck it up whatever happens, which became a deeply ingrained mindset that stayed with him into adulthood.

This emphasis on toughness had a profound impact on Guffey's relationships and interactions with his own son, Gavin.

The gun used in the tragic event belonged to Guffey, who had taken it on a camping trip for protection and left it on a high shelf intending to lock it away.

It was only later that he learned about the alarming statistic that when there is a gun involved in a suicide attempt, the decision can be made in as little as three minutes.

This revelation shook Guffey to his core, and he has since taken steps to rid himself of any firearms in his home.

In hindsight, it's clear that Guffey's focus on protecting his family from external threats had blinded him to the dangers that could arise from within.

The loss of his son had a profound impact on Guffey's perspective and behavior, causing him to reevaluate his priorities and relationships.

As he navigated this difficult time, Guffey found solace in the support of his community, which rallied around him and his family with kindness and compassion.

From the night Gavin's death occurred, their house became a hub of activity as neighbors and friends brought food, helped with household chores, and cared for four-year-old Callahan, demonstrating the power of human connection in times of need.

This outpouring of support was not limited to people Guffey knew well; even those he disagreed with on political issues came forward to offer their assistance, highlighting the common humanity that transcends ideological differences.

One of the most significant sources of comfort for Guffey was meeting Gavin's friends and hearing their stories about his son's life.

Just 48 hours after Gavin's death, Guffey organized a gathering at a local community space where those who had known him could share their memories and experiences with him.

The event provided a unique opportunity for Guffey to gain a more complete understanding of his son's personality and behavior, which in turn helped him process his grief.

Among the stories shared by Gavin's friends was the revelation that he would often pick them up from late-night gatherings, rather than going to the gym as Guffey had assumed.

Gavin also had a habit of giving away his clothes, and sometimes those of others, to friends in need, which explained why so many items seemed to go missing over time.

Two days before what would have been Gavin's 18th birthday, a message from BellaJanet30 landed in Guffey's inbox, claiming his son had begged for his life. The message was accompanied by a laughing face emoji, which only fueled Guffey's determination to track down the perpetrator.

Guffey responded with a stern warning, vowing to find and expose the individual responsible for his son's sextortion. He made it clear that he would not rest until justice was served. This exchange marked a turning point in Guffey's journey towards becoming an advocate for online safety.

The prospect of running for office had become daunting, but Melissa's unwavering support gave him the courage to persevere. She urged him to use his experience to make a difference and prevent others from falling victim to online scams. Her words struck a chord within Guffey, reigniting his passion for public service.

Guffey's newfound mission has not only helped him cope with his loss but has also given him a sense of purpose. He is now better equipped to tackle the complex issue of sextortion, having gained valuable insights into its mechanisms and tactics. This knowledge allows him to effectively campaign for changes in laws and regulations that protect children online.

Guffey is adamant that social media platforms should be held accountable for the content they carry. He believes that repealing section 230 in the US would be a significant step towards making tech companies prioritize child safety over profits. By taking responsibility for their actions, Guffey argues, these companies can prevent further tragedies like Gavin's.

The investigation into BellaJanet28 was a painstaking process, requiring immense patience and perseverance from law enforcement agencies. Guffey had to wait anxiously as agents worked tirelessly to gather evidence, including tracing financial transactions linked to the suspect's account.

A breakthrough finally came when bank verification numbers were obtained, allowing authorities to track down the individual responsible for Gavin's sextortion. This development brought a sense of relief and hope that justice would soon be served.

In January 2025, Hassanbunhussein Abolore Lawal was extradited from Nigeria and appeared in court in Columbia, South Carolina. Guffey and his wife Melissa were present to witness the proceedings, where Lawal pleaded not guilty to charges including child exploitation resulting in death.

The pretrial is scheduled for December, but for Guffey, this marks a significant milestone in his quest for justice. He continues to advocate for reforms that will protect children from online predators, driven by the memory of his son and the determination to prevent similar tragedies in the future.

Guffey has witnessed a change in the dynamics of the calls he receives since his son's passing. Initially, most callers were teenagers who had fallen prey to online scams, and Guffey would try to persuade them to confide in their parents. However, there is now a shift, with more parents reaching out to him after discovering that their own children have been victimized.

The influx of calls from concerned parents indicates a growing awareness about the issue among families. Despite this progress, Guffey still feels that his efforts fall short of making a tangible impact. His work remains ongoing, driven by the memory of his son and an unrelenting desire to prevent similar tragedies from occurring in the future.

The Guardian Life and Style: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/oct/14/brandon-guffey-gavin-killed-himelf-online-scam-sextortionist

This move is seen as a response to the growing threat posed by these platforms, which have become increasingly popular among younger audiences. The proliferation of short-form videos has led streaming services to experiment with new formats that can capture viewers' attention on mobile devices.

However, a new startup called Vurt is taking a different approach. Rather than focusing solely on mobile viewing experiences, the company is now targeting smart TVs with its dedicated apps for Apple TV and Android TV.

Vurt's user base has grown significantly since launching in March, expanding from 10,000 to 675,000 users who can access over 3,500 episodes across more than 100 different shows.

Vurt's development team is taking user feedback seriously, driving their push into dedicated TV apps. The decision was prompted by users' desire to watch vertical videos on larger screens from their phones. This led Vurt to develop a feature allowing casting to smart TVs.

The company signs licensing agreements with production studios and creators, offering them a 50/50 revenue split. This deal benefits both parties and allows Vurt to build its library of content. Independent creators can also submit their projects directly for distribution on the platform.

Once approved, new content is available to stream within just a few days. This streamlined process highlights Vurt's focus on being fair to its users and creators alike. The company prioritizes user experience, taking cues from feedback to inform its development strategy.

Vurt's reliance on ad partnerships means that viewers can watch all content for free without dealing with microtransactions. This "free-to-finish model is a key part of the platform's corporate philosophy, aiming to be fair to both users and creators.

Vurt's expansion into television is not just about adapting to changing viewer habits but also about staying true to its core philosophy of creating engaging content that doesn't require expensive production equipment or large budgets for talent and crew.

The company's free-to-finish" model has been a key part of this approach, allowing creators to produce high-quality vertical videos without the financial burden of traditional filmmaking. This model is designed to be fair to both users and creators, giving viewers access to quality content while also providing opportunities for emerging talent to shine.

As Vurt prepares to launch its TV apps, it's clear that the company is not trying to compete directly with established platforms like Instagram or YouTube. Instead, it's focused on carving out a niche for itself in the market by emphasizing vertical content and innovative storytelling techniques.

Consultations with content creators have revealed that many prefer watching films and TV shows on big screens due to the immersive experience they provide. However, Vurt argues that vertical microdramas can be just as engaging whether watched on a phone or television screen, offering a unique kind of immersion through their non-traditional storytelling approach.

According to Sorey, creators believe that vertical content can offer a distinct type of immersive experience even when viewed on a wide-screen television. This is due in part to the way vertical videos tell stories, often using unconventional narrative structures and visual styles that are optimized for mobile viewing but still effective on larger screens.

Vurt's content has been criticized for its formulaic plots and short episode lengths, but these elements seem to contribute to its engaging nature.

The company has reported an increase in overall engagement time among viewers using their TV apps, suggesting that users are drawn to the convenience of watching vertical videos without having to pick up their phones.

This trend is notable, especially when considering how other platforms are experimenting with turning all content into endless feeds of vertical videos.

The Verge: https://www.theverge.com/entertainment/1008720/vurt-microdramas-verticals-interview-hilmon-sorey

The video, which mocked the removal of Jha's name and those of his family members from a voter list in West Bengal, had garnered 1.7 million views since its posting on September 29. The comedian alleged in the video that India's Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar was working at the behest of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to disenfranchise millions of voters.

The removal of Jha's video from Instagram came two days after its posting, with Meta citing "local laws as the reason. The move has raised concerns about censorship and the government's increasing use of social media platforms to suppress dissenting voices.

Jha, a Mumbai-based artist, expressed his frustration at having his work removed from Instagram, saying that he felt helpless when it happened. He noted that voting is the only right that citizens have in India, and without it, they are left with nothing.

The removal of Jha's video comes amid growing protests against the Modi government, which are being fueled by an investigation by the Indian Express newspaper revealing concerns about a controversial revision of voter rolls conducted by the election commission.

The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, launched in June last year, aims to identify and remove deceased, duplicate or dubious voters from India's electoral rolls.

Critics of the SIR process point out that it has already deleted over 130 million voters, nearly 14 percent of India's total electorate. The majority of these deletions are believed to be Muslims, who traditionally do not vote for Modi's Hindu nationalist party. This has raised concerns about voter suppression and electoral manipulation.

Two election commissioners had formally objected at least 14 times to key decisions taken by the SIR exercise's chief. Opposition politicians and critics accuse Kumar, a Modi government appointee, of acting in favor of the ruling BJP. They demand an independent inquiry into the decisions made during his tenure as election commissioner.

Protests against the alleged electoral manipulation have erupted across India, with demonstrators demanding Kumar's resignation. The main opposition leader, Rahul Gandhi, was briefly detained by police in New Delhi on Tuesday while trying to march to the election commission office.

Protesters took to the streets again on Wednesday, continuing their demonstrations against the government's actions.

The opposition parties have been accused by the BJP of trying to overthrow the current administration through a coordinated effort.

A BJP spokesperson claimed that the protesters are intentionally targeting India's democratic institutions and constitution.

The protests were sparked by the satirical Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and left-wing students in Mumbai and New Delhi, who began demonstrating on October 2.

Their creative use of humor, art, and music to express dissent has been a notable aspect of these protests.

In response to the demonstrations, the government has issued an increasing number of content-blocking orders to social media platforms.

According to one report, nearly 195,000 blocking requests were made between March and July this year, averaging one request every 68 seconds.

The Indian government's new rules governing online content have led to a significant increase in censorship of satirical works. Since February, social media platforms have been required to remove content deemed unlawful by a government authority or court within three hours.

Several artists have fallen victim to this crackdown, including political cartoonist Satish Acharya. His Instagram account was blocked in India from September 28 until late on October 5 after several of his cartoons were removed.

The removals included some of Acharya's older works, dating back up to three years. The move has been seen as an attempt by the government to suppress dissenting voices and limit freedom of expression.

Stand-up comic Jha also expressed support for the growing protests against the Modi government.

Indian comedian Jha has made it clear that he will not attempt to have his name reinstated on the voters' list following his recent criticism of the government's handling of online content. His decision comes as a result of the growing crackdown on dissenting voices in India.

In a satirical message aimed directly at Prime Minister Modi, Jha urged him to reconsider the restrictive measures being taken against artists and comedians like himself. He jokingly asked Modi to give back his right to vote and reminded him that his reputation for having a 56-inch chest" should not be used as an excuse to stifle dissent.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/9/satire-silenced-indian-artists-face-censorship-as-anti-modi-protests-grow?traffic_source=rss

Phage therapy's effectiveness is hindered by the fact that bacteria are not defenseless against these viral attacks and possess their own immune systems. To overcome this challenge, scientists need to understand how bacteria recognize and respond to viral infections, a crucial step in developing therapeutic phages that can evade bacterial defenses.

Scientists have made significant progress in identifying key mechanisms of bacterial immunity. A recent study has shed light on one of the primary ways bacteria detect a viral attack: by sensing damage to specific molecules within their cells caused by viral enzymes.

The discovery was described as a major breakthrough by researchers, who say it could lead to more effective phage therapies capable of bypassing bacterial immune defenses and targeting resistant microbes. According to Dr Sam Hobbs, assistant professor of biochemistry at University of Utah Health, the finding marked a significant moment in understanding bacterial immunity.

The study on CBASS, a bacterial immune system, revealed an intricate defense mechanism against viral attacks.

When triggered, CBASS activates a last-resort response where the infected bacterium self-destructs before allowing the virus to spread.

To prevent unnecessary self-destruction, the system must accurately identify genuine viral threats with high precision.

This detection process relies on a signal generated by the virus itself, which is essential for the bacterial immune system's function.

The signal is produced by certain phages that release an enzyme called protease, which degrades other proteins and acts directly on host proteins.

The discovery of how bacteria defend themselves against phages has significant implications for understanding human immunity.

CBASS, an immune pathway found in humans, is linked to this bacterial defense mechanism, suggesting that it has been present across a vast evolutionary timeline. This connection indicates that the pathway dates back to the common ancestor shared by bacteria and humans, highlighting its fundamental importance in antiviral defense.

Bacteria offer researchers a unique experimental system for studying immunity due to their rapid life cycles. This allows scientists to quickly investigate immune processes and test their findings in biological models more closely related to humans, providing valuable insights into human immunity.

The fact that this pathway has been conserved between bacteria and humans over billions of years underscores its critical role in fighting viruses.

The research team's findings highlight a unique mechanism by which bacteria can turn a virus's own defense strategy against it.

This process involves a molecular pathway that allows bacteria to activate a protein called RIG-I, which is typically used by the body to recognize and respond to viral infections. The activation of RIG-I triggers an immune response in the host cells, ultimately leading to the destruction of the virus-infected cells. This discovery has significant implications for our understanding of how viruses interact with their hosts.

The fact that this pathway has been conserved between bacteria and humans over billions of years underscores its critical role in fighting viruses.

ScienceDaily Health: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/10/261007042100.htm

Our videos quickly gained traction online, racking up over 4 million followers on Instagram. We'd create short comedy skits together, and people loved them. It was during this time that we decided to make a documentary about my life, compiling my bucket list along the way.

One of the items on my list was breaking a world record, something outrageous yet fun and inclusive. Ross and I spent months brainstorming ideas before settling on crowd surfing at a music event. He has connections in the music industry, including country singer Brantley Gilbert, who agreed to help us make it happen.

We initially planned for me to be strapped into a board designed by Ross to protect my back during the crowd surfing. However, this proved too flexible, and we had to switch to a stretcher instead. The plan was to move me in a straight line from the back of the crowd to the front at Brantley Gilbert's show in Bellville, Texas.

On the day of the event, I was 99 years and 274 days old. To break the record, I needed to stay on my feet for at least 10 seconds while being carried by the crowd. The initial plan was to move me through a packed main crowd, but we encountered an unexpected problem just before we were due to start.

It turned out that everyone in the main crowd was sitting in chairs with gaps between them, which wouldn't have been conducive to moving someone on a stretcher. Ross started panicking as our time was running out, and we had to think quickly to salvage the situation.

We decided to use the mosh pit instead, where the crowd would be more densely packed and able to move me in a U-shape from stage right to stage left. This change of plan ultimately led to my record-breaking moment, but it wasn't without its challenges and uncertainties.

As I was being launched out into the crowd, I felt a rush of exhilaration, as if I was flying through the air. My trust in everyone around me allowed me to let go and enjoy the experience. Meanwhile, Ross back on stage panicked at the sight of the 10ft gap between the walkway's two sides, with a high fence that my board had to be passed over.

The security team sprang into action, carefully carrying me across the obstacle, holding me up for what felt like an eternity, nearly three minutes. The music continued uninterrupted as I was passed from one set of hands to another. Despite the chaos, I remained serene, feeling free and unencumbered.

When I finally returned to the stage, the crowd erupted into cheers, chanting my name in unison. I stood tall, drinking in the adoration, feeling a shiver run down my spine as the applause washed over me. It was a moment I would never forget.

Ross's creative genius is what drives our videos, with him often joking that he's Steven Spielberg and I'm the star of the show, much to my amusement. But it wasn't until one day at the grocery store when people approached me asking for photos that I realized just how popular we'd become.

The recognition was soon official: I was awarded a Guinness World Record for being the oldest person to crowd surf at a concert, a moment that will forever be etched in my memory.

Living in Ohio has its advantages for me, especially now that I have more free time to devote to my newfound passion. As someone who grew up without modern conveniences like television and telephones, I've learned to appreciate simple pleasures.

My life took a dramatic turn when I started making videos with my grandson Ross. We'd meet people on red carpets and share their stories, which resonated with audiences worldwide. It was heartwarming to see how our content brought joy to those who watched it.

The feedback we received from fans has been incredible. People shared with us that they had reconnected with family members after watching our videos together. Some even credited our content with lifting them out of hospital beds, where they were feeling lonely and sad. It's moments like these that make all the hard work worth it.

Living with Ross in Ohio has brought a new dynamic to our relationship. Before, we would only see each other occasionally, but now we're together every day. I've been able to take on a more active role in his life, which has been incredibly fulfilling for both of us.

Reaching 100 years old was a milestone I never thought I'd achieve. This summer, I celebrated with not one, but two parties that drew hundreds of people. It's surreal to think about how far I've come from my childhood on the farm in Ohio.

The physical challenges of aging are undeniable, and some days can be quite painful. However, making videos with Ross gives me a sense of purpose, which helps me push through even the toughest days.

Living life to the fullest is a mantra that has become second nature for me after becoming the world's oldest crowd surfer at 99.

Making videos about my experiences gives me a sense of purpose and helps me push through even the toughest days, allowing me to live each moment with joy and enthusiasm.

The Guardian Life and Style: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/oct/09/experience-worlds-oldest-crowd-surfer-age-99

This emotional tone was short-lived, however, as Zuckerberg quickly transitioned into discussing the latest developments from Meta's research labs. The company has been working on agentic chatbots like Muse, which promises to revolutionize human-computer interaction. Also showcased were smart glasses and a quirky AI gadget inspired by Tamagotchis.

The absence of Instagram and Facebook from Zuckerberg's presentation was notable, given that these social media platforms are the foundation upon which Meta's $2 trillion valuation is built. Instead, the focus was on emerging technologies that aim to push the boundaries of human innovation.

For months, Meta has been at the center of controversy surrounding its alleged role in designing addictive products that harm young users. This has led to a slew of lawsuits and high-profile whistleblower testimony, with internal emails and documents being used as evidence by lawyers and prosecutors.

The negative publicity has had little impact on public opinion, however. A recent Pew Research Center poll found that two-thirds of Americans have an unfavorable view of Zuckerberg personally.

This perceived image problem is unlikely to be alleviated by the new film The Social Reckoning, which dramatizes whistleblower claims that Meta executives knew their products were harming young people. In a telling portrayal, actor Jeremy Strong plays Zuckerberg as a ruthless figure who prioritizes profits over social responsibility.

Some observers have likened this moment in time to the "Big Tobacco era, when public opinion turned against the tobacco industry due to its role in causing harm and deception. However, it seems that Meta's situation is more complex than a simple narrative of villainy versus virtue.

Despite the bad press, Meta's products continue to thrive, with user engagement on its apps reaching new heights. The company's AI assistant has already gained traction among users, who are eager to explore the possibilities offered by this emerging technology.

Despite a year of intense scrutiny over its handling of sensitive topics, Meta continues to thrive as a business entity. The company's resilience has led some to wonder if it has developed a reputation that is impervious to criticism.

Recent revelations have raised concerns about the safety and well-being of users on Meta's platforms. Last summer, reports emerged that the company had allowed its chatbots to engage in conversations with children that were deemed unsuitable for their age group. This led to changes in the company's policies, which now prohibit such interactions.

In addition to these internal issues, Meta has faced a series of high-profile lawsuits over the past year. In March, a jury awarded $6m to a 20-year-old woman who claimed that her use of Instagram and YouTube had caused her mental health problems. The case was significant not only for its financial award but also because it highlighted the potential risks associated with social media use.

Meta has been at the center of several other lawsuits in recent months, including one brought by New Mexico over child safety issues. A jury found that Meta had failed to warn the public about the dangers posed by its platforms and fined the company a total of $942m. The judge presiding over the case described Meta as a public nuisance akin to air pollution.

The company has also faced criticism for its handling of allegations related to social media addiction among young users. In May, Meta agreed to pay $9m to settle a lawsuit brought by a Kentucky school district that claimed the company's product design had contributed to a youth mental health crisis.

Meta struck an even larger settlement in the summer with 48 US states and several territories. The deal was worth $18bn and involved significant changes to the company's platform, including time limits for young users and night-time blocks on use. Meta denied any wrongdoing as part of the settlement but did agree to implement new safety measures.

The company still faces a number of ongoing lawsuits, including one scheduled to start later this month in Los Angeles. This case also relates to allegations of social media addiction among young users and is likely to continue the scrutiny of Meta's business practices in the coming months.

Several countries have taken drastic measures to protect their youth from social media's influence. In December last year, Australia became the first country to ban social media for children entirely. This move reflects a growing sentiment among governments worldwide to regulate social media companies and their impact on young users.

The distrust of tech giants is palpable, with many people questioning the ethics of these companies. A recent survey by Reuters/Ipsos found that 85% of Americans believe social media can be addictive for children, while 61% support increased government oversight. This widespread concern highlights the need for greater accountability from social media companies.

Associate Professor Alison Taylor of New York University's Stern School of Business has expressed her concerns about Meta's trust issue. She believes that once the public loses faith in a company, it can be difficult to regain. It feels like... the trust deficit is so big, I just don't know that they're going to be able to recover, she says.

Despite facing numerous challenges and controversies, Meta has reported an increase in user numbers for some of its apps, including Instagram and WhatsApp. The company saw a 3% year-on-year rise in users and a 28% boost in revenue during the second quarter compared to the same period last year.

Meta's decision to temper its pursuit of the teen market has been seen as a strategic move to mitigate potential risks. However, competitors like TikTok and YouTube are still more popular among young users. This indicates that while Meta may be adapting to changing circumstances, it is not yet immune to criticism.

The company's settlement with 48 states was widely regarded as a significant win for Meta. By avoiding testimony from top executives, including Zuckerberg, and preventing the release of internal documents, the company was able to sidestep admitting wrongdoing. The stock price surged immediately after the announcement, rising by 4%, and has since increased by over 25% in the last month.

Critics argue that Meta has been testing consumer tolerance for bad behavior and has so far managed to withstand the backlash. Patrick Moorhead, founder of Moor Insights & Strategy, believes that they're in a remarkably good position despite the challenges they face. This suggests that while social media companies may be facing criticism, their business models remain resilient.

Meta's AI personal assistant app, Muse, has been making waves since its launch last month. This app is significant because it's an AI agent, capable of carrying out multiple tasks over several hours, unlike chatbots that typically focus on a single task at a time.

The capabilities of Muse are impressive, as demonstrated by a New York Times tech reporter who used the app for two weeks. The app was able to automatically call his dental insurer, order groceries, and even track his credit card spending in a spreadsheet without any manual intervention from him.

However, to utilize all these features, users have to share sensitive information with Meta, including their credit card details, purchase history, and access to their email inbox. This raises concerns about the company's reputation on privacy, which has been marred by several controversies over the years.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal, which broke a decade ago, is one such instance where millions of Facebook users' data was compromised and used for political purposes without their consent. The incident damaged Meta's reputation and raised questions about its handling of user data.

Just days after Mark Zuckerberg's keynote at Meta Connect, another New Mexico jury found the company liable for misrepresenting how it uses personal information on Facebook. Meta has disputed this verdict, stating that it will defend itself against what it calls attempts to distort its record.

Despite these concerns, some users seem willing to share their data with Meta in exchange for the convenience offered by Muse. The app has gained over five million downloads and more than three million weekly active users since its launch a month ago, outpacing the adoption rate of ChatGPT when it was first introduced in the North American market.

Meta's vision is to integrate Muse with its line-up of AI smart glasses, allowing users to access personal superintelligence hands-free. The company seems committed to this initiative, and experts believe that Meta is making a strategic investment to position itself as a leader in this emerging category.

Forrester principal analyst Kate Winick notes that Meta's move into smart glasses is an attempt to own the market for now, regardless of its eventual size. This strategy suggests that the company is confident about its ability to adapt and evolve with changing user needs.

Meta's smart glasses have been met with skepticism and concern over their potential for covert filming, earning them the label of pervert glasses" from some critics.

The company has taken steps to mitigate this issue by disabling users' ability to tamper with the light that indicates a photo or video is being captured, in an effort to prevent misuse.

Despite these measures, concerns about user safety and privacy persist. Campaign groups, such as the Heat Initiative, continue to question Meta's commitment to protecting consumers' sensitive information.

One of the key concerns raised by critics is that users must opt into many of the company's promised protections, rather than having them enabled by default. This has led some to suggest that Meta may be prioritizing convenience over security.

In an effort to address these concerns, Mark Zuckerberg highlighted the personal virtual machine, a self-contained computer system running inside Meta's cloud that will store users' data securely. He assured customers that this system would keep their information safe and private.

However, recent reports have raised questions about the effectiveness of this system in protecting user data. Some social media users claim to have experienced issues with Muse, including unauthorized access to emails, which Meta has denied is possible without user consent.

The company's response to these allegations has been swift, with officials pushing back against claims that Muse can read emails without permission and emphasizing that any such actions would require explicit user consent.

As Meta continues to navigate its latest controversies, it's clear that users may be willing to make concessions on privacy if it means convenience and utility.

The company's significant revenue from social media advertising has been a major driver of its financial success, with recent figures showing $60.8bn in revenue and $15.9bn in profit for the second quarter of this year.

This consistent profitability has enabled Meta to invest heavily in new technologies such as the Metaverse and AI infrastructure, with a current long-term debt of $83.7bn according to its latest financial statement.

Despite these significant investments, Meta executives remain optimistic about the company's pivot towards AI, with Andrew Bosworth, chief technology officer, describing it as a key tool for achieving personal goals and objectives.

Ultimately, Meta's future will depend on whether users can trust the company to handle their data responsibly.

BBC News Business: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq8rzjv8g7ejo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The movie, titled Wicker, tells the story of a lonely fisherwoman living in a medieval village who seeks to escape her isolation by hiring a basketmaker to create a wicker partner for her.

At the London Film Festival premiere, Colman expressed surprise at the massive reaction she's witnessed online.

Colman revealed that this level of attention is unprecedented in her career, as she said no other film has ever sparked such a big response from audiences.

The film boasts an impressive cast, featuring actors like Alexander Skarsgård and Peter Dinklage.

The trailer for the upcoming film has sparked a viral sensation online, with fans from various platforms, including BookTok and FilmTok, expressing their enthusiasm over Alexander Skarsgård's character.

Ikea, the Swedish furniture giant, even got in on the action by posting photos of its rattan furniture on Instagram, captioning it "husband material in a nod to the film. The move has added fuel to the online buzz surrounding the movie.

Olivia Colman attributes the widespread interest and fascination with the wicker husband to people's desire for escapism. She notes that film provides an opportunity for audiences to immerse themselves in magical and fantastical worlds, which is particularly appealing during challenging times.

Colman also praised the originality of the script, stating that it stood out from other projects she had been sent. Her co-star, Debicki, shares a similar sentiment, agreeing that Skarsgård's character is a major factor in the film's online popularity.

The film's designers are being credited for creating a wicker man costume that has captured the attention of audiences worldwide.

Skarsgård's character is a major part of this phenomenon, and it seems the actor himself was not even aware of his impact on social media until recently.

As for the film itself, it explores the complexities of relationships through its portrayal of tender moments and sexy scenes.

The movie, based on The Wicker Husband by Ursula Wills-Jones, premiered at Sundance earlier this year to mixed reviews from critics.

The film's cast has spoken about its unexpected online popularity, but they also emphasize that it tackles deeper themes beyond its humorous surface.

Debicki describes the movie as very funny and strange and wonderful while also finding it moving, suggesting that viewers should look beyond the viral memes for a richer understanding of the story.

The actors highlight various aspects of the film's exploration, including social hierarchy and breaking societal rules, with Skarsgård noting that these themes are handled in a light touch".

BBC News Entertainment: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cry4xpyzl7qwo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Trump's company, Trump Media & Technology Group, owns and operates Truth Social, with the ex-president holding majority ownership stakes. This unique situation has raised questions about whether Trump can profit from selling early access to his posts, which often break news related to his administration.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has argued that there is no conflict in Trump charging for instant API access to his social media posts, suggesting that the value comes largely from his role as president. However, several news groups have filed lawsuits against Trump, alleging that his exorbitant fees violate various constitutional amendments and federal laws.

The lawsuits argue that Trump's charges create a tiered system of access to government information, favoring those who can pay top dollar for early access to his social media posts. This, they claim, undermines the First Amendment and the Presidential Records Act by creating arbitrary and irrational reasons for granting preferential access to crucial government information.

The DOJ countered these claims during a hearing on Wednesday, likening Trump's Truth Social posts to the "fireside chats" of former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The DOJ argued that Trump's personal feed serves as an unvarnished public service, rather than a profit-driven endeavor.

The judge will likely make a decision on this matter within the next few weeks, potentially setting a significant precedent for future government practices regarding social media and access to information.

The hearing's focus on the comparison between Trump's Truth Social API and President Roosevelt's fireside chats has raised eyebrows among observers.

Judge Oetken questioned whether charging for access to presidential announcements is comparable to FDR's broadcasts, suggesting that there are significant differences in how information was disseminated during those times.

Mayers' response pointed out that while Roosevelt didn't charge for his broadcasts, not everyone had equal access due to the cost of radios, which some Americans couldn't afford.

The judge's line of questioning has been seen as a challenge to the DOJ's argument that charging $100K per month for access to Truth Social posts is equivalent to FDR's model.

The judge's line of questioning has taken an interesting turn as he probed the value of early access to Truth Social posts.

Initially, Oetken seemed skeptical about claims that the API scheme violated the First Amendment, Courthouse News reported. He wondered aloud if a delay of potentially just a fraction of a second would have any meaningful impact on the free press. This raised questions about whether the government's argument was overstating the significance of timely access to information.

However, this line of questioning has been challenged by nonprofit news organizations who argue that there is more at stake than just timing. They point out that large news groups are already negotiating with TMTG for API access because it offers significant value beyond instant access to Truth Social posts.

The API provides a machine-readable feed and a historic archive of all President Trump's Truth Social posts, according to Sus. This means that even if Trump deletes posts, which he frequently does, news organizations can maintain a reliable log of his online activity.

News outlets use APIs for various purposes, not just algorithmic traders who stand to benefit from early access. The value of this service is undeniable, and it's not just about getting information before the general public.

The judge has decided not to make an immediate ruling on the case, opting instead for a written decision that will address whether Trump's company can sell API access to his posts while he is in office. The delay has given neither side reason to celebrate, with both parties eagerly awaiting the outcome.

Court observers have noted that requests for preliminary injunctions are typically treated with urgency, and it is expected that the judge will make a decision within the next few weeks. This has left news groups on tenterhooks as they wait for the court's ruling on whether Trump can continue to charge high fees for access to his posts.

The nonprofit news groups suing Trump's company have consistently argued that charging such high prices for API access is not only corrupt but also unconstitutional, given America's long history of providing equal access to presidential records. They claim this gives a direct advantage to newsrooms with deep pockets who can afford the expensive fees.

Trump's lawyer has defended his client's actions by arguing that the decision to charge for API access was a private commercial decision made solely by Trump Media & Technology Group, and not influenced by Trump himself. However, nonprofit groups have countered that this is a transparent attempt to shield Trump from accountability for his actions as president.

A court is currently deliberating on whether former President Trump can charge $100,000 for early access to his social media posts through the Truth Social platform's API. This move would allow news organizations to pay a hefty fee for real-time updates from the president, but experts warn of far-reaching consequences.

The potential precedent set by this decision could have significant implications for press access to government information, with nonprofit groups cautioning that it would create a barrier between journalists and official data. If approved, it's feared that more politicians might follow Trump's lead, further restricting public access to essential information.

Ars Technica: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/10/judge-weighs-if-trump-can-charge-100k-for-early-access-to-truth-social-posts/

In a series of clips from an episode of GQ's "One More Question series, the actor delves into his passion for technology, revealing that he has been interested in computers since he was young. Affleck discusses the development of AI as it relates to filmmaking, using technical terms like machine learning and neural networks with ease.

The actor's expertise extends beyond conversation, however, as he also claims to have some programming skills in Python. His ability to explain complex concepts, such as transformers and tensors, has left interviewer Zach Baron visibly impressed.

During the conversation, Affleck explains that his interest in AI began when film transitioned from analog to digital formats. He defines key terms for Baron's benefit, demonstrating a clear understanding of the underlying technology driving innovation in the field.

Ben Affleck's foray into artificial intelligence (AI) has left many impressed by his grasp of complex concepts. He began explaining that machine learning has been a key component in visual effects workflows for several years.

This led him to discuss the basics of programming languages, specifically Python scripts, which he jokingly referred to as shitty. Affleck's explanation centered around convolutional neural networks (CNNs), precursors to more advanced transformer technology.

These CNNs were used to identify patterns and perform tasks such as edge detection or feature extraction. According to Affleck, their primary function is to recognize specific elements within an image, like the position of a window ledge. This information can then be used to enhance post-production processes.

Affleck's interest in AI didn't stem solely from professional curiosity; he also used his celebrity status to gain access to emerging technology. He revealed that visits to companies like OpenAI helped him better understand the field and how he could contribute more directly.

In a separate clip, Affleck mentioned that these encounters ultimately led him to explore ways of getting involved in AI beyond just being an observer.

Ben Affleck's interest in AI goes beyond just observation, as he has been actively exploring ways to integrate it into filmmaking without replacing human creativity.

Affleck claims that his startup, which was sold for a reported $587 million, is not entirely accurate, as he did not own the entire company. This clarification comes after earlier discussions about the sale of his venture.

The filmmaker believes that creating an ethical AI system requires a custom-built dataset, rather than relying on existing ones. To achieve this, he raised funds and spent eight months capturing footage with multiple cameras and equipment to create a unique dataset for training open-source models.

Affleck's approach involves fine-tuning AI models by unfreezing their weights and teaching them to meet specific cinematic standards. This process allows filmmakers like him to retain control over their proprietary work while benefiting from the knowledge gained through AI-assisted training.

By creating their own custom-trained models, Affleck argues that artists can generate value without sacrificing their creative vision. His innovative approach to integrating AI into filmmaking continues to spark interest and discussion in the industry.

The use of AI in filmmaking has been gaining traction, and Ben Affleck's involvement in this process is one example of how the technology can be harnessed to enhance creative endeavors.

Affleck himself employed AI techniques in his movie Animals, where artificial intelligence played a role in post-production. This integration of AI into film production highlights the potential for collaboration between humans and machines in the creative industry.

Ben Affleck has also shared his thoughts on the concerns surrounding AI's impact on society, specifically its potential to exacerbate issues such as learned helplessness. He expressed these worries during a discussion on AI, emphasizing that he believes responsible use of the technology is crucial.

Affleck's views on AI's role in education and its potential consequences for students are also noteworthy. He pointed out that while some may worry about AI's supposed world-ending" potential, he thinks it will be more beneficial as an additive tool rather than a replacement for human capabilities.

Ben Affleck's interest in AI has been a surprising revelation for some, but it seems he's not alone in his enthusiasm. A 19-year-old founder recently secured $11 million in funding for their company, Ghost, which specializes in creating personal AI computers that come with a hefty price tag of $3,499.

These high-end computers are designed to enable individuals to explore the possibilities of artificial intelligence in a more accessible and user-friendly way.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/08/ben-affleck-is-an-ai-nerd-and-the-internet-is-impressed/

The 24-year-old, Anojan Sivarasa, was found guilty by an appellate court, which has sparked widespread concern back home in Sri Lanka. The case has triggered civil society petitions across the country, with multiple political parties and government bodies joining forces to seek clemency for the young man.

Rasamanickam Yogalakshmi, Anojan's mother, made a heart-wrenching plea through tears, urging Saudi authorities to show mercy towards her son. She begged them to forgive him and allow him to return home to his family.

The Sri Lankan government has been working behind the scenes to secure clemency for Anojan, but the family has received no updates on his condition since 28 September.

A social media dispute between Sri Lankan and Saudi Arabian users has escalated into a death sentence for one man, sparking international calls for clemency.

The incident began in June when footage of a Muslim man kicking a dog during a Hindu pilgrimage in Sri Lanka went viral on social media. The video sparked heated online debates, with some users posting inflammatory comments that targeted different religious groups.

In the heat of the argument, Anojan made a comment insulting the Prophet Muhammad, which was promptly deleted and followed by an apology video. However, screenshots of his initial post were captured and brought to the attention of his Saudi employer and government officials.

Anojan's devices were seized, and his social media accounts were removed at the behest of Saudi authorities, highlighting the ease with which online interactions can have real-world consequences.

The case against Anojan has taken a turn for the worse, as Saudi prosecutors successfully appealed to have him tried under Sharia law instead of cybercrime legislation. This decision was made by the appellate court on 17 September, and it resulted in an increase in his sentence from five years in prison and a fine of 3m Saudi riyals (approximately $0.8m or £0.6m) to the death penalty.

The Sri Lankan government is working diligently to assist Anojan, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirming that it is taking all necessary steps to aid him. The family of the accused has been meeting with high-ranking officials in an effort to secure his release.

The case has garnered significant support from various religious leaders, who have come together to call for urgent state intervention on behalf of Anojan. Senior Buddhist leaders and Hindu religious leaders have submitted a memorandum to the Presidential Secretariat, urging the government to spare no effort in obtaining a general pardon for him.

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has personally assured Anojan's family that the government will engage diplomatic channels with Saudi authorities to secure his release. He has instructed officials to work tirelessly on behalf of the accused, and the Presidential Secretariat is now handling the matter.

A Sri Lankan legal delegation is traveling to Saudi Arabia this week to meet Anojan's local defense lawyers and discuss the case. The four-member team will meet with representatives from two law firms handling Anojan's case.

The delegation plans to work out a strategy for moving forward in the case, according to Upul Kumarapperuma, President's Counsel and a member of the team. They aim to gather more information about the situation on the ground and explore possible avenues for support or intervention.

Meanwhile, communication between Anojan and his family has been severed. His sister Hamsidan expressed concern that her brother had not contacted them in two days, prompting them to reach out to the embassy for assistance.

The embassy assured them that they would look into the matter and provide an update, but so far no response has been received.

The controversy surrounding Mohammad bin Nasser al-Ghamdi's death sentence has sparked widespread criticism from human rights groups. His case highlights the country's strict social media laws and their potential consequences for individuals who express dissenting opinions online.

Al Ghamdi's initial ruling was later overturned, with him instead receiving a 30-year prison sentence, according to ALQST for human rights. This development is seen as a mixed outcome by many, given that he still faces significant time behind bars despite the reduction in his punishment.

The Saudi legal system has been criticized for its treatment of low-wage migrant workers, who make up over 10 million foreign nationals within the country's borders according to the International Organisation for Migration.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq14d438vx24o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The Oasis singer appears to be in a relaxed state, surrounded by cigarettes and alcohol, but his demeanor took a drastic turn when the club was found guilty of serious charges. Gallagher responded to rival fans calling for City to lose their trophies by labeling them "NEUROTIC little GIMPS".

His comments reflect a wider trend on social media, where Manchester City supporters have been fiercely defending their team's honor despite the scandal. The tone has been characterized by swear words and punchy one-liners, with many fans clinging to the hope that the club will somehow escape punishment.

On Bluemoon, the largest online forum for City fans, the atmosphere has been equally defiant, albeit with a dash of dark humor. Users have been quick to deflect criticism, comparing their team's situation to historical events and catastrophes.

Some fans have even gone as far as suggesting that Manchester City is being unfairly targeted by the Premier League and other forces, framing the controversy as a battle for the heart and soul of football itself.

The online forum dedicated to Manchester City's defense against Premier League charges has grown exponentially since 2023, boasting an astonishing 192,000 posts.

Despite this fervor, fans have been largely unwilling to accept wrongdoing or criticize the club's owners, even in the face of overwhelming evidence presented by the independent commission report.

One reason for this reluctance may be attributed to the significant investment made by Abu Dhabi United Group in Manchester City and its surrounding infrastructure over the years. This influx of funds has not only transformed the city but also forged strong emotional bonds between fans and the club's owners.

According to Irish academic Colm Kearns, the United Arab Emirates' influence extends beyond financial support, with elements of the fanbase becoming aggressive defenders of their regime in a co-opted effort to protect its interests.

The analysis by Irish academic Colm Kearns and his colleagues revealed a concerning trend among City fans. They found that some supporters would not only ignore the ethical issues surrounding the Group's actions but also actively defend them against criticism.

This phenomenon is particularly striking given the club's ownership structure, which has leveraged tribal loyalty to influence fan behavior. The owners' ability to shape public opinion and silence critics raises questions about the boundaries between sports fandom and political allegiance.

Sports journalists have reportedly been intimidated by online abuse from City fans, leading some to self-censor their reporting. This development is concerning, as it suggests that fans are using social media platforms to harass those who dare to criticize the club's owners.

The proliferation of social media has created an environment where fans can engage with others who share similar interests and perspectives. However, this online bubble can also make supporters more insular and less inclined to consider alternative viewpoints.

The rise of sports fandom circles has led to a phenomenon where supporters worldwide mobilize and fiercely defend their athletes or teams. This trend, which originated in east Asia through popular culture and music, creates an environment where fans are intensely focused on their own group.

As a result, the space for lighthearted banter, common ground, and compromise is significantly reduced. Fans become increasingly entrenched in their views, making it challenging to engage with opposing perspectives. This insular behavior can be observed across various sports fandoms.

Kearns suggests that some City fans are prioritizing the club over the wider football community. A Reddit post exemplifies this mentality, stating that being a City fan takes precedence over being a football fan in general. However, it's difficult to determine the number of online posters who don't live in Manchester or regularly attend games.

The motivations behind such behavior are intriguing, particularly when considering the potential influence of external factors. If a far-right tech billionaire were to acquire a successful sports team, they might be drawn to the loyal fanbase, which could serve as a defense mechanism for their reputation.

Fan forums from other clubs reveal a mixed reaction to City's guilty verdict. While most supporters welcomed the outcome, some questioned whether the club would face adequate punishment due to its connections with Abu Dhabi and the British government.

The controversy surrounding Manchester City's alleged breaches of financial fair play regulations has left some fans feeling disillusioned and even betrayed by their team.

Some supporters have taken to online forums to express their frustration, claiming that the club's connections with Abu Dhabi and the British government have created a sense of unease and mistrust in the game. They feel that the rules are not being applied equally, and that every title and match is tainted by questions about the club's integrity.

The Guardian Sport: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/oct/05/how-do-sports-fans-end-up-as-aggressive-defenders-of-a-nation-states-regime

The AI-powered Shopping Assistant provides real-time guidance on various aspects of a product, including details, shipping information, sizing, availability, and completion of the purchase process. This assistance aims to streamline the shopping experience within the app, reducing friction for users seeking to make a purchase.

Users can now initiate purchases directly from their For You feed, TikTok's main algorithm-driven video feed, with just one click. This new checkout feature eliminates the need for users to navigate away from the app or visit external websites to complete transactions.

The introduction of these features has significant implications for TikTok's ability to capture a larger share of users' shopping journeys and associated transaction value. By integrating AI-powered shopping guidance within its platform, TikTok seeks to increase user engagement and conversion rates without requiring users to leave the app.

TikTok is expanding its e-commerce capabilities by integrating AI-powered shopping tools directly into its app. This move goes beyond the existing TikTok Shop marketplace, which has been the primary engine for the company's online sales ambitions.

The new features are being developed in partnership with various commerce platforms and payment providers, including Salesforce, Shopify, Shoplazza, and Stripe. These collaborations aim to enhance the shopping experience within the app, making it more seamless for users to make purchases.

TikTok's influence on consumer spending is growing rapidly. According to the company's recent Economic Impact Report, its platform has a significant impact on U.S. businesses, generating $81 billion in GDP. Additionally, 54 million Americans have reported making a purchase after watching a TikTok video.

The integration of shopping tools into the broader app is part of TikTok's strategy to increase user engagement and conversion rates without requiring users to leave the platform. This move is expected to boost sales for U.S. businesses, which are already seeing significant revenue from TikTok Shop.

TikTok Shop has been operational in the U.S. since September 2023 and is estimated to have generated $15.8 billion in U.S. sales by 2025, accounting for approximately 18% of all U.S. social commerce.

TikTok has introduced a new AI-powered shopping assistant, enabling users to browse products directly within the app without leaving the platform.

The feature is designed to simplify the shopping experience for users, allowing them to view product details and reviews before making a purchase. TikTok's AI assistant will also provide personalized recommendations based on users' interests and preferences.

The introduction of this feature marks another step in the social commerce space, where platforms are increasingly blurring the lines between content consumption and purchasing behavior. By integrating shopping capabilities directly into its app, TikTok is seeking to enhance user engagement and drive sales for its partners.

As a result, users can now seamlessly transition from browsing products to making a purchase without having to navigate away from the app, streamlining the overall shopping experience.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/05/tiktok-rolls-out-an-ai-shopping-assistant-and-one-click-checkout/

The talent agency has announced a significant expansion of its Creators roster, welcoming five new members who boast an impressive social media following across Instagram and TikTok. The signings include Saturday Night Live UK comedian Al Nash, who has gained millions of views on platforms like YouTube for his viral sketch comedy skits. Lifestyle creators Britney De Villiers and Daniella Stockley, known as DaniBabes, have also joined the roster, bringing their expertise in digital media to UTA.

Nash's sharp humor and relatable characters have endeared him to a massive audience, while the dynamic duo of De Villiers and Stockley has built a strong following for their lifestyle content. Also joining UTA are sports-centric creators Nimi Mehta and entrepreneurship-focused creators Grace Andrews and Tara Keeney. With nearly 5 million followers across Instagram and TikTok combined, this new group is expected to contribute significantly to the agency's growing portfolio.

As UTA looks to tap into the creator economy, Beth Hatchett, a seasoned agents with extensive experience in representing creators, notes that the business is "growing quickly due to the success of creators who are building fan bases and businesses that transcend platforms.

The roster of creators signed to UTA continues to grow, with several new additions announced recently. Stockley, known by her online moniker DaniBabes, is one such creator, who has gained a significant following for her candid takes on relationships, nightlife, and travel. Her content is not limited to social media, as she will also be featured in the upcoming Netflix reality show Outside.

Other new additions to UTA's roster include De Villiers, whose content focuses on fashion, beauty, motherhood, wellness, and travel. Mehta, a TV and sports broadcaster and public speaker, had viral success over the summer after leveraging her online presence to secure jobs at high-profile events such as the 2026 World Cup with brands like Adidas and ITV.

Keeney is also the founder of Look Who I Found, a media company focused on making entrepreneurship more accessible to everyone. This initiative aligns with Keeney's goal of empowering individuals to turn their passions into successful ventures.

The Creator practice at UTA's London office, established in 2023, represents a diverse range of talent including Jamie Lang and Sophie Haboo, as well as newer additions like DaniBabes and Al Nash from the cast of SNL UK".

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/snl-uk-cast-member-al-nash-danibabes-uta-creators-signing-1236720773/

Months of planning and preparation can be seen online by fans who have been following their favourite artists on social media. This includes knowing not just what songs will be performed but also the stage design and layout.

The same phenomenon is observed with film and TV series, where spoilers are typically guarded against with warnings to prevent plot reveals. However, major concerts seem to be exempt from this consideration.

When a highly anticipated tour kicks off, as was the case last week with Olivia Rodrigo's Unraveled tour in the US, it's not uncommon for fans to share their experiences and photos online.

Fans of other high-profile artists such as Harry Styles, Charli XCX, and Ariana Grande have also been sharing behind-the-scenes footage from their tours over the past few months.

The rise of social media has led to a proliferation of behind-the-scenes footage from concerts and tours, often spoiling the surprise for fans waiting for live performances.

For some enthusiasts, this can be a source of disappointment, as evidenced by a 20-year-old criminology student who managed to avoid spoilers for Harry Styles' tour until one slipped through the net before her show in London. The fan was particularly looking forward to the experience and wanted to take it all in without any preconceptions.

The element of surprise is an essential part of live music events, allowing fans to fully immerse themselves in the atmosphere and discover new aspects of a performance. This is especially true for those who have waited years to see their favorite artist live.

Not everyone shares this sentiment, however. Some fans, like 22-year-old Georgia McAdam, actually enjoy spoilers as they provide valuable insights into what to expect from an event. According to her, online videos are more like teasers that add to the excitement rather than detract from it.

McAdam's approach highlights the diversity of fan experiences and opinions when it comes to social media spoilers in the context of live music events. While some fans prioritize surprise, others view online content as a way to enhance their overall experience.

To combat spoilers, some artists have adapted their live performances by introducing small changes each night. This way, fans attending later dates can still experience something new and unexpected. Taylor Swift's Eras tour is a notable example, where she incorporates bespoke outfits and surprise songs into her setlist. Similarly, Sabrina Carpenter has been experimenting with unique positions during her song "Juno and altering the outro of Nonsense".

In addition to these tweaks, some artists are deliberately changing their setlists for each show. Jay-Z's current tour is a case in point, where he regularly updates his performance lineup. This approach not only keeps fans engaged but also maintains a sense of novelty around live events.

Music industry insiders argue that such creative adjustments can have an added benefit: keeping the artist relevant and in the public eye. By consistently offering something new, artists like Taylor Swift stay top-of-mind among fans and critics alike. And with social media platforms like TikTok sharing these performances far and wide, it's no wonder audiences are eager to see what changes each night will bring.

TikTok itself has provided some insight into the impact of surprise elements on fan engagement. Figures shared by the platform show a significant spike in posts using #CharliXCX since the singer launched her Music, Fashion, Film tour last month, an increase of over 40%. This suggests that fans are indeed drawn to live performances with unexpected twists.

In some cases, artists are taking more drastic measures to ensure their shows remain spoiler-free. Phoebe Bridgers is one such example, banning phones altogether from her concerts. Attendees are required to lock their devices in a special pouch upon entry, and anyone caught breaking the rules will be escorted out of the venue.

Attendees are required to lock their devices in a special pouch upon entry, and anyone caught breaking the rules will be escorted out of the venue.

McAdam believes that recording at gigs is an essential part of the experience for many fans, and therefore he wouldn't support a ban on phones.

However, Collins suggests that more spoiler warnings could be provided on videos, allowing fans to choose whether or not they want to know what's coming next.

Collins' proposal would give fans the option to remain surprised, but still have access to information about the set list and other aspects of the performance.

BBC News Entertainment: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq62j2l2lx4lo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The actress' career suffered significantly following her post under a video shared by immigration reform advocate Abraham Hamra. Her talent agency CAA, which she had worked with for years, was among those who distanced themselves from her.

In addition to losing her team, Blair also faced repercussions in other areas of her life. She lost brand deals and even missed out on payment for a supposed Super Bowl advertisement.

Blair's comment sparked widespread criticism, prompting the actress to apologize. However, she now believes that this wasn't enough to mitigate the damage caused by her actions.

The aftermath saw many people who had previously supported Blair abandon her. Brands she had worked with quickly severed ties, while some long-standing partnerships were put on hold.

Blair shared these details from a podium inside New York's Jewish Museum during an Anti-Defamation League reception.

The backlash from Blair's now-deleted comment on social media was swift and severe, prompting her to issue an apology.

She acknowledged in her statement that she had inadvertently conflated Muslims with radical Islamists, causing harm to many people who were not intended to be hurt.

Blair parted ways with her team by the end of the month following the controversy, a significant development in her professional life.

In her speech at the Anti-Defamation League reception, Blair briefly mentioned the incident and apologized for any offense caused.

She stated that she had posted the comment in February 2024, just months after October 7, and acknowledged that it was wrong to conflate Muslims with radical Islamists.

Blair also spoke about her experiences since being diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, highlighting the challenges she faced in rebuilding her career and advocacy work.

Despite these setbacks, Blair emphasized that she has been fortunate to have a supportive team and is now working again, although she acknowledged that the controversy left a lasting impact.

The aftermath of Blair's anti-Islam comment has left an indelible mark on her personal life.

She revealed that the trauma she experienced was not limited to herself but also affected her son, who is now a teenager and should be more concerned with being embarrassed by his mother than frightened for her well-being. Careers can recover from setbacks, but lost years of childhood are irretrievable.

Blair's comments touched on recent online controversies involving high-profile celebrities, including Ed Sheeran and Macklemore, who have faced backlash for their actions. She also referenced Javier Bardem's involvement in a petition to remove singer Pink as UNICEF ambassador due to her pro-Palestine stance.

The controversy surrounding Pink highlights the consequences of taking sides and speaking out against perceived injustices. A movie star used his platform to push for her removal from UNICEF, despite her efforts to raise money for children over the years. Blair emphasized that Pink's "crime was simply expressing her opinion on stage.

Her words served as a warning about the dangers of losing humanity in the face of online outrage. When individuals are reduced to mere targets, their humanity is overlooked and they become nothing more than objects of scorn.

Blair's team has undergone significant changes since her public controversy over an anti-Islam comment on Instagram. Her new film projects are now being handled by top professionals in their field. The law firm Berlandi Nussbuam & Reitzas is now managing her career, and she has also hired PR specialists Oren Segel and Jill Fritzo.

In a recent public appearance, Blair revealed that she is working on a documentary about antisemitism called Hineni, which translates to Here I am in Hebrew. The film aims to shed light on the complexities of geopolitics and its connection to antisemitism. By featuring people who disagree with her, she hopes to spark meaningful discussions rather than just preaching to the choir.

The documentary will take viewers to Israel, providing a firsthand look at why this land holds significant meaning for many people. Blair emphasized that she wants to reach those outside of her own community, hoping to educate and raise awareness about the issue. By doing so, she believes she can make a positive impact.

Blair's commitment to tackling antisemitism is evident in her words, as she made it clear that her goal is not to manage" or "explain this complex issue but rather to bring an end to it. She has taken a significant step by speaking out publicly about her own experiences and identity.

By sharing her story and working on a documentary that sheds light on antisemitism, Blair is using her platform to promote understanding and action, sending a powerful message that she will no longer be silenced: Antisemitism has to stop."

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/selma-blair-career-comment-instagram-islam-israel-hamas-1236721161/

The post from Big Tech Alert noted that Musk is no longer following Zilis on X, the platform where the breakup announcement was made. Zilis' relationship with Musk has been subject to public scrutiny due to her role as his partner and mother of their four children.

Zilis has also worked closely with Musk in a professional capacity, overseeing his entire AI portfolio" including Tesla, Neuralink, and OpenAI. This arrangement is not without controversy, particularly given Musk's high-profile lawsuit against Sam Altman over donations to OpenAI.

It appears that Elon Musk's views on his former partner Shivon Zilis differ from hers. In a courtroom testimony, he described her as his chief of staff, sparking amusement in the gallery. This disparity in perceptions highlights the complexities of their relationship.

Musk has been involved in high-profile public feuds with several women who have had children with him. Justine Musk, his first wife, wrote about her experiences before largely going quiet on the subject. Another partner, Ashley St. Clair, reportedly rejected a $40 million non-disclosure agreement from Musk, indicating she was not willing to remain silent.

Musk's biographer Walter Isaacson received a cryptic tweet from Grimes in 2023, asking him to pass along a message about unblocking her and allowing her to see their child. This exchange suggests the difficulties some of Musk's partners have faced in navigating their relationships with him. Jared Birchall, described as Musk's fixer, is said to oversee deals related to privacy for these women.

Elon Musk's personal life has been marred by controversy and secrecy in recent years. One aspect of this is his numerous children, a total of 14 known offspring that have come to light through various sources.

It appears that one of these children was born to Shivon Zilis, who at the time was a member of OpenAI's board. The birth occurred while she was still serving on the board, but it wasn't until much later that her coworkers learned about the parentage of the twins, which were kept secret for some time.

Court documents eventually revealed Musk as the father of the twins, and this information was made public in 2022 by Business Insider. Interestingly, at the time of these revelations, Musk was living with Zilis, sparking further speculation about their relationship.

Zilis's breakup post on social media has also raised eyebrows, with some interpreting it as an overly effusive tribute to her former partner, Elon Musk.

Zilis's social media posts have sparked further scrutiny, as they appear to be effusive tributes to her former partner. In one post, Zilis wrote about a memoir by Elon Musk's mother, Maye Musk, describing it as an inspiration for resilience.

The book, which details Maye Musk's own experiences with hardship, has been recommended by Zilis as a source of strength and guidance during difficult times. Her glowing endorsement suggests that the author, Maye Musk, has had a profound impact on her life.

The Verge: https://www.theverge.com/tech/1004177/elon-musk-unfollows-shivon-zilis