Local officials have confirmed that the attack also wounded at least 14 others, including an 11-year-old boy. Those injured were likely passengers who had gathered on the platform, waiting for their trains to depart.

The incident occurred when a passenger train headed for Zaporizhzhia was stopped at one of Dnipro's platforms. The drone strike caused significant damage, leaving a large hole in the platform and smashing windows on nearby trains.

Russian military action has repeatedly targeted Ukraine's railway network in recent times. However, Moscow denies deliberately targeting civilians, despite the mounting evidence to the contrary.

An elevated threat level had been announced for Dnipro ahead of Thursday's attack, but it appears that many people were still on the platform when the drone struck.

The attack on Dnipro's train station has sparked widespread condemnation of Russia's military actions in Ukraine. The strike resulted in significant loss of life, with at least 14 people killed and many more injured.

Regional leaders are urging stronger international sanctions against Russia to curb its aggressive behavior. A deal between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin earlier this month had eased some US sanctions on Moscow, allowing the importation of Russian diesel fuel. Critics argue that this agreement has emboldened Russia's actions in Ukraine.

In other parts of the country, a Russian missile attack on Chernihiv city left two 15-year-old girls dead and at least 25 others injured, including four children. Regional head Vyacheslav Chaus confirmed the devastating toll of the assault.

Regional leaders have declared a day of mourning for Friday to honor those who lost their lives in Dnipro and Chernihiv. The attacks highlight the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, where residents are struggling to access basic necessities like food, water, medicine, and electricity.

The fragile ceasefire in Oleshky city is being maintained into its third day, according to Ukraine's human rights ombudsman, Dmytro Lubinets. Meanwhile, Russia has condemned Ukrainian drone attacks on Moscow during the ongoing Russia-Africa Summit, where African leaders and government delegations from 48 countries are attending a two-day event.

The number of Ukrainian drones launched towards Moscow has been staggering, with 613 reported overnight, according to the mayor of Moscow.

Most of these drones were shot down before they could cause any damage, but the sheer scale of the attack highlights the ongoing tensions between Russia and Ukraine.

Russia's defense ministry maintains that its attacks on Ukraine's rail infrastructure are targeted at military equipment and personnel being transported, rather than civilians.

However, statistics suggest a different story: nearly 60% of the 521 locomotives hit since February 2022 have been damaged this year alone.

Attacks on railway facilities have surged in recent months, with over 1,700 incidents reported so far this year, compared to just 1,206 in 2025.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9p8gdlz1p2ko?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The fragile truce was initially brokered to facilitate food and medicine deliveries to Oleshky, a Russian-occupied Ukrainian city where thousands of residents are trapped without access to basic necessities like water, electricity, and sustenance. The city's isolation is compounded by the Dnipro river on one side and Russian forces on the other, making escape routes hazardous.

So far, reports indicate that the ceasefire has held firm since its inception early Tuesday morning, with no incidents of breach or violence recorded in the region. This respite comes as a welcome development for residents who have been struggling to survive amidst the ongoing conflict.

US First Lady Melania Trump, along with Pope Leo XIV, played a key role in brokering the ceasefire agreement, which has since been expanded to provide safe passage for humanitarian convoys into the affected areas. Confirmation of this expansion came from Ukraine's public ombudsman and Oleksandr Tolokonnikov, deputy head of Kherson.

Humanitarian aid is set to arrive in Oleshky soon, followed by planned evacuations on Friday for those who wish to leave. Approximately 1,700 to 2,000 residents remain trapped within the city, while thousands more are scattered across surrounding areas, with some resorting to cooking garden weeds as a desperate means of sustenance amidst extreme hunger.

The extension of the ceasefire across Ukraine's Kherson region is being observed by both sides, according to officials.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov expressed satisfaction that events were unfolding as planned, crediting US mediation and specifically mentioning representatives of Melania Trump for their efforts.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha believes a successful ceasefire could lay the groundwork for further progress in the peace process.

A senior figure within President Volodymyr Zelensky's parliamentary party stated that the truce will remain in place until 22:59 Ukrainian time on Sunday, November 1st.

The humanitarian efforts in Ukraine's Kherson region have taken a significant turn for the better as officials announce an expansion of the ceasefire area.

Pope Leo had previously made a heartfelt appeal to Russian President Vladimir Putin to allow aid and medical supplies into Oleshky, while urging Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to cooperate with Moscow on establishing a truce.

The White House had also weighed in on the situation, stating that Melania Trump had secured a ceasefire agreement. In an update on social media platform X, Mrs Trump revealed that the area covered by the truce has now expanded beyond Oleshky, within the Kherson region, to facilitate safe passage for humanitarian convoys.

Engineering teams from Russia's Dnepr group have been working to clear main access roads into villages of explosive and booby-trap devices. This effort is expected to pave the way for supplies to enter cities on Thursday, with evacuations planned for Friday providing residents with a safer route out.

Local volunteers report that about 500 people had expressed interest in leaving the region by Tuesday afternoon, although many details surrounding evacuation plans remain unclear. Temporary accommodations have been prepared in various locations, including within the Kherson region itself and across the Russian border in regions such as Rostov, Krasnodar, and Stavropol.

In the Russian-occupied city of Oleshky in Ukraine's Kherson region, residents are facing a daunting decision: stay or flee. According to local officials, many residents want to leave the city and head to Russia, but it is unclear how this will play out.

Communication with the city has been patchy due to disruptions in services, making it difficult for people to access information about their options. Those who have spoken out about the situation fear reprisals from Russian authorities, which may deter others from sharing their concerns.

Residents and relatives of those trapped in Oleshky have expressed concerns that Russia might not allow them to return to Ukraine, or that they could face repercussions if their phones or online activity is monitored for signs of Ukrainian support. This has created a sense of unease among those who are trying to make decisions about their future.

In an effort to provide guidance and caution against misinformation, Ukraine's military general staff has issued a statement urging people not to trust unverified reports about evacuation routes or humanitarian convoys.

A Ukrainian resident who fled Oleshky through minefields three weeks ago has recounted his experience and offered a suggestion for a safer evacuation route across the River Dnipro. Serhii's proposal involves crossing the river without entering Russian-occupied territory, citing mistrust of the Russian Federation as a reason.

The proposed route is complicated by the fact that bridges over the River Dnipro have been destroyed, while the riverbank itself is reportedly mined and hazardous to cross. This makes it difficult for people to escape from areas under Russian control into Ukrainian-controlled territory.

In contrast, Kherson city on the other side of the river appears to be relatively calm, with no reports of explosions or drone-related injuries since Tuesday morning at 01:00 GMT. Residents have been able to move freely in the area, and there are signs that life is slowly returning to normal.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6lye1w9p2l8o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The initiative was aimed at exploring future negotiations that could help bring an end to the war in Ukraine, according to statements from their offices. They clarified that this move did not represent a unified position on behalf of Europe as a whole. It's understood that the two Nordic leaders sought to engage directly with Putin on this issue.

Putin responded to the call by suggesting that confrontational policies pursued by the EU and Nato are prolonging the conflict, which began in 2022 when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. His comments reflect ongoing tensions between Western powers and Russia over its actions in the region.

Following their conversation with Putin, Stubb and Støre spoke separately with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who expressed gratitude for the "active support" they offered during their meeting last week in Oslo.

The Norwegian prime minister emphasized that the ongoing war has severe consequences for both people and infrastructure. The suffering it causes will persist for generations to come. This stark assessment underscores the gravity of the situation in Ukraine.

Stubb described Tuesday's conversation with Putin as direct and substantial, stating that the outcome of the conflict will have a significant impact on European security. He highlighted that the war's consequences will affect not only Ukraine but also its neighboring countries. The Norwegian leader's comments reflect the growing concern among European nations about the war's far-reaching implications.

The phone call was part of ongoing efforts to find a resolution to the conflict. The talks were initiated by Stubb and Støre, who sought to build on discussions held in Oslo earlier this month. These meetings have led to a resumption of three-way negotiations between Ukraine, Russia, and the US after a months-long pause.

The upcoming trilateral talks scheduled for Abu Dhabi in November will be an important step towards finding a peaceful solution. The Norwegian prime minister's assessment of the war's long-term consequences serves as a reminder of the need for a lasting resolution to the conflict.

The phone call between the leaders of Norway and Finland and Vladimir Putin has sparked debate among European nations about the best approach to resolving the conflict in Ukraine.

In a significant development, Ukrainian President Zelensky discussed potential formats for engagement with European partners that could support diplomacy, defense, and shared security. This conversation comes after a rare occurrence: two European leaders have contacted Putin since French President Macron's conversation with him last July.

Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen expressed skepticism about the dialogue between Norway, Finland, and Moscow, stating it was uncoordinated with other European nations. Meanwhile, the Kremlin has hinted at welcoming an European negotiator to peace talks, a move that could potentially ease tensions.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6vgj813mlelo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Norway's prime minister hailed Tuesday's talks between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and US special envoy Steve Witkoff as "good and constructive. The meeting was part of a wider effort to broker peace, with European representatives also present. However, despite this optimism, the path to a lasting resolution remains uncertain.

The possibility of a trilateral summit between leaders from Ukraine, Russia, and the US has been floated in Oslo. This meeting would bring together President Zelensky, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and US President Donald Trump with the aim of agreeing an end to hostilities. However, this idea has yet to gain traction, particularly given Putin's reluctance to share a table with Zelensky.

The Kremlin has indicated that it may be willing to resume technical-level talks next month in Abu Dhabi, but only if these discussions are limited to lower-ranking officials. This development suggests that Russia is not yet ready to engage in meaningful negotiations with Ukraine and the US.

Russian officials have signaled that they are not yet ready to engage in meaningful negotiations over Ukraine, despite recent diplomatic efforts by the US.

Yuri Ushakov, a foreign policy aide to Vladimir Putin, was unimpressed by the discussions held at the St Petersburg talks, where he met with Steve Witkoff. According to Ushakov, Witkoff shared his views on new approaches from Europe and Kyiv, but these were deemed not useful in resolving the Ukraine crisis.

Ushakov's comments suggest that Russia is not feeling pressured to end the war, despite ongoing efforts by Western nations. He expressed skepticism about the prospects for peace, stating only that things are moving in a positive direction, without providing further clarity.

The Kremlin's stance appears to be buoyed by several factors, including Ukraine's strained air defenses and the approaching winter season, which may provide an opportunity for Russia to gain the upper hand. Additionally, US President Donald Trump's recent actions have been seen as a sign of a desire for improved relations with Moscow, including the easing of sanctions and the purchase of Russian diesel fuel.

The recent diplomatic efforts by the US government have been met with skepticism by many in Ukraine, who see them as a sign that Washington is willing to compromise on key issues related to the conflict.

Russian officials, however, appear to be welcoming these developments, which they believe will ease pressure on President Putin and allow him to maintain his current stance on the war-torn region.

Some analysts have pointed out that Russian MP Evgeny Popov's recent comments suggest a desire for improved relations with Moscow, particularly in light of US President Donald Trump's recent actions, including the easing of sanctions and the purchase of Russian diesel fuel.

These developments have led some to speculate about the possibility of a trilateral meeting between Putin, Zelensky, and Trump, which could potentially bring an end to the conflict, but this seems unlikely given the current state of negotiations.

In contrast, a meeting between Putin, Trump, and Xi Jinping is reportedly being planned for next month on the sidelines of the Apec summit in China, where some commentators have dubbed it The New Yalta" due to its potential implications for global politics.

This gathering would bring together the leaders of three of the world's most powerful nations, with Russian MP Evgeny Popov stating that such a meeting would be beneficial for the entire world.

Such an outcome would put Putin in a strong position, allowing him to take his place at the top table of global politics and potentially secure key concessions from the other two leaders.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm98zn5j89kdo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

A key aide to President Vladimir Putin made this statement after a meeting between the Russian leader's envoy and US special representative Steve Witkoff in St Petersburg. Yuri Ushakov expressed Russia's readiness to restart talks, which have been on hold since February, with the possibility of a new round taking place next month.

Ukraine has been pushing for an immediate resumption of negotiations, but Moscow had previously refused to engage in discussions while it believed itself to be making gains on the battlefield. Ukraine is currently facing severe shortages of interceptors as it struggles to counter Russia's missile attacks, which have caused significant damage and loss of life.

The US envoy, Steve Witkoff, met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky before traveling to St Petersburg for talks with Putin's representative. While the specific proposals brought by Witkoff remain unclear, Zelensky mentioned that discussions had centered around providing strong security guarantees for Ukraine and establishing an energy ceasefire.

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine began in February 2022 when Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukrainian territory. Since then, top officials from all three nations have held several rounds of talks aimed at finding a resolution to the war.

Russian officials have emphasized that any negotiations aimed at ending the conflict must focus on establishing a new security system for Russia and Ukraine once fighting ceases.

US officials have proposed a trilateral meeting between American, Russian, and Ukrainian representatives to facilitate technical discussions on a potential peace agreement. According to sources, this proposal was accepted by both Ukrainian and Russian delegations in separate meetings in Oslo and St Petersburg respectively.

Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov informed reporters that President Putin reiterated his assertion of strategic momentum for Russia's military efforts across the vast front line. However, Ukraine and its European allies have disputed this claim, pointing to a stalemate on the battlefield.

Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky has indicated a willingness to accept a deal that would freeze hostilities along the current front lines as a minimum requirement for Russia. He described such an arrangement as either a ceasefire or a halt in killings, and suggested that security guarantees for Ukraine could be explored after this initial agreement.

US negotiators have characterized the latest round of talks as "constructive, with one participant expressing optimism about the potential for lasting peace, security, and prosperity to emerge from ongoing discussions.

The diplomatic efforts to end the war between Ukraine and Russia continue amidst growing tensions between Kyiv and Washington. The recent round of talks between the two parties was marked by a heated exchange over issues such as intelligence sharing and military aid.

Ukraine has accused the US of withholding critical intelligence that would have allowed them to warn civilians about incoming Russian ballistic missile launches, resulting in significant loss of life. This claim has been strongly denied by US officials, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio calling it scandalous. However, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has stated that the sharing of intelligence is now functioning properly.

Another point of contention between Ukraine and the US is the use of drones in military operations. The Ukrainian military has complained about speed restrictions imposed by Elon Musk's satellite internet network Starlink, which has hindered their ability to conduct strikes against Russia. US officials have denied requesting such a slowdown, and a bipartisan group of senators has called for an investigation into this matter.

The tension between Ukraine and the US comes as President Trump continues to express his views on the conflict. He has stated that it is time for Ukraine to get a new president, implying that the current leadership is not effective in negotiating with Russia. This has sparked criticism from lawmakers who argue that such comments undermine the efforts of Ukrainian leaders.

The controversy surrounding the lifting of sanctions on Russia by President Trump has also raised concerns about the US's commitment to supporting Ukraine. The move allowed Russia to release large quantities of diesel fuel into the global market, fuelling rising fuel prices worldwide. This decision was seen as contradictory to earlier legislation authorizing fresh sanctions and tariffs on nations importing Russian oil and gas.

The release of American citizen Stephen Hubbard has sparked a mix of reactions from US officials, with some praising President Putin for his humanitarian gesture.

Hubbard, 74, was serving nearly seven years in jail for allegedly fighting on behalf of Ukraine when he was freed by Russia ahead of high-level talks between Trump's envoy and the Kremlin leader. The move appears to have smoothed the way for these diplomatic discussions.

US Vice-President JD Vance downplayed the significance of Witkoff's description of Putin as a humanitarian", emphasizing that his job is to secure results, regardless of personal opinions or sentiments towards those he negotiates with.

The release of Hubbard has been seen as a positive development in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, but it remains to be seen whether this goodwill will translate into tangible progress in negotiations to end the war.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq3djn5nxx12o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The charges against Hubbard alleged that he had served in a defense unit in Izyum, Ukraine, when he was captured by Russian forces shortly after Moscow's full-scale invasion in 2022. This release comes as President Vladimir Putin met US envoy Steve Witkoff in St Petersburg for talks on Wednesday morning.

President Donald Trump confirmed Hubbard's release on social media, stating that the former teacher was "on his way back home and that no prisoner swap had been necessary. The US president also claimed to have made a direct request to Putin last week for Hubbard's release, which led to this outcome.

Trump's statement comes as some observers might question the timing of Hubbard's release in relation to Trump's decision to suspend sanctions on Russia just two days before they were due to come into force.

The release of Stephen Hubbard by Russia has been met with praise from the US envoy to Moscow, who credited President Putin for showing humanitarianism in the decision.

Hubbard's health had reportedly deteriorated while in Russian custody, prompting concerns about his well-being and treatment. He is now expected to be flown back to Texas for medical attention, according to CBS News.

Witkoff's comments during the meeting with Putin highlighted the positive tone of their discussions, as he acknowledged the Russian leader's efforts to address the humanitarian situation in Ukraine.

The US envoy also used the opportunity to discuss ongoing peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, urging President Putin to consider renewing trilateral negotiations to bring an end to the conflict that has been raging for five years.

The Ukrainian government has accused Washington of halting intelligence sharing on Russian strikes, which allegedly led to losses in lives among Ukrainians. However, this claim was dismissed by US officials as scandalous. The restriction on the Starshield internet service during Ukraine's war effort was also seen as deliberate.

Following talks between US and Ukrainian officials in Oslo, it has been confirmed that intelligence sharing has resumed. According to a US official, these discussions were described as constructive", paving the way for renewed cooperation.

The resumption of intelligence sharing comes at a crucial time, with Ukraine's president emphasizing that the outcome of negotiations depends on whether the US can elicit new commitments from Russia regarding peace efforts. This message was conveyed through social media, highlighting the importance of meaningful dialogue in resolving the conflict.

Meanwhile, in St Petersburg, discussions between the US and Russian delegations touched on various topics, including the outcome of the Oslo talks. According to reports, documents outlining approaches to the peace process were presented by the US envoy. These exchanges also covered other issues such as economic cooperation with the US and a possible meeting in China.

The developments mark a positive turn in relations between the two nations, with large quantities of fertiliser reportedly set to be supplied from Russia to the American market under an agreement reached during the talks.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6m24l9v3745o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

In a statement outside the White House on Monday, Trump expressed his frustration with Zelenskyy's handling of the conflict, suggesting that he should have resolved the issue long ago. Trump claimed that if Zelenskyy had listened to him, he would have made a better deal by now.

The US president has been criticizing Zelenskyy for several days, with his verbal jabs at the Ukrainian leader escalating into a full-blown public feud between the two leaders. The rift between them deepened further on Sunday when Trump made another scathing comment about Zelenskyy's leadership.

Trump's comments have sparked concern that the US may be losing its influence in Ukraine as the conflict with Russia continues to drag on. His defense of sanctions waivers for Russia has also raised eyebrows, with some analysts questioning whether this move is aimed at keeping Moscow engaged in talks or merely coddling a key ally.

The Trump administration's decision to waive sanctions on Russia has sparked outrage in Ukraine, with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warning that it will embolden Russian aggression and hinder efforts to end the conflict.

Zelenskyy's concerns were echoed by US officials who argue that the move rewards Moscow for its continued involvement in Ukraine. The decision comes as tensions between Washington and Kyiv have been rising, with some analysts suggesting that Trump is prioritizing his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin over Ukraine's interests.

The waiver has also sparked controversy due to separate plans announced by Trump to allow Russia to export large quantities of diesel fuel to the US and global markets. This move aims to tackle soaring fuel prices following the conflict in Iran, but it has been criticized for undermining efforts to pressure Moscow into ending its involvement in Ukraine.

Zelenskyy expressed frustration with the administration's handling of military aid during a meeting with US senators on Monday, where he highlighted delays in arms shipments and restricted intelligence sharing. He also noted that several European countries are prepared to transfer Patriot interceptor missiles but are awaiting US approval.

Tensions between Ukraine and the US have escalated as President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed frustration over a lack of advance warning on Russian attacks from its partners. In a video posted on Telegram, he revealed that Ukraine had not received timely warnings on three separate occasions in the past week.

The dispute has also centered around Starlink services in Ukraine, with Zelenskyy accusing the US of deliberately disrupting them last week. However, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio rejected this claim, sparking further tension between the two nations.

As diplomacy efforts continue, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff is set to travel to Norway for negotiations on ending the war in Ukraine. The Oslo talks are expected to bring together key players including Zelenskyy and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store, as well as representatives from the E4, European Union, and NATO.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/20/us-ukraine-relations-sour-as-trump-zelenskyy-clash-over-talks-arms?traffic_source=rss

According to an exclusive report, one of these men, who has chosen to remain anonymous but will be referred to as Ivan, claims to have played a crucial role in Ukrainian drone attacks on strategic bombers and munitions factories inside Russia.

Ivan features in a BBC World Service documentary that delves into the shadowy world of Russian saboteurs. The documentary also sheds light on the activities of another individual, Foma, a Russian living in exile in Poland who has established a network of undercover volunteers within Russia.

Foma's operation is said to be focused on gathering intelligence on high-level military officers targeted by Ukraine's GUR (military intelligence service), and he stresses that his team does not directly participate in any attacks. However, Foma did confirm that they had provided the Ukrainians with information about Lt Gen Fanil Sarvarov, who was assassinated in Moscow in December last year.

While there have been previous reports of Russian sabotage groups, it is rare to gain access to someone like Ivan, who claims to be operating on the ground and providing alleged details about his activities. The GUR has confirmed that both Ivan and Foma are working for the agency, but acknowledges that it cannot fully verify their accounts.

Both the GUR and these individuals have been cautious in sharing information about their operations, making it difficult to confirm or deny the claims made by Ivan and Foma, leaving questions unanswered about the extent of such activities within Russia.

The tactics employed by Ivan and Foma have been acknowledged by Ukrainian authorities, who claim to be conducting co-ordinated drone attacks on legitimate targets inside Russia. These operations are part of a broader strategy that Kyiv has revealed in recent months. While Ukraine never officially admits or claims responsibility for targeted attacks, a Ukrainian intelligence officer has previously confirmed to the BBC that his country was behind the killing of Lt Gen Igor Kirillov in December 2024.

The use of secret agents by Ukraine is a significant component of its operations inside Russia. These individuals are tasked with gathering intelligence and carrying out missions on behalf of Kyiv. However, it remains difficult to confirm the exact number of Russians working for Ukraine in this capacity. Estimates vary widely, with Foma suggesting that there may be as many as 300-500 individuals involved.

The scope of Ukraine's operations inside Russia is not limited to drone attacks and targeted killings. According to Ivan, his work involved conducting surveillance on military sites and identifying potential locations to hide drone components. This preparation was intended to facilitate future attacks on Russian assets, which could have significant consequences for the country's military capabilities.

Ivan's comments on the impact of these operations are revealing, as he suggests that they are aimed at hastening the downfall of President Vladimir Putin's regime. He believes that Russia's war in Ukraine is closely tied to the stability of Putin's rule, and that a loss in Ukraine would be a significant blow to his authority.

The involvement of Russian citizens in Ukraine's operations raises questions about the extent to which these individuals are motivated by opposition to the war or to Putin's regime more broadly. While Ivan and Foma claim to be opposed to both, it is unclear how widespread this sentiment is among those working with Ukraine.

The activities of Ivan and Foma, as well as other Russians working on behalf of Ukraine, have significant implications for Russia's national security and the stability of Putin's rule. As these individuals continue to carry out their missions, attention will likely focus on the consequences of their actions for both Ukraine and Russia.

The tactics of Foma's operation are shrouded in secrecy, but one thing is clear: he has a keen understanding of Russia's military infrastructure. A video sent to his associate Mamon showed him apparently hiding explosives near a Russian airfield, highlighting the potential consequences of being caught.

Foma claims to have operated within the Russian elite before turning against them, and this experience has given him access to valuable insider information. He uses this knowledge to train his volunteers in Russia online, teaching them how to trail senior military officials marked for surveillance.

The training sessions are meticulous, with Foma providing detailed files on each target, including their personal details, vehicle information, and other relevant data. His instructions also emphasize the importance of discretion, warning his volunteers not to use phones while conducting surveillance.

Foma's network spans multiple countries, with approximately three dozen individuals split between Russia, Ukraine, and Europe. Those outside Russia provide logistical support, tracking targets' digital footprints and helping to identify vulnerabilities in the system.

To gain a deeper understanding of their targets, Foma's team uses advanced mapping techniques to visualize military infrastructure. This database, which he shared with Mamon on his laptop, highlights storage warehouses, military units, and even the residences of high-ranking officials.

By studying these maps, Foma believes they can identify weak points in Russia's military system, allowing them to aim for strategic targets that will have a significant impact. His methods may be unconventional, but Foma is convinced that this approach is necessary to bring about change from within.

Foma's team is meticulous in their research before deciding whether to collaborate with a target or not. They thoroughly verify the data on the individual before making a decision. This methodical approach allows them to assess the potential risks and benefits of working with someone.

According to Foma, his team's actions are justified by the desire to bring accountability to those who carry out violent acts in Ukraine on behalf of Putin and Russia. He wants these individuals to understand that they will be held responsible for their actions, and that they should fear consequences.

Foma emphasizes that his network only provides intelligence to the Ukrainians and does not engage in assassinations themselves. This approach allows them to maintain a level of deniability while still contributing to the efforts against Russian interests.

The team's focus on providing accurate information is evident in the way they gather and analyze data. Foma shared an example with Mamon, recounting the effort it took to track Gen Sarvarov before his assassination in December 2025. The general had a complex schedule, constantly changing his plans and covering his tracks.

When Ivan was questioned about his involvement in sabotage operations, he remained tight-lipped. However, further investigation by military intelligence contacts suggested that Ivan might have been involved in a plot to target Russia's largest military drone factory at Yelabuga in June last year.

Ivan stressed the importance of avoiding harm to civilians during operations, highlighting the risks faced by those involved in these activities. He shared a personal anecdote about being stopped for inspection while carrying handmade explosives, narrowly avoiding detection and potential serious consequences.

The operatives involved in sabotage work within Russia often operate independently of each other, without a clear structure or chain of command.

This is done as a precautionary measure to avoid detection by Russian authorities, who closely monitor individuals suspected of anti-Putin activities.

Foma, another individual involved in similar operations, has also implemented this approach with his team, believing that gathering people in groups would increase the risk of being caught.

According to Foma, even online communication can be a threat, and operatives are advised not to leave digital footprints or engage in group chats that could raise suspicions.

The scarcity of suitable individuals for such work is another challenge faced by those involved in sabotage operations within Russia.

The handler's admission raises questions about Ivan's true loyalty and whether he might be working for both sides. The possibility of duress or coercion is a concern, as it could compromise the entire operation.

Foma offers a nuanced perspective on Ivan's freedom to travel, suggesting that there are vulnerabilities in Russia's governance system that can be exploited by those who know where to look. He likens this situation to a mouse navigating through holes in a piece of cheese, highlighting the complexity of operating within Russia's borders.

Ivan had provided Marcin with advance warning about a major attack on strategic bombers at Russian airfields, but he never specified when or where it would occur. This information was shared over a year before the devastating strike by Ukrainian drones, which involved more than 100 aircraft.

The weight of fear is a constant companion for Ivan, who acknowledges its presence even in moments of inaction. Despite this burden, he remains hopeful that his circumstances will eventually change and that a better future awaits him outside of Russia's shadowy world.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6pwgzkj8zzgo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The diesel deal has added to the tensions between Washington and Kyiv, which have been strained in recent weeks due to reports of disruptions to Starlink/Starshield services. The service was suspended for two days, from October 13-14, before being restored. However, unconfirmed reports suggest that the restrictions may have been imposed by the White House as a pressure tactic on Ukraine.

The disruption of Starlink/Starshield services has further strained relations between Ukraine and the US, which have already been strained due to Trump's previous tilts towards Moscow. On Friday, Zelenskyy accused Washington of continuing to throttle Starlink and making concessions to Russia.

Trump's decision to prioritize a diesel deal with Putin over Ukraine is not unprecedented, as he has done so before at his August 2025 summit in Alaska. However, despite this history, the arrangement under which Europe pays for US weapons delivered to Ukraine continues to work, and the US still shares intelligence with Kyiv.

Despite earlier proposals to reconsider certain aspects of its peace framework, the White House has softened its stance on several key issues. Specifically, it has dropped plans to officially recognize Crimea as part of Russia and to require Ukraine to withdraw from all of its Donbas region.

Ukraine and Europe have continued to cooperate with US diplomatic efforts aimed at Moscow, led by envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. This cooperation includes going along with the diesel deal, despite potential opposition from Congress.

However, this cooperation should not lull Ukraine or its European backers into a false sense of security. There are many reasons for them to be concerned, beyond just Trump's unpredictable nature.

One major concern is Putin's determination to escalate the conflict in Ukraine. Cities and critical infrastructure are being targeted daily by ballistic missiles and upgraded drones, putting a strain on Ukraine's air defences. The country is also bracing for another harsh winter.

Russia has been portraying itself as the victim of Ukrainian aggression, after Kyiv resumed its attacks, including an attack on a refinery in Ryazan that Trump described as "a disgrace".

Fighting has escalated along NATO's eastern border as Ukrainian grain shipments through the Black Sea have come under attack in Romanian waters. This move by Russia appears to be part of a broader strategy to disrupt Ukraine's supply chain and gain leverage over key European countries. The attacks on grain ships are likely aimed at crippling Ukraine's economy and eroding its ability to resist Russian aggression.

Russia is also waging a hybrid war against Europe, seeking to intimidate and influence public opinion in crucial member states like Germany. By spreading fear through targeted attacks, Moscow aims to sway the balance of power within the EU. This tactic has already shown some success, with some European leaders beginning to re-evaluate their stance on Russia.

In response to these developments, some EU countries are pushing for renewed engagement with Moscow. Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico recently announced that his country's intergovernmental economic commission with Russia would resume work. Meanwhile, Bulgarian President Rumen Radev has expressed support for Trump's efforts to negotiate a diesel fuel deal with Moscow.

The financial burden of supporting Ukraine is becoming increasingly unsustainable for European countries. The 90-billion-euro loan authorized by the EU in April may run out before the end of 2027, leaving Kyiv facing an estimated shortfall of up to 70 billion euros for defense and civilian purposes that year. This has sparked a heated debate within the EU about how to finance Ukraine's needs.

The question of whether aid for Ukraine should come from Russia's frozen financial assets in Europe is once again being raised as a possible solution. Trump has called for some of these funds to be released, while others are advocating for deep cuts in EU spending to address the budget shortfall.

The looming elections in several European countries have added to the pressure on leaders to address the budget shortfall and make tough decisions about aid to Ukraine.

In a rare display of unity, European Council President Antonio Costa and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy were joined by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels last week. Costa emphasized that support for Ukraine must continue despite the challenges facing Europe, while Zelenskyy reminded everyone of the consequences if aid is withdrawn.

The EU has taken steps to bolster its relationship with Ukraine ahead of the summit, including opening two clusters in accession talks and imposing new sanctions on Russia. This move follows a meeting between Zelenskyy and British leaders in London earlier this week.

As it stands, the EU and UK have become the primary supporters of Ukraine's survival as an independent state. They have filled the void left by the US, which has been unable to provide consistent support. For Ukraine, becoming a member of the EU or a closely integrated partner like Norway remains its long-term goal.

The path ahead will be fraught with difficulty, particularly in light of the upcoming elections and the need for European leaders to balance competing priorities and make tough decisions about aid to Ukraine.

Europe's military capabilities are currently insufficient to fill the void left by the United States in Ukraine. The ongoing conflict has made it clear that European forces lack the necessary firepower and resources to effectively counter Russian aggression on their own.

The absence of a viable alternative to Starlink is another significant concern for Europe. While European intelligence agencies can provide some data support, they are unable to replicate the satellite-based communication system's capabilities in the short term.

As a result, European nations are investing heavily in developing their own air-defence systems and interceptors. However, these efforts are expected to take at least a decade to bear fruit, leaving Europe reliant on US support for the foreseeable future.

In negotiations with Russia, Europe lacks the leverage needed to bring Vladimir Putin to the table. While sanctions relief and restored energy flows could serve as incentives, any Russian response is likely to require pressure of some kind, something that has thus far eluded the United States under Trump's leadership.

Both Ukraine's President Zelenskyy and European leaders will likely adopt a cautious approach to dealing with Trump, attempting to maintain good relations with him while navigating their own differences. They may be counting on the current White House overture to Russia to lose momentum after the upcoming midterm elections.

They will probably advise Trump that his legacy would be best served by standing firm against Moscow, an opinion shared by many of his fellow Republicans. This wait-and-see strategy relies on weathering through the winter and, ultimately, the end of Trump's presidency.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/10/17/ukraine-and-europe-have-little-choice-but-to-work-with-trump?traffic_source=rss

The Ukrainian military is using advanced technology to outmaneuver their opponents, with commanders monitoring live streams of the battlefield from underground bunkers. These command centers are equipped with cutting-edge equipment and staffed by experienced personnel who can quickly respond to changing situations on the ground.

One such commander was seen calling in a drone strike to take down an incoming Russian aircraft, while simultaneously warning his troops below about the potential threat. This rapid response is made possible by the advanced technology at their disposal, which enables them to stay one step ahead of the enemy.

The Ukrainian military has been using this approach as part of Operation Vivaldi, a counter-offensive aimed at liberating territory in the eastern Donbas region. Recent months have seen significant gains for Ukraine, with an estimated 277 square kilometers of land reclaimed from Russian forces.

The operation's name reflects its four stages or "seasons, inspired by the famous violin concerto by Italian composer Antonio Vivaldi. This clever naming strategy is not just a creative touch - it also highlights the military's focus on adapting to changing circumstances and staying ahead of their opponents.

As the battle for control of Donbas continues, Ukraine has reported inflicting heavy losses on Russian forces, with estimates suggesting over 8,000 casualties in Vivaldi alone. While Russia has been engaged in a brutal campaign of aerial bombing, targeting Ukraine's energy infrastructure and civilian populations, it is the Ukrainian military that has been making significant gains on the ground.

The relentless drone attacks by Russia have continued to plague Ukrainian forces on the front line, with soldiers facing an average of 10 aerial threats per day.

In a harrowing display of modern warfare, Ukrainian snipers have been using specialized nets to capture enemy drones in mid-air, preventing them from carrying out devastating reconnaissance or explosive strikes. This tactic has proven effective, but it's just one layer of the complex battlefield strategy employed by Ukraine's military.

The command bunker plays a crucial role in coordinating these efforts, with live feeds from hovering cameras providing real-time intelligence on enemy movements and positions. Meanwhile, Ukrainian attack drones are deployed to target enemy spotter drones that would otherwise call in more firepower.

Starshield, the military version of Elon Musk's Starlink satellite communications network, is a key component of Ukraine's arsenal, enabling broadband connectivity across the battlefield and facilitating the operation of interceptor and mid-range strike drones.

The sudden imposition of restrictions on Starshield by an unnamed authority has sparked major concern among Ukrainian officials, with some speculating that the order may have originated from the White House.

The front line in Ukraine is a complex web of digital connectivity that allows soldiers to perform their duties effectively. From surveillance and communication to artillery fire, technology plays a vital role in the war effort.

After 95 days of pushing forward on the front line, weary Ukrainian soldiers have finally reached the command post, where they were met with an emotional reunion with their families. The long-awaited respite is a welcome relief for those who have been fighting tirelessly.

Ukrainian infantrymen, like Dealer, have had to adapt quickly to new situations and technologies. According to him, one of the most significant threats on the front line has been Russian drones, which are remotely piloted and pose a formidable challenge to Ukrainian forces.

Commanders have praised the thorough preparation that went into planning the offensive, with months of training and restructuring of tactics paying off in a major way. The use of advanced technologies such as robots and drones led the assault on Russian positions, resulting in significant gains for the Ukrainians.

The recaptured region bears testament to the devastating power of modern warfare, where entire villages lie in ruins, their residents either displaced or lost forever. The few remaining homes that stand are a poignant reminder of what has been lost, and the daunting task ahead for those seeking to rebuild.

Ukrainian soldiers are cautiously optimistic about their recent gains, which have halted Russia's advance and provided them with a strategic foothold. According to Andriy Hitt, chief of staff at Revenge Bridge, securing advantageous positions is crucial in this operation, allowing Ukraine to plan future successful manoeuvres and gain the upper hand in battle.

The use of advanced technologies has been instrumental in Ukraine's success, enabling them to exploit vulnerabilities in Russian defenses. However, the limitations imposed by US technology and intelligence could potentially undermine these gains, threatening to undo the hard-won progress made so far.

Tensions between Kyiv and Washington are running high, with President Zelensky expressing his feelings of betrayal towards Donald Trump. In a surprising move, Trump has publicly declared that he is not a fan of the Ukrainian leader, suggesting that he finds him more difficult to work with than Vladimir Putin.

Soldiers on the front line have expressed optimism about their country's chances of winning the war despite diplomatic tensions between Ukraine and the US.

The morale among troops has been boosted by a recent operation that has enabled them to receive essential supplies, including food parcels dropped off by drones. Volodymyr, affectionately known as Grandpa" by his comrades, is one soldier who has benefited from these deliveries.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvx284w16z1po?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The incident comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced that his government would resume attacks on Russian energy infrastructure, which had been temporarily halted at the request of the US. This decision was reportedly made in response to continued strikes on Ukrainian energy targets by Russia.

Zelensky claimed that the US had withdrawn its intelligence-sharing on Russian strikes, allegedly as a pressure tactic to persuade Ukraine to abandon its military campaign altogether. He also accused Washington of restricting access to Starlink satellite services used by Ukraine's military, stating this was an intentional move.

The Russian defense ministry confirmed that several missiles and drones were intercepted over Ryazan, resulting in a fire at the oil refinery. The incident is being seen as a significant escalation of tensions between Russia and Ukraine following the announcement by Zelensky to resume attacks on energy infrastructure.

As part of his previous agreement with US President Donald Trump, Zelensky had agreed to restrict Ukrainian strikes if Moscow also adhered to an "energy ceasefire. However, he accused Russia of ignoring this proposal after its announcement.

The sudden withdrawal of key US support elements has left Ukrainian officials feeling betrayed by Washington.

According to reports, Ukrainian leaders had been informed by their US counterparts that if they did not stop certain strikes, intelligence sharing would be blocked.

This move is particularly significant given Ukraine's reliance on US-provided early-warning alerts for incoming Russian aerial attacks. These alerts enable the country to mount effective air defences and limit successful strikes.

The restriction has also affected the use of Starlink internet links throughout Ukraine's war effort, which are used to guide drones and protect its skies.

Ukraine's Ministry of Defence is still working to clarify the reasons behind the unexpected restrictions on the military-focused version of Starlink.

Sources within the ministry confirmed that operation while on the move had been restored, but officials remain unsure about what caused the initial disruption.

The incident has sparked concerns among Ukrainian soldiers, with one drone reconnaissance unit member describing deliberate restrictions on the network as a betrayal".

A soldier known as Neo expressed his concerns on BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has brought international leaders together for an emergency summit in Brussels, where they are expected to discuss the escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's visit to London earlier this week was also marked by a significant development, as Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced that the UK would speed up delivery of lightweight multirole missiles to Kyiv. This move is seen as a demonstration of international support for Ukraine in its fight against Russia.

The Ukrainian president has made it clear that his country's military strategy will remain unchanged, with strikes on Russian oil infrastructure continuing unless certain conditions are met. Zelensky emphasized the importance of cutting off revenue streams to Russia's war machine and stated that this goal can only be achieved if the US supplies more Patriot air defence missiles.

Ukraine has been facing a shortage of these critical defences since the outbreak of the conflict, with stockpiles consumed by the demands of the Iran war. The situation highlights the complex web of international relationships and alliances that are being tested by the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

As European leaders gather for their summit, they will be grappling with the implications of Zelensky's comments on US-Ukrainian relations. In an interview, he suggested that his American counterpart has a tendency to align himself with autocratic leaders like Russia's Vladimir Putin, leaving some wondering about the future of this crucial alliance.

The relationship between the leaders of Russia and the US has been strained in recent times. The friction became apparent during a heated Oval Office meeting last year when one leader implied that his counterpart was hindering efforts to broker a peace deal.

This tension is still palpable as Ukraine's President walks a delicate diplomatic tightrope, showing willingness to engage with US-brokered deals while emphasizing the need for fair terms in any potential agreement. His stance has been consistent: he will only accept a peace deal that is just.

However, he recently expressed strong reservations about an agreement between Russia and the US, under which 300,000 tonnes of diesel fuel would be released into the global market. The Ukrainian President saw this as a tacit endorsement of Russia's war efforts by the US.

The agreement was part of an effort to address rising fuel prices in the US, particularly diesel, which have become a pressing concern ahead of midterm elections. This issue has taken on added significance given the sharp increase in petrol costs following months of conflict with Iran.

Local officials in Kirovohrad confirmed that at least three people had lost their lives as a result of Russia's latest assault on the central region, which has suffered its largest attack since the full-scale invasion began in 2022.

The devastating impact of the Russian strikes was also felt in other parts of Ukraine, with reports emerging of casualties in Donetsk, Kherson and Volyn. The sheer scale of the attacks is a stark reminder of the ongoing conflict, with dozens of cities and communities targeted by more than 850 drones launched over the past day alone.

The rising death toll has sparked concern about Russia's intentions, particularly given its decision to escalate attacks despite the easing of sanctions and international pressure on Ukraine.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqwyrnwd9dw1o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

According to Trump, both sides have agreed to halt their attacks on each other's energy facilities, which he attributed to his own intervention. However, this claim contradicts the assessment of Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who reported that at least six Ukrainian energy installations had been struck by Russian forces since Sunday.

Trump's comments came in response to questions from reporters on Monday and were made despite the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. When pressed about the Russian strikes, Trump acknowledged that there may have been violations of the ceasefire agreement on both sides.

The conflict began in February 2022 with Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which has led to significant loss of life and damage to infrastructure.

The announcement by former US President Donald Trump of a purported energy ceasefire in Ukraine has been met with skepticism from Kyiv and its European allies.

Critics argue that Trump's decision to temporarily ease US sanctions on Russian diesel was a misguided move that undermines years of effort to isolate Russia's economy and embolden Vladimir Putin. The move drew widespread outrage in Europe and Ukraine, where it is seen as a betrayal of the West's commitment to supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression.

In Washington, lawmakers from both major parties have expressed their discontent with Trump's decision, with some Republicans objecting that it undercuts a law signed by Trump himself to tighten restrictions on Moscow. The move has also raised questions about the US government's consistency in enforcing its own laws and policies.

Despite Zelenskyy's assertion that Ukraine is prepared to sign guarantees for an energy ceasefire, it appears increasingly unlikely that Russia will comply with such an agreement. In fact, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reported a significant escalation of Russian attacks on energy facilities in Ukraine, including six such incidents today alone, resulting in 33 wounded people across the country.

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been criticized by some for not being more receptive to a ceasefire in Ukraine's conflict with Russia. However, others argue that he is simply being cautious and not willing to give in to Russian demands without tangible progress on the ground.

Meanwhile, former US President Donald Trump has taken a different approach to the situation, suggesting that Ukraine itself is the main obstacle to peace. He claims that Russian President Vladimir Putin is more eager for a deal than Zelenskyy, and has even called on Ukrainians to vote their president out of office.

This stance is unusual given the strained relationship between Trump and Zelenskyy since Trump returned to the White House in 2025. It also contradicts previous statements made by Trump announcing agreements between Russia and Ukraine that ultimately failed to materialize.

The timing of Trump's latest announcement appears to be driven by his desire to bring down diesel prices before the US midterm elections on November 3, which he believes is crucial for protecting industries such as farming and ranching in the US.

Most polls suggest that Republicans may lose control of Congress due to growing voter frustration over rising prices, particularly for gasoline.

A recent opinion survey by the Associated Press and the University of Chicago found that 65 percent of US adults blame the White House for high living costs, with many citing Trump's tariff policies and his conflict with Iran as contributing factors.

As the energy ceasefire comes under scrutiny, Ukraine's European allies have expressed skepticism about its effectiveness.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/10/13/trump-insists-energy-ceasefire-holds-as-ukraine-reports-new-russian-strikes?traffic_source=rss

The attacks, which began in late September, also hit Ukraine's telecommunications infrastructure and temporarily disrupted internet and mobile phone service for around 100,000 households in the capital city Kyiv. This was part of a broader campaign involving long-range strikes on Ukraine's power grid, transportation hubs, and residential areas.

As Russia continues to pursue its "data center war strategy, some pro-Kremlin bloggers are sounding alarm bells about the potential consequences for Russia's digital economy. They warn that the country is not prepared to withstand retaliatory attacks from Ukraine, which has a more decentralized system in place.

These commentators point out that if Ukraine continues to disrupt Russia's centralized infrastructure through targeted strikes on its data centers and other key systems, it could lead to widespread disruptions of essential services for Russian citizens.

Ukraine's military has responded to Russia's cyberattacks by targeting key infrastructure, including data centers owned by Yandex, a Russian tech giant also known as Russia's Google.

The first Ukrainian drone strike hit a data center in the Sasovo region southeast of Moscow on October 8, affecting two supercomputers that house Yandex's AI model, YandexGPT. The facility is equipped with Nvidia A100 GPU chips and boasts significant computing power.

One of these supercomputers, Chervonenkis, has a performance rating of 29.42 petaflops and ranks at 101 on the Top 500 List, while its counterpart, Lyapunov, has a rating of 20.03 petaflops and ranks at 161.

A second data center in the Kaluga region southwest of Moscow was knocked out by Ukrainian drones on October 9, marking one of Russia's largest data centers with a maximum capacity of 63 megawatts.

Another Yandex facility in Vladimir, east of Moscow, was forced to suspend operations after being targeted by Ukrainian drones on October 11, according to BBC News. This site houses the third supercomputer, Galushkin, which has a computing performance rating of 20.64 petaflops and ranks at 134 on the Top 500 list.

The impact of Yandex's data center damage extends far beyond its own operations, causing disruptions to various essential services in Russia. Payment apps and digital banking services have reportedly experienced interruptions or outages, affecting users' ability to manage their finances online.

Additionally, popular e-commerce platforms and video streaming services have been affected by the data center damage, making it difficult for consumers to access these services. Ride-hailing and food delivery apps, as well as navigation and map services, are also experiencing disruptions, further exacerbating the issue.

Yandex's cloud computing service is another area that has been impacted, with several large Russian companies relying on this service for their operations. These companies include major grocery and fast-food chains, as well as a household appliance retailer, according to The Moscow Times.

The reliance of these companies on Yandex's cloud computing service highlights the extent to which Russia's digital ecosystem is intertwined with the company's infrastructure. This hyper-centralization has proven to be a significant weakness for Russia in times of conflict.

This centralized structure allows for a single point of vulnerability that can have far-reaching consequences, as seen in the case of Yandex's data center damage.

Russian companies are facing significant challenges in setting up backup infrastructure outside of Russia to ensure wartime resiliency. This is partly due to the Sovereign Internet Law" passed by the Russian parliament and signed into law by President Vladimir Putin in 2019.

The law has effectively restricted Russian companies from using foreign infrastructure, even in countries considered friendly. Meanwhile, sanctions imposed on "unfriendly" nations have blocked access to their IT resources. As a result, replicating Russian IT infrastructure in neighboring countries like Belarus or Kazakhstan is extremely difficult.

In contrast, Ukraine's digital ecosystem is more decentralized, comprising smaller data centers that are less vulnerable to targeted attacks. The country has also taken proactive steps to build backup infrastructure, including relocating some equipment and networks underground or outside the country.

To support Ukraine's efforts, Western tech giants like Microsoft and Amazon have provided free cloud services to help migrate critical government services to other parts of Europe. This has enabled many essential Ukrainian digital services to continue operating despite Russia's ongoing missile and drone attacks.

Amazon Web Services is hosting a significant amount of data from Ukrainian organizations, including over 60 government entities and the country's largest private energy company, DTEK.

Russian forces' cyberattacks on Ukraine's data centers have had an unintended consequence: a significant delay for Russia's own IT operations. According to an unnamed expert, Yandex may not be able to replace damaged equipment for up to six months.

A lengthy repair timeline is also evident in Amazon Web Services' experience after Iranian drone strikes knocked out multiple data centers in Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates earlier this year. This incident highlights the vulnerability of critical infrastructure in the digital age, where a single attack can have far-reaching consequences.

Ars Technica: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/10/russia-was-not-ready-for-the-data-center-war-it-started-with-ukraine/

The White House's stance is at odds with the situation on the ground in Ukraine. Despite Zelenskyy's five-year term expiring in 2024, a wartime extension has been granted by both Ukraine's constitution and martial law. This means that Zelenskyy will remain in office for the foreseeable future.

Ukrainians are divided over whether to hold new elections, with some calling for a change of leadership but others hesitant due to the ongoing four-and-a-half year war. A presidential vote is unlikely anytime soon, given the current circumstances.

In response to Trump's comments, Zelenskyy proposed holding an election if Russian President Vladimir Putin guaranteed a 60-day ceasefire. This would provide a temporary reprieve from hostilities and allow for a peaceful transfer of power.

Analysts believe that any elections held in the near future would likely pit Zelenskyy against one of his former military commanders, with some speculating that he could be a strong contender. Other potential candidates include old political heavyweights such as Viktor Poroshenko and Yulia Tymoshenko, but they may not stand a chance due to their past performances in elections.

Ukraine's former top general and current ambassador to the United Kingdom has gained significant popularity among Ukrainians since his resignation in 2024.

A recent poll conducted by the Rating Group found that nearly two-thirds of Ukrainians trust Valerii Zaluzhnyi, while only a quarter distrust him. This high level of trust is attributed to his military successes during Russia's invasion in 2022.

Zaluzhnyi played a crucial role in defending Kyiv and leading counteroffensives that reclaimed significant territory from Russian control. He was instrumental in returning approximately 40 percent of occupied land back to Ukraine.

Despite being fired in 2023, Zaluzhnyi remains an enigmatic figure when it comes to postwar matters such as economic restoration, demographic crisis, and Ukraine's bid to join the European Union.

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy remains a polarizing figure in his country despite facing corruption scandals within his inner circle.

A recent poll by Rating Group found that over half of Ukrainians, 53 percent, still trust him, although an equal number do not, indicating a deeply divided public opinion on the president's leadership.

Zelenskyy's ability to maintain popularity stems from his strong performance in previous elections. He won the presidency in 2019 with a landslide victory of 73 percent of the vote, setting a record for Ukraine's post-Soviet history.

However, Zelenskyy has also made some questionable appointments during his tenure, which may have damaged his reputation among Ukrainians.

The Ukrainian military's efforts against Russia have received a significant boost under the leadership of Defense Minister Fedorov. The ministry he leads has implemented various measures to increase transparency in procurement processes for essential supplies such as weaponry, food, and medical equipment.

This move has led to a crackdown on corruption schemes, making it more difficult for individuals to embezzle funds allocated for these purposes. As a result, the military's supply routes have been severely disrupted by drone attacks, with Russia's Black Sea Fleet forced to retreat from annexed Crimea to the Russian port of Novorossiysk.

Fedorov has also overseen an increase in the number of drones deployed against Russian targets, resulting in significant damage to arms and fuel depots, oil refineries, and air defense systems. Additionally, the number of ground robots used for supplying food and ammunition as well as rescuing wounded soldiers has been significantly boosted.

The reforms implemented by Fedorov have not been without controversy, however, with some officials reportedly pushing for his dismissal in July. Despite this, he remains a popular figure among Ukrainians, with his approval ratings soaring from 35 percent in June to 65 percent in July, according to recent polls.

Fedorov's success in simplifying bureaucratic procedures through the Diia smartphone app has also contributed to his growing popularity, as it allows users to access over 100 government services online. This initiative has been well-received by the public and has helped to increase transparency within the government.

Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been under scrutiny from US President Donald Trump, who has suggested that Ukraine needs a new leader.

A recent survey revealed that Zelenskyy's approval rating stands at 38 percent, with many Ukrainians expressing dissatisfaction with his performance. In August, he made headlines by advocating for a presidential vote in Ukraine, which was met with criticism from the public.

The list of potential candidates to replace Zelenskyy includes several notable figures, including Yevhenii Khmara, a general who serves as defence minister and is trusted by 29 percent of Ukrainians.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/12/trump-thinks-ukraine-needs-a-new-president-who-could-replace-zelenskyy?traffic_source=rss

Trump announced the deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin, stating that Russia would release 300,000 tonnes of diesel immediately to the American and global marketplace, followed by several more shipments in the coming months. This includes an additional 500,000 tonnes in November and one million tonnes after that, with a further three million tonnes expected to be delivered once its refineries are operational again.

Critics argue that this deal undermines US laws, which aim to restrict imports of Russian oil and gas due to ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine. The plan has been met with disapproval from some Republican and Democratic lawmakers who believe it puts American interests at risk. They claim the move is contradictory to recent legislation signed by Trump.

Russia's Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak confirmed the details of the deal, stating that the country aims to export a large volume of diesel in the coming months. He mentioned that the export could reach three million tonnes per month in future, with Russia seeking to capitalise on high demand for diesel globally. This move is likely to fuel further debate over US-Russia relations and energy policies.

Trump has stated his priority as lowering prices for Americans, particularly farmers, ranchers, and truckers who rely heavily on diesel fuel. He made this clear in a recent post on Truth Social, highlighting the importance of affordable fuel for these key sectors of the economy. However, critics remain unconvinced by the deal's merits, with concerns over its implications for US energy policy and security.

The opposition to President Trump's plan to import diesel from Russia is growing, with several lawmakers speaking out against the deal. A group of seven senators, comprising four Republicans and three Democrats, have called on Trump to reverse his decision, citing concerns that it violates US laws.

According to these lawmakers, Congress explicitly banned Russian energy imports in 2022 as a way to prevent American dollars from financing Russia's war against Ukraine. They argue that providing Putin with a financial lifeline would only serve to prolong the conflict and further destabilize the region.

The senators also pointed out that the US Treasury is suspending sanctions on Russian diesel exports until April 7, allowing for the importation of these products despite other assets remaining frozen. This selective lifting of sanctions has been criticized as a favoritism towards Russia's energy sector.

Critics argue that this deal undermines US energy policy and national security interests, particularly in light of ongoing tensions with Russia. The lawmakers who spoke out against the plan are urging Trump to reconsider his decision and prioritize American interests over short-term economic gains.

The opposition from these senators is just one example of the growing backlash against President Trump's plan to import diesel from Russia, which has sparked concerns about its implications for US energy policy and security.

The rising global fuel prices have had a significant impact on the US economy, particularly in the agricultural sector. The cost of diesel has become a major concern for farmers who rely heavily on it to operate machinery and transport their products to market.

The average price of diesel in the US is currently $6.28 per gallon, according to the American Automobile Association (AAA). This is down from the record high of $6.53 recorded at the end of September, but still a significant burden for farmers and consumers alike.

Analysts have raised questions about Russia's ability to meet the demand for diesel, should the US import it from there. They are also skeptical about whether this move will actually ease prices for American consumers in the long run.

The impact of the war with Iran on global fuel supplies has been severe, disrupting the flow of crude oil and driving up prices. This has become a major issue ahead of next month's midterms elections, which could determine the fate of President Trump's Republican Party in Congress.

Polls show that a majority of Americans disapprove of President Trump's handling of the economy and the war with Iran, which is likely to be a key factor in the upcoming elections.

The US relies heavily on diesel fuel, consuming approximately 3.6 million barrels every day. If Russia delivers its promised 300,000 tons this month, which is roughly half of the daily consumption, it would still leave a significant gap in meeting the country's needs.

International leaders are also voicing their disapproval of Trump's deal with Russia to import diesel fuel. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and UK Defence Secretary Wes Streeting have criticized the move, urging the US and its allies to step up pressure on Russia to end the war in Ukraine instead of pursuing energy cooperation with Moscow.

The development comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky welcomed a reported "energy ceasefire" between Russia and Ukraine announced by Trump over the weekend. However, there has been no response from Moscow yet, leaving the situation uncertain.

BBC News Business: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjn5v21py07vo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The announcement has been met with caution from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who initially expressed surprise before stating that Kyiv would support the agreement if Moscow does. However, he also accused Russia of targeting Ukrainian energy facilities after Trump's statement.

Trump has been pushing Ukraine to halt strikes on Russian oil infrastructure, which Kyiv says are crucial in reducing revenue for Moscow's war efforts. This move is linked to a recent deal between Russia and the US, where Moscow agreed to release diesel fuel to the global market in exchange for lifting sanctions on imports.

The diesel deal has sparked growing criticism from European officials and some US politicians, including those from Trump's own Republican party, who do not support it. Ukrainian President Zelensky went so far as to call the agreement a gift to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

This is part of Trump's efforts to lower domestic fuel prices ahead of the midterm elections, which have been affected by rising global fuel costs, particularly for diesel, due in part to the ongoing conflict with Iran.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed surprise at learning about a supposed energy truce between Ukraine and Russia, stating that it was news to him when asked by Axios.

In response to Trump's call for an energy ceasefire, Zelensky said his officials were eager to receive clear details on America's dialogue with Russia regarding the proposed truce. He emphasized that Ukraine is prepared not to strike at Russian energy facilities in exchange for similar readiness from Moscow and agreement from the US President.

Support for Trump's initiative has been voiced by several countries, including the UK, France, Canada, and the European Union. UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham echoed Trump's call, stating that Britain strongly supports a sustained energy ceasefire starting immediately.

However, Zelensky later revealed that Russia had continued to target Ukrainian energy infrastructure despite the supposed truce. A drone attack on a power plant in Kyiv resulted in power cuts, followed by strikes on facilities in the north-eastern Kharkiv region.

The exchange of attacks on energy installations has been ongoing between Ukraine and Russia for months. While Moscow claims it targets legitimate sites that support Ukrainian military operations, Zelensky views these actions as part of a broader effort to reduce Russia's ability to finance the war by disrupting its energy supply chains.

The attacks on Russian energy infrastructure have had a ripple effect, disrupting energy supplies on both sides of the conflict. The impact is being felt as Ukraine struggles to maintain its power grid and Russia faces challenges in meeting its own domestic energy needs.

Criticism of Trump's deal has been coming from all corners, including politicians in the UK and Europe. On Sunday, UK Defence Secretary Wes Streeting spoke out against it, echoing the sentiments expressed by EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas on Saturday. Both officials have questioned the wisdom of providing relief to Russia's energy sector.

The US Congress is also weighing in on the issue, with a group of seven senators publishing a statement that criticizes Trump's deal. They argue that it runs counter to existing legislation that bans Russian energy imports until Ukraine ends its aggression and ceases threats against NATO allies. The senators are urging the administration to reverse course.

Republican Senator Thom Tillis has gone further, warning that the deal will put American lives at risk. His comments come as Trump continues to trade barbs with Ukrainian President Zelensky over the diesel deal.

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has led to renewed tensions between the country's president and US leaders.

Regional officials have confirmed that six people were killed in separate attacks on two Ukrainian cities over the weekend, highlighting the ongoing violence. In addition, one person was reportedly killed in Russia's Belgorod region, which shares a border with Ukraine, while another fatality occurred in the Russian-occupied Donetsk region following a drone strike.

The escalating violence comes as US President Trump continues to exchange barbs with Ukrainian President Zelensky over a contentious diesel deal. Despite this, Zelensky's office has welcomed Trump's earlier claim of an energy ceasefire", suggesting that some level of cooperation may be possible between the two leaders.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6pvg4jyz1m0o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The assault targeted residential buildings in the south-eastern city, with eyewitness accounts suggesting widespread destruction. Among those confirmed dead are three children, while at least 16 others were hurt in the attack, which occurred on Saturday morning.

As rescue efforts continue, officials warn that several people remain trapped under debris and are still missing. Acting Mayor Regina Kharchenko described the scene as "catastrophic, with entire floors of an apartment block collapsing after being hit by a glide bomb.

Rescue teams from Ukraine's emergency services are working tirelessly to locate any survivors, with more than 80 workers involved in search operations that are expected to continue throughout the day.

The strike on Zaporizhzhia has sparked outrage and grief among Ukrainians, who are struggling to come to terms with the latest loss of life in the ongoing conflict.

President Volodymyr Zelensky has condemned Russia's actions, accusing them of targeting ordinary life" by attacking Ukraine's data centres. This move is seen as a deliberate attempt to disrupt the country's infrastructure and way of life, rather than focusing on military targets.

Zelensky has also criticized recent developments in the international arena, specifically US President Donald Trump's announcement of a diesel deal with Russia. He views this agreement as a gift to Russian President Vladimir Putin, which will only serve to prolong the war in Ukraine. According to Zelensky, Russia interprets any easing of pressure as a signal that it can continue its military campaign.

Both sides have intensified their attacks on each other's infrastructure in recent months, with Zaporizhzhia being a frequent target due to its strategic location and sizeable population. With over 700,000 residents, the city is a major regional centre located just a short distance from the front line, making it vulnerable to Russian drone and missile strikes.

The recent surge in Russian attacks on Ukrainian cities has resulted in a significant increase in civilian casualties.

On Thursday, a devastating glide bomb attack on two buses in Kramatorsk left at least 33 people dead, adding to the mounting toll of lives lost in the conflict. The city, with its population of over 700,000 residents, is particularly vulnerable due to its proximity to the front line, making it susceptible to Russian drone and missile strikes.

The escalating attacks have disrupted daily life for Ukraine's citizens, causing fear and uncertainty among the population.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwvgdpv642g5o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

At a speech in Moscow on Thursday, Putin dismissed suggestions from Kyiv and its international backers to halt the attacks on Russian oil refineries and other energy facilities. He claimed such proposals were "ridiculous and stated that Russia would continue to respond in kind to the Ukrainian strikes.

The comments came after a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in New York, where Zelenskyy signaled Kyiv's willingness to cease attacks on Russian oil refineries if Moscow agreed to stop its own aerial assaults on Ukraine's energy infrastructure.

Putin implied that Ukraine had achieved some success with the strikes, citing losses of 1 percent of Russia's gross domestic product (GDP) due to damage inflicted on its oil refineries.

Russian forces have intensified their long-range strikes against Ukraine's steel industry and supply chains, including rail infrastructure, in recent days.

The attacks have put pressure on Kyiv, which is bracing for another harsh winter as it continues to deal with the impact of Moscow's campaign. Ukrainian officials have accused Russian forces of deliberately targeting civilian areas, leaving the city on high alert.

A school in Kyiv was hit by a Russian drone on Thursday, according to city authorities, but fortunately no casualties were reported as children and staff had taken shelter before the attack occurred.

Russia has warned the West against escalating tensions over Ukraine, particularly regarding the threat of military action against the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad.

Russia has been sending warning signals to the West regarding its military intentions in Ukraine, particularly concerning the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad. According to NATO, Russia recently sent a diplomatic note stating that it would be prepared to use nuclear weapons if the Western alliance attempted to isolate Kaliningrad.

Putin's remarks came after a speech in Moscow, where he emphasized the dangers of escalating international conflicts. He cautioned that such escalations can quickly lead to catastrophic consequences, citing the possibility of reaching a fatal point of no return" due to an endless cycle of harsh retaliatory measures.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/1/russias-putin-rules-out-ceasefire-with-ukraine-during-speech-in-moscow?traffic_source=rss