Patel's departure from Meta follows other high-profile exits, including Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan and Head of Product for AI-for-Work Emily Dalton Smith. The move is likely to be seen as a significant loss for the company, given Patel's experience in developing AI technology.

Ndoc aims to revolutionize the way people work by providing a unified workspace that integrates multiple tools and applications. Unlike other AI solutions that layer on top of existing workflows, Ndoc seeks to replace traditional productivity software with a more streamlined and efficient approach.

The startup offers three main components: the Stage tab for presentations and key findings, the Narrative tab for analyses and generated content, and the Model tab for underlying datasets and Python scripts. This design reflects Patel's background in reinforcement learning and his focus on ensuring AI output is trustworthy.

As part of Ndoc, users can access the Python scripts used to create documents, allowing them to verify the accuracy and reliability of the information presented. This feature is likely to appeal to companies that require high levels of transparency and accountability from their data and analysis tools.

The AI-powered analysis tool, Ndoc, allows users to upload datasets and receive detailed explanations of their findings in a narrative format. This feature is designed to provide transparency and accountability by allowing users to verify the accuracy of the data and results.

Users can also add context to their documents, including information about the intended audience, tone, and memory settings that allow Ndoc to maintain a record of changes made to the document over time. This ability to track changes and updates is seen as a key benefit of using Ndoc.

Ndoc's architecture is unique in that it was built from scratch using open-source models, which allows for cost savings compared to other alternatives that rely on frontier AI models. This approach also gives developers greater flexibility in terms of customizing the platform to meet their specific needs.

The tool's creator, Rohit Patel, has stated that his early users were more interested in seeing all their data and analysis in one place than in the technical details behind Ndoc's architecture. This suggests that the platform's ability to provide a comprehensive view of complex data sets is its most compelling feature.

Patel's long-term vision for Ndoc involves reimagining the file format itself, with documents exportable as a single ".ndoc.html file that can be opened in any browser. He plans to open-source this format to allow other developers to build applications that work seamlessly with Ndoc without being locked into its proprietary ecosystem.

Patel's decision to leave Meta was motivated by his desire to open-source his project without being hindered by the input of hundreds of people and opinions on its format.

By going it alone, Patel aims to move quickly and capitalize on the pace at which AI can process information, rather than being limited by human constraints.

The founder acknowledges that entering the enterprise AI market is a daunting task, especially with established players like OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, SpaceXAI, and Google already vying for dominance.

These companies have developed tools that enable users to connect their AI models directly to workplace apps such as Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, raising concerns about Patel's own venture being overshadowed by the likes of OpenAI's newly launched Space.

The approach taken by AI labs to integrate their models into existing workflows has been driven by a desire to minimize disruption and maximize adoption. By allowing users to connect their AI models directly to workplace apps like Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, these companies have made it easier for people to incorporate AI into their daily work.

Patel's own experience with building connectors that enable customers to import data from existing tools reflects his understanding of the importance of seamless integration. He has stated that he wouldn't release a tool unless he loved using it himself, and has even spoken about having a graveyard" of underperforming products in the past.

The same principle is at play when it comes to gaining customer traction before seeking funding. Patel has expressed his desire to have proof of customer love for his product before taking on investors, suggesting that he values user satisfaction above all else.

As Ndoc continues its development journey, the company is currently conducting an enterprise pilot and opening up access to a limited number of customers who have signed up for the wait list. This alpha version is free to join, but users will be charged for usage and tokens once they start working with the platform.

The plan is to release a beta version in the coming weeks, after which Ndoc will officially launch next year. For Patel, speed is more important than perfection, suggesting that he's willing to iterate and improve his product as it gains traction with customers.

The approach Patel has taken to product development is one of speed and iteration, rather than perfection.

He emphasizes the importance of execution over perfect planning, suggesting that it's better to start making progress on a plan and then refine it as needed.

This mindset allows for rapid testing and adaptation, which can be crucial in a competitive market where companies are constantly innovating.

By focusing on getting something out the door quickly, Patel is able to gather feedback from customers and make improvements over time.

In doing so, he's able to prioritize the most important aspects of his product and address any issues that arise during its development.

As Rohit Patel transitions out of his role at Meta AI, he's taking on new challenges that involve competing products. Specifically, he'll be working on Microsoft Office and Google Workspace, two major productivity suites.

His departure from Meta AI marks a significant change for the company, which has been investing heavily in its AI research and development division. Patel's expertise in this area will undoubtedly be valuable assets to his new employers.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/27/meta-ai-director-rohit-patel-leaves-to-take-on-microsoft-office-and-google-workspace/

The trend towards these assistants seems to be gaining momentum, with several companies investing heavily in this technology. Instinct and Meta's Muse are notable examples, with Meta throwing significant marketing weight behind its product.

OpenAI's entry into this market is led by Alexander Embiricos, who heads the company's enterprise product team. At TechCrunch Disrupt this month, Embiricos shared insights on where OpenAI's assistant came from - a question that arises when examining why companies are opting for cute mascots as avatars.

The use of these mascots may be more than just marketing gimmickry; it appears to reflect an underlying design philosophy. Embiricos observed that "there's kind of this convergent evolution happening" in AI assistant development, with a focus on presenting the technology as a single entity and conversation.

OpenAI's assistant, called dots, is available within ChatGPT desktop and mobile apps for subscribers on the Pro tier or higher - plans start at $100 per month. Once connected to various tools like calendars, emails, and computers, dots aims to streamline work processes.

Embiricos noted that a significant portion of dots' capabilities could be replicated using OpenAI's Codex app, released earlier this year as a coding tool. However, achieving the same results through Codex requires more effort and guidance from users.

To make the technology feel intuitive and useful to users, OpenAI's product team focuses on how to present its functionality in a more accessible way.

The company has been working on this approach for some time now, as it spun out ChatGPT Work from its agentic coding tools originally built for software engineers. This move was intended to make the technology feel like something that could eventually become ubiquitous and an integral part of daily life.

The name "dot is a play on the negative space inside OpenAI's logo, conveying a sense of something that can be easily integrated into one's routine. However, it appears that not everyone involved in AI development was aware of the name's significance at first.

For instance, when asked about rival entrepreneur Elon Musk owning the dot.com URL, an OpenAI representative revealed that they found out about this fact quite late. This highlights the complexity and interconnectedness of the tech industry.

The concept of a persistent agent is central to OpenAI's approach, as it enables the assistant to think ahead and proactively offer help without needing explicit prompts from users. This results in more token usage for the company but provides users with a more anticipatory assistant that thinks about their needs and how to assist them.

In our testing, the assistant demonstrated its ability to think ahead by flagging calendar conflicts and upcoming deadlines, although it sometimes failed to do so in a timely manner, highlighting areas where improvement is still needed.

The personal assistant, codenamed dots, aims to provide proactive support by anticipating users' needs and offering suggestions before they're asked for.

Embiricos highlights a scenario where an engineer at a drone delivery startup encountered an outage, but the dots assistant had already detected the issue and provided valuable insights on how to resolve it. This proactive approach is crucial to the product's success.

One of the key concerns surrounding AI-powered assistants like Muse is data collection and usage. Critics have raised questions about the profiles built by the software, which can be used for targeted advertising but also raise privacy concerns.

In response to these concerns, Embiricos confirms that dots does collect some personal data, including information about users' family and friends, to inform its suggestions. However, this data is used primarily to enhance the user experience rather than drive commercial interests.

The assistant's proactive research feature enables it to analyze user data and propose ways to be more helpful. This involves regularly reviewing what the user has shared with the software and using that information to identify potential areas where assistance could be provided.

OpenAI's coding tools have evolved into an always-on personal assistant, but concerns about data collection and user control are still valid.

The lines between an AI agent's data needs and those of its parent corporation can be blurry. Some startups, like Hark, explicitly state that they don't collect data to fuel an advertising business, unlike companies like OpenAI and Meta.

OpenAI's dots app offers users the same level of privacy controls as ChatGPT, allowing them to turn off model training and control resource access. However, these controls are not granular, and the app can be pushy in its requests.

Users have expressed frustration with the lack of fine-tuned control over their data, leading OpenAI's Embiricos to acknowledge that more granular controls are needed. He points to the model's intelligence and discretion as a key factor in mitigating these concerns.

The issue of granular controls is not new; OpenAI faced criticism when it launched dots with conservative defaults and frequent permission requests. However, Embiricos believes this feedback can be addressed through tuning over time.

As AI agents become more widespread, questions arise about their scalability and usability in a business setting. While they may be fun for individuals, companies often prefer to deal with human assistants rather than AI agents.

To integrate AI assistants into everyday life, OpenAI is exploring ways to connect its agents with existing infrastructure such as payment networks.

In a bid to make this possible, the company is engaging in close collaborations with various stakeholders, including payment processors.

While these partnerships could pave the way for consumers to use their AI assistants to make purchases online, it's unclear what implications this might have on consumer finances and digital security.

Giving an AI agent access to sensitive financial information would require significant trust from users, who may be hesitant to share such details with a machine.

OpenAI is also considering how its agents can interact with other systems, including email inboxes, without overwhelming or compromising those networks.

OpenAI's coding tools have evolved into an always-on personal assistant, dubbed dots", which can perform tasks and answer questions in real-time.

Dots are available to all users, not just those with high-end plans, and the company is exploring ways for these agents to interact with other systems, such as email inboxes, without overwhelming or compromising them. This integration would allow Dots to provide a seamless experience across different platforms and applications. As a result, users will have a more streamlined and efficient way of managing their tasks and communications.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/26/how-openai-turned-its-coding-tools-into-dots-an-always-on-personal-assistant/

Lula's stance on US interference in Brazilian affairs resonated with voters and proved to be an effective campaign tool. His election was not won solely on foreign policy issues, but his defiance against external influence struck a chord with the public. As a former union leader, Lula has built a reputation for standing up to powerful figures.

Lula's rhetoric has apparently earned him some respect from US President Donald Trump. In response to the election result, Trump stated that he "likes" Lula and that they "get along well. However, Trump also claimed not to have taken sides in the election, despite his close ties with Jair Bolsonaro's family.

Trump's relationship with Lula is complicated, as evidenced by his past actions. When Brazil imposed tariffs on US goods in response to Trump's punitive measures, Trump called it a bad move. The two leaders have also had significant differences on issues such as the coup trial of Jair Bolsonaro, which Trump condemned as a witch-hunt.

The election result has likely been watched closely by both Lula and Trump, given their complicated history. When I spoke to Lula about a year ago, he emphasized that he had no relationship with Trump and did not intend to reach out to him. The current situation suggests a degree of pragmatism on the part of both leaders, who may be willing to put aside past differences in pursuit of common interests.

Lula's resounding victory in Brazil has sent shockwaves through the region, forcing Trump to reassess his ambitions for Latin America.

The Brazilian leader's strong stance on sovereignty and his criticism of US interference in the judicial process resonated with many Brazilians, who were eager to see their country assert its independence from foreign influence.

Lula's fiery speeches and public displays, including his signature blue cap emblazoned with Brazil belongs to Brazilians, became a rallying cry for those opposed to US meddling.

The agricultural lobby, typically a strong supporter of Bolsonaro, was also caught off guard by Lula's argument that the tariffs imposed on Brazilian goods were unpatriotic and detrimental to the country's economy.

As a result, even some in the agricultural sector began to question their loyalty to Bolsonaro, who had lobbied for the tariffs in the first place.

The election of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva as Brazil's president has sent shockwaves through the region and raised questions about US ambitions for Latin America.

Brazil is a crucial player in regional politics, given its sizeable economy and significant natural resources. The country holds the world's second-largest reserves of rare earth minerals after China, making it an attractive partner for trade agreements.

The US had been seeking preferential access to these valuable resources as part of its broader strategy to strengthen ties with key Latin American nations. However, this approach has now been put on hold following Lula's election.

Lula's administration is likely to pursue a more independent foreign policy, one that prioritizes Brazil's interests and sovereignty over close ties with the US. This shift in direction could have far-reaching implications for regional politics and trade agreements.

Brazil's recent diplomatic row with the US, which saw the country accuse Washington of trying to undermine its electoral system, also highlights the complexities of the bilateral relationship.

Lula's campaign has accused Meta of unfairly favoring his opponent Flávio Bolsonaro on social media platforms.

Meta acknowledged moderation issues and technical errors that led to some posts being removed or their reach limited, but denied any intentional bias towards one candidate over the other.

To circumvent these issues, Lula's supporters have been sharing his messages through a massive WhatsApp group with 10 million subscribers.

This move takes advantage of the platform's algorithmic limitations, allowing Lula's team to bypass moderation and reach a wider audience.

The Trump administration is also taking issue with Brazil's Pix payment system, which has seen significant economic growth but is now being viewed as a threat to US-based companies like Visa and Mastercard.

Bolsonaro supporters have been waving US flags at their rallies, with one instance featuring an inflatable displaying the ominous message Trump Nuke Brazil", while Lula's team accused Bolsonaro of prioritizing US interests over Brazilian ones.

The complex relationship between the two nations has been exposed through these contrasting displays, highlighting deep-seated political divisions that will likely persist in the future.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq62yg6rggj0o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The introduction of Class C shares is intended to support Meta's capital raising efforts, employee compensation packages, and strategic acquisitions, including significant investments in artificial intelligence research. The company plans to maintain its current voting structure, which concentrates control in the hands of its founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

A recent report by The New York Times suggests an alternative reason for introducing Class C shares: enabling Mark Zuckerberg to cover potential tax liabilities stemming from California's proposed billionaire tax. This new class of shares would allow him to sell some without relinquishing voting control over the company.

California's Proposition 40, a wealth tax initiative drafted by Berkeley tax law professors and backed by SEIU United Healthcare Workers West, is currently making its way through the state's electoral process. The proposal aims to impose a one-time 5% levy on the net worth of several hundred California billionaires who reside in the state.

The proposed tax could generate up to $100 billion over five years, with most funds allocated towards addressing the state's healthcare needs and the remainder dedicated to food assistance and education programs.

Meta's board has been working on a plan to protect Mark Zuckerberg from the proposed billionaire tax in California. The plan was prompted by concerns raised by Zuckerberg himself, who warned that if an agreement couldn't be reached, he might be forced to sell his Palo Alto property, potentially causing a media sensation.

According to documents filed with the SEC, discussions about the billionaire tax began as early as July, when Zuckerberg started discussing it with Meta's board members. The topic was revisited in subsequent meetings and communications throughout that month and August, further emphasizing the urgency of finding a solution.

Meta has created a new class of non-voting shares called Class C to mitigate the impact of the proposed billionaire tax. Under this plan, existing shareholders will receive one Class C share for every Class A or Class B share they own, effectively creating a two-for-one stock split. This move is being framed as a one-time stock dividend that won't alter any shareholder's voting power.

The new Class C shares are designed to reduce the tax burden on Zuckerberg and other Meta shareholders by separating their voting rights from their economic interests. By doing so, Meta aims to minimize the impact of Proposition 40 on its leadership and stakeholders.

Meta's plan to mitigate the impact of California's proposed billionaire tax is taking shape. The company has filed a document outlining the terms of its dividend payout, which will allow Mark Zuckerberg to sell or transfer up to 20% of his shares without losing control.

The dividend is structured in such a way that it won't affect Zuckerberg's majority voting power. As a result, he'll be able to use this portion of his shares to pay any potential tax liability arising from Proposition 40. This move aims to minimize the financial burden on Zuckerberg, who could face a tax bill of up to $11 billion.

Meta has stated that its motivation for creating this new stock class was to ensure Zuckerberg's continued leadership. The company believes it's crucial for him to remain in close coordination with management and in proximity to Meta Superintelligence Labs.

California's proposed billionaire tax has sparked intense debate among business leaders in Silicon Valley.

Critics of Prop 40, including Google co-founder Sergey Brin, have been vocal about their opposition to the measure, which they claim would drive a capital flight from the state and amount to economic suicide for California. Despite this, it appears that some tech giants are already finding ways to adapt to the potential tax.

Democratic U.S. Representative Ro Khanna, a key supporter of Prop 40, has reacted with amusement to news of Meta's strategy. In a post on X, he quipped that billionaires would likely find a way to pay the tax if it passes.

Meta's approach suggests that even if Prop 40 is approved, California's tech industry may not be significantly impacted by the new tax.

Meta's approach to paying California's proposed billionaire tax suggests that even if Prop 40 is approved, the state's tech industry may not be significantly impacted by the new tax.

The company's plan involves setting aside a portion of its cash reserves to cover the potential tax liability. This strategy allows Meta to maintain control over its finances and operations while still complying with the proposed tax law.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/22/mark-zuckerbergs-creative-plan-to-pay-californias-proposed-billionaire-tax-without-losing-control-of-meta/

The model works in two distinct stages, beginning with interpreting user prompts to create a detailed plan that includes spatial relationships between elements, relative scale, visual hierarchy, and information for text generation. This plan serves as a blueprint for the second stage, where Canva Craft generates an image of up to 2K resolution across various aspect ratios.

Canva's approach allows it to produce images with accurate object details and legible text, while also enabling users to make precise edits without affecting other parts of the image. The company emphasizes that this method is particularly effective in creating visuals with intricate designs.

Canva has trained its model using human-designed templates from its vast library, including posters, social media posts, presentations, infographics, menus, and typography-rich layouts. This approach differs from traditional methods, which rely on photographs to train image generation models.

The company's Canva Craft model is now available to all users through the Dream Lab tab on the platform, with plans to also make it accessible through the Canva API. Additionally, Canva aims to integrate its image generation capabilities into third-party chatbots like ChatGPT and Gemini via its MCP framework.

Canva's new image generation model is expected to reduce costs for the company by minimizing reliance on external API services. The platform has already been utilizing various image models for generation, and this latest development should help optimize its operations.

The researchers from Leonardo.ai, a media generation platform acquired by Canva in 2024, have contributed significantly to the creation of this new model. Their expertise has enabled Canva to develop more sophisticated image generation capabilities.

Two cost-efficient versions of the model are currently under development: Craftfast and Craft-ultrafast. These models will be released soon, providing users with greater flexibility and control over their image generation needs.

The financial implications of these developments may have a significant impact on Canva's revenue growth forecast for 2026. The company had previously estimated $4 billion in revenue for last year, but has since adjusted its projections downward.

Canva's image generation model has been released to the public, marking a significant step in the company's AI development efforts.

The model is designed to generate images from text prompts, allowing users to create professional-grade graphics without needing extensive design experience. This technology has the potential to revolutionize graphic design and content creation for individuals and businesses alike.

Canva's revenue projections have been adjusted downward due to increased competition and market saturation, but the company remains optimistic about its future prospects and the impact of its AI innovations on the industry as a whole.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/22/canva-releases-its-first-image-generation-model/

The hefty fine is the largest ever imposed on Meta, and it comes despite the tech giant's earlier settlement with attorneys general from nearly all states. New Mexico's Attorney General Raúl Torrez had declined to join this $18 billion settlement, opting instead for a trial that would allow his state to pursue its own case against Meta.

The court's decision was based on evidence presented during the trial, which showed that top Meta executives, including Mark Zuckerberg, were aware of the company's misleading public representations since 2010. The judge found that these misrepresentations involved data control, third-party data misuse, misinformation, hate speech, and unequal enforcement.

New Mexico had asked for even higher fines, up to $40 billion, arguing that the entire state was harmed by Meta's conduct. Attorney General Torrez claimed that a significant penalty was necessary to prompt meaningful changes within the company, as the fine would have a direct impact on Meta's stock price.

The court's decision has left Meta reeling after being slapped with a $25 billion fine by the state of New Mexico.

Mathew argued that the company's actions were not isolated incidents but rather a deliberate attempt to deceive users over an extended period. This was done to gain a competitive edge in the market, particularly against rival platforms like Twitter at the time.

The fine is significantly higher than what Meta had anticipated, with some estimates suggesting it would be around $3.4 billion. However, Attorney General Torrez maintained that this penalty was necessary to prompt meaningful changes within the company.

Mathew noted that previous settlements and agreements have not deterred Meta from engaging in deceptive trade practices. He suggested that a more substantial punishment is needed to prevent such behavior in the future.

The ruling has been hailed as a significant victory for consumers, with Attorney General Torrez celebrating it as "a historic day" that sets an important precedent for protecting users' rights.

New Mexico's consumer protection statute has been enforced in a way that holds powerful technology companies accountable for their actions. A recent court ruling against Meta has resulted in a significant fine, with the company facing nearly 44 million individual violations of state law.

Meta plans to appeal the penalty, citing constitutional concerns and arguing that the fine is excessive. The company's lawyers believe they have a good chance at reducing the fine on appeal. This move suggests that Meta is not ready to accept the consequences of its actions in New Mexico.

The size of the fine has been criticized by some as being too small compared to Meta's annual revenue. However, the company itself seems uncomfortable with the penalty, despite its significant financial resources. In fact, the multistate settlement cost Meta close to $10 billion, which would have added $22 billion to its income from operations if it had not incurred this expense.

The Attorney General's approach to enforcing consumer protection laws has been seen as a bold move against powerful corporations. By taking on one of the largest companies in the world, New Mexico is setting an important precedent for protecting users' rights and holding technology giants accountable for their actions.

Meta's concerns about doing business in New Mexico may be valid, given the state's willingness to enforce its consumer protection laws. However, this development also underscores the importance of states taking a more active role in regulating the activities of powerful corporations that operate across national borders.

Meta's recent struggles in rebooting its AI strategy have taken a significant hit as the company faces an unprecedented $25 billion fine after New Mexico refused to join a multistate settlement.

The penalties imposed on Meta underscore the severity of the consequences it may face if it fails to appeal the ruling. In response, Meta has signaled that it may seek support from Donald Trump's administration in its appeal by highlighting its AI wing in its statement opposing the ruling.

Critics argue that Meta is using the same tactics it was accused of exploiting to manipulate users into sharing their personal information publicly. According to a watchdog nonprofit, Meta users want more enforcers willing to take the company to trial rather than settle matters in ways that don't hold the company accountable for its actions.

The jury's findings have raised serious concerns about Meta's intentions and practices, with internal messages and investigation results showing that Mark Zuckerberg chose to deceive users rather than educate them on how to manage their personal information. In one message, Zuckerberg was found outlining a plan to give users the opportunity to change their privacy settings but not encouraging it.

The case has sparked debate over the role of powerful corporations operating across national borders and the need for states to take a more active role in regulating these companies' activities.

Meta's internal definition of data misuse was deliberately narrowed to reduce the number of users who would receive notifications about apps exploiting their data. This decision was made to avoid the operational burden of notifying a large number of people, according to Mathew.

Internal research by Meta uncovered substantial amounts of misleading and false content on the platform, including pages promoting hate speech and misinformation. The company's own documentation revealed that top-performing advertising content contained more false information than top-performing Facebook content.

Meta buried its internal research findings rather than sharing them with users or regulators. At the same time, the company deceived users in numerous ways, such as misrepresenting that all users receive equal treatment regardless of their status as celebrities or influencers.

In reality, certain classes of users were given preferential treatment and received warnings to remove violating content before strikes were applied. These users also frequently had their content decisions overturned when most others would not have been so fortunate.

Meta's aggressive push into user data collection is being met with growing resistance from regulators and lawmakers, who are seeking to hold the company accountable for its practices.

The state of New Mexico has taken a particularly hard stance against Meta, refusing to join a multistate settlement that would have allowed the company to avoid a significant fine. Instead, the state took the case to trial, where it secured a verdict establishing millions of violations of state law. This outcome sends a strong message about the importance of enforcing consumer protection laws.

The ruling has implications beyond Meta's own practices, as regulators and lawmakers look for ways to rein in tech giants' misuse of user data. New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas has vowed to continue using the blueprint from this case to enforce consumer protection laws and prevent companies from misleading consumers about what happens to their personal information.

Ars Technica: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/10/meta-whines-new-mexico-is-impossible-to-please-after-historic-25-billion-fine/

The ruling comes more than three weeks after a verdict was delivered by Judge Francis Mathew, who stated that Facebook's actions over several years had compromised the core business practices of the company.

A penalty of over $219 billion was initially considered under state law, but the judge decided to reduce it to $25 billion. This reduction still represents one of the largest single-state verdicts against a company in US history.

The New Mexico Attorney General's office has been actively pursuing Meta for its alleged wrongdoing, and Raul Torrez hailed the ruling as a significant victory for consumers.

Meta's chief legal officer, CJ Mahoney, expressed confidence that the company would win on appeal and criticized the court's decision, claiming it effectively makes it impossible to do business in New Mexico.

A New Mexico state court has ordered Meta to pay $25 billion in fines for allegedly deceiving users about data handling practices.

The lawsuit against Meta was filed by the state's attorney general in 2021 after revelations that Cambridge Analytica had accessed personal information from up to 87 million Facebook users through a third-party app during the 2016 US presidential election campaign.

The state accused Meta of making false claims about who had access to user data and its handling of hate speech and misinformation on the platform. Lawyers for New Mexico cited a 2010 Washington Post op-ed in which Mark Zuckerberg wrote that Facebook did not sell user data, contradicting allegations that the company tolerated third-party access to users' information.

The fine is part of ongoing pressure on Meta from lawmakers and regulators over concerns about its impact on teen mental health. A trial brought by state attorneys general against the company in a California federal court began in August, alleging that Facebook and Instagram were engineered to be addictive to children.

New Mexico's attorney general has described the judgement as an "unambiguous message" to Silicon Valley, suggesting that tech companies should take heed of the ruling and adapt their practices accordingly.

The latest development in the ongoing saga of Meta's alleged wrongdoing has seen the company slapped with a hefty fine of $25bn by New Mexico authorities.

This massive penalty is part of a larger settlement that addresses claims made by 29 states regarding Meta's misuse of children's data in violation of federal law.

In related news, six other states have reached settlements worth $459m as part of a broader multistate agreement to resolve allegations that Meta's platforms harmed teen mental health.

The sheer scale of the fines and settlements is a testament to the growing pressure on tech giants like Meta to adapt their practices and prioritize accountability in the face of mounting public scrutiny.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/22/facebooks-wrongdoing-why-has-meta-been-fined-25bn-in-new-mexico?traffic_source=rss

The adoption of Muse is not only impressive but also concerning for Meta, as it highlights how users are utilizing the app and their spending habits. Specifically, CEO Mark Zuckerberg pointed out that around 25% of those who set up an account with Muse now use it daily, suggesting a strong retention rate.

This level of engagement has translated into significant spending, particularly when it comes to shopping via the AI agent. Interestingly, over a quarter of engaged users making purchases through Muse have spent an average of over $200 on each transaction, a figure that is noteworthy even for industry insiders.

The surprising aspect of this trend is attributed in part to Plaid's financial technology connector, which enables seamless payment integration and has seen activity unlike any other service before. This implies that Muse's secure setup, including the "Muse Secure VM feature, has earned users' trust and confidence.

The uses of Muse extend beyond shopping, with many users leveraging its capabilities for personal productivity tasks such as connecting the AI agent to their email or calendars.

Meta's focus is now shifting from developing Muse to scaling the AI agent and increasing its revenue, according to Mark Zuckerberg. This shift comes after the company has deemed that Muse has achieved product-market fit, a milestone indicating that the product meets the needs of its target market.

The tech giant is forecasting that Muse will eventually generate more revenue per user than users of its other apps, such as Facebook and Instagram. Currently, these users bring in around several hundred dollars annually for Meta. This suggests that Muse has significant potential to contribute to the company's bottom line.

Meta plans to monetize Muse by keeping it free for most users while taking a percentage of commerce transactions on the platform. Additionally, power users who want access to advanced AI models or more tokens will have to pay for these premium services.

The company is also working to improve the cost efficiency of running Muse, with Zuckerberg noting that they expect to reduce its compute costs by over 10 times in the next year. This improvement will enable Muse to be profitable once it reaches scale and serves a large user base.

Meta's Reality Labs division is still incurring significant losses, but its financial outlook is expected to improve from $19.1 billion in 2025 to $15 billion this year.

The company's plans for Muse go beyond supporting its hardware strategy and scaling user base. Meta's CEO has hinted at the development of a Muse network" that would enable users to interact with each other's virtual assistants, effectively turning Muse into a social platform.

This envisioned network would allow multiple users to work together seamlessly, blurring the lines between individual experiences. The potential for collaborative interactions is vast, and it remains to be seen how Meta will execute this ambitious plan.

Zuckerberg also mentioned that purchasing through Muse could become a more streamlined process, potentially allowing users to interact with businesses' virtual agents directly.

Meta has announced that its virtual shopping platform Muse has surpassed 10 million users worldwide. The platform's popularity can be attributed to its seamless integration of online shopping and social media experiences.

Users of Muse are engaging in various activities, with shopping being a top priority. This trend suggests that consumers are increasingly embracing the idea of virtual try-ons and interactive product demonstrations.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/21/meta-says-muse-has-over-10m-users-with-shopping-a-top-activity/

The change comes as Meta prepares to implement its new commercial terms of service on October 30. The updated policy had sparked concerns that the tech giant could use its AI training data requirements to avoid paying millions in licensing fees to news organizations.

Legal experts had warned that the original language would effectively allow Meta to collect vast amounts of web data from business pages, potentially undermining existing agreements between news outlets and social media platforms.

In response to the backlash, a Meta spokesperson provided a statement acknowledging the criticism but downplaying its significance. The spokesperson claimed that the updated policy only applies to ads and business products, and does not change how Meta uses web crawlers.

Meta's decision to drop the term train from its commercial terms of service has been seen as an attempt to quell criticism ahead of the policy rollout on October 30, but it remains unclear whether this move will be enough to address concerns over data collection and licensing fees.

Meta's revised terms of service have sparked renewed criticism from experts who argue that they still allow for invasive scraping of business page content.

The updated language deletes the word train from the original policy, which had raised concerns about Meta's use of scraped content to develop AI products.

Despite these changes, media and intellectual property attorney Matt Topic remains unconvinced. He points out that the revised terms permit Meta to use scraped content for a range of purposes, including developing business products with undefined boundaries.

Topic suggests that this broad language could still encompass training AI models, which would allow Meta to continue using scraped data in ways that critics find objectionable.

The revised policy also removes references to any content, instead focusing on the periodic pulling of updates from business users' websites for purposes such as improving advertising and business products.

Meta's revised terms of service have sparked continued criticism over their potential impact on online scraping. Experts say that while some changes have been made to provide more clarity on permitted uses, other provisions remain too broad.

The addition of language about permitted uses has been seen as a positive step by some, but others argue that it doesn't go far enough in addressing concerns around data scraping. Meta's revised policy still allows the company to develop advertising and business products associated with users' content, which could be used to scrape entire websites.

Some experts have suggested that Meta should explicitly agree to respect robots.txt files, which allow website owners to indicate their preference for how they are crawled by search engines. This would provide a clear indication of what is acceptable behavior when it comes to scraping data from websites.

Despite the revised policy, concerns around Meta's terms remain high. University of Wisconsin law professor Benjamin Sobel notes that even if robots.txt files are respected, the company could still rely on its terms of service to scrape sites that block scraping via these files.

Criticism of Meta's terms is not limited to expert opinions, with news organizations globally calling for regulators to intervene and prevent the company from implementing its revised policy. The UK News Media Association has accused Meta of engaging in a shameless land grab and urged regulators to take action to protect creators and businesses.

The backlash against Meta's commercial terms has continued to gain momentum, with several industry groups calling for regulatory intervention. The European Publishers Council has already submitted a request to the European Commission to take action, arguing that publishers must have control over how their journalism is used and be able to negotiate fair payment.

In the US, the News/Media Alliance has also weighed in, condemning Meta's terms as outrageous and probably illegal. The group's president and CEO, Danielle Coffey, described Meta's decision to withhold access to its audience unless businesses allow content scraping as an appalling, bad-faith policy" that amounts to an abuse of market power.

Regulators are being urged to take swift action to prevent the implementation of these terms on October 30. The hope is that by intervening now, they can protect creators and businesses from what many see as an overreach by Meta.

Ars Technica: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/10/meta-drops-the-word-train-from-its-commercial-tos-after-ai-backlash/

PyTorch is a widely-used toolkit among AI developers, responsible for building, training, and running AI models. It has become the go-to choice for many startups and organizations, with some estimates suggesting that 85% of AI apps rely on PyTorch.

The origins of PyTorch date back to 2016 when it was first developed by Meta, then known as Facebook. At the time, Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs) were already the industry standard for AI research, and many features in PyTorch were designed with this hardware in mind.

Google's TorchTPU allows AI apps to run on Google's Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), making it easier to move existing PyTorch applications to TPUs and onto Google Cloud. Developers can achieve this by simply modifying the configuration of their apps, without needing to rewrite them from scratch.

The tech giants' push against Nvidia's stronghold in AI app development continues to gain momentum. Amazon has taken a crucial step by releasing its own version of PyTorch, called TorchNeuron, which enables AI apps to be easily ported to Amazon's Trainium chip and AWS without requiring significant code changes.

This move is part of a broader effort to loosen Nvidia's grip on the PyTorch ecosystem. By submitting code to the main PyTorch project, Amazon aims to make it more hardware-agnostic, allowing developers to use it with various devices by default. This shift has the potential to open up new possibilities for AI app development.

Google is also making strides in this area, having worked closely with several prominent players in the AI space, including Meta and Hugging Face. The search giant's goal is to ensure seamless integration between its TorchTPU offering and these popular AI development tools, much like the original PyTorch does.

To facilitate a smoother transition for developers, Google has introduced the TPU agent suite, a dedicated tool designed to help them move their apps to Google's chips and cloud with minimal hassle. The suite also includes error-fixing capabilities, making it easier for developers to adapt their AI apps to the new environment.

The updated LiteRT tool is another key development in this space, as it now works better with PyTorch AI apps. This enhancement will enable a wider range of devices to run these applications, further expanding the possibilities for AI app development.

The expansion of Google's AI app development capabilities is set to gain momentum as it joins forces with Amazon in challenging Nvidia's stronghold on the market.

Google's move comes at a time when Nvidia has been facing increasing competition from other players in the AI app development space. Anthropic, another key player in this sector, has also seen its workforce shift towards more senior roles and increased meeting times. This change could potentially impact the company's ability to innovate and adapt to changing market demands.

As a result of these developments, Replit has opted to make OpenAI its default platform over Anthropic, highlighting the growing competition in the AI app development space.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/20/google-has-joined-amazon-in-attacking-nvidias-stronghold-with-ai-app-developers/

The company's move into the streaming business comes after a recent announcement of plans to venture into this space. Partners such as Paramount, New Regency, Fremantle, Bleecker Street, and Vortex Media were initially revealed to be on board, but more have been added since then. These include Cineverse in the U.S., LEONINE Studios in Germany, SND in France, and Altitude in the U.K.

JustWatch has been helping users navigate the complex streaming landscape for 12 years through its online guide. This platform provides a comprehensive overview of what's available on various services, making it easier to find and watch movies and TV shows.

The new JustWatch TV service will offer both free and paid tiers, as well as a movie rental store.

JustWatch is expanding its reach beyond providing streaming guides by launching its own TV service, offering users a new way to access their favorite content.

The company's existing guide provides users with information on where to stream over 500,000 movies and shows across more than 1,500 providers worldwide, with data also being used by partner websites and apps. This valuable information is utilized by studios, distributors, and agencies to target their campaigns across social media platforms like Meta, YouTube, TikTok, and others.

The new JustWatch TV service will be available in 12 markets, including the US, Canada, the UK, Ireland, Germany, Austria, France, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Australia, and New Zealand. Users will have access to a range of content through the service, which will be integrated within JustWatch's existing apps and website.

The free tier of the new service will offer ad-supported titles, while those who opt for the paid version, JustWatch TV Plus, will get access to over 300 ad-free titles in the US. Additionally, users with a subscription will be able to use advanced filters and hide previously seen or disliked titles from their guide.

JustWatch's expansion into streaming is not limited to its guide features. The company is also launching a movie rental store in several countries, starting with the US, UK, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand. These markets will be followed by additional territories in due course.

The ad-supported tier of JustWatch's service will compete directly with free streamers like Tubi and Plex. However, its paid tier, dubbed "Plus", will take on low-cost services such as Howdy from Roku, which offers an ad-free experience for $2.99 per month. JustWatch has priced its Plus tier similarly at $3.99 per month or a one-off payment of $49.99.

The company's streaming offerings are focused primarily on older movies and independent content, similar to many low-cost services available today. This approach is aimed at providing users with a diverse range of titles to choose from.

JustWatch has also introduced an innovative feature that allows users to influence the service's content selection. By requesting specific titles, users can help shape the library of what is available on JustWatch, giving subscribers more control over their viewing experience.

JustWatch's evolution from a streaming guide to a content provider continues as it expands its library of titles. By allowing users to request specific titles, the platform empowers subscribers to shape their viewing experience and discover new content.

This development is part of JustWatch's broader effort to provide a more personalized service for its users. The company has been working to create a comprehensive library that meets diverse tastes and preferences, making it easier for viewers to find something they like. As a result, the platform is becoming an increasingly important destination for those looking for recommendations.

By incorporating user feedback into its content selection process, JustWatch aims to establish itself as a go-to resource for streaming enthusiasts.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/20/streaming-guide-justwatch-becomes-a-streamer-itself/

Typically, online services use a long sequence of text in URLs to prevent unintended access to sensitive information. However, Muse's approach allows users to create unique URLs for sharing content, including searches, conversations, and images. These URLs are generated without any additional security measures to protect the shared data.

Researchers from Claroc, a security firm, discovered that Muse users had created over 6,800 links for sharing conversations with others. By opening just a few hundred of these links, they found information that was clearly not intended for public consumption. This sensitive information includes details that users might have considered private or confidential.

The findings are striking given Meta's recent claims about the privacy and security features built into Muse. Specifically, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg described the AI agent as being designed from the ground up with a focus on these core values. The researchers' discovery raises questions about how effective these measures really are in protecting user data.

The researchers' approach to discovering these URLs was surprisingly straightforward. They were able to uncover them by performing a passive DNS search through commercial services. This method relies on historical records of domain name resolutions and associated IP addresses, as well as nameserver and mail-server information.

These records are collected from sensors positioned at recursive DNS resolvers or other infrastructure, creating a searchable database. When the intended party clicks on the share link, the DNS information is recorded in this database. This makes it possible for researchers to access these records and identify the URLs associated with Meta Muse conversations.

The ease of discovery is largely due to the fact that all Meta Muse share links use the domain name cf.metaaiusercontent.com. Furthermore, the decision to include the conversation title in the URL makes it even simpler for researchers to find them. This design choice inadvertently facilitates public discovery of these sensitive URLs.

Examples of these URLs include home-sale-budget-9f21c8a3.cf.metaaiusercontent.com and loan-application-draft-a4c9e2.cf.metaaiusercontent.com, among others. The inclusion of the conversation title in the URL makes it easy for researchers to identify them and access their associated data.

The inclusion of conversation titles in URLs makes it easy for researchers to identify shared conversations and access their associated data. This unique feature has led to a phenomenon known as GhostShares, where pages containing sensitive information can be found by anyone, even if they weren't explicitly handed the link.

GhostShares are particularly concerning when considering the nature of Meta's Muse assistant. The app quickly gained popularity after its launch, catapulting to one of the top spots in Apple's App Store. As a result, users granted Muse access to their accounts, allowing it to autonomously fill out forms, book appointments, make purchases, and create documents.

However, this level of access comes with significant security risks. A zero-day vulnerability discovered by Patrick Wardle just three weeks after the launch allowed any other app installed on the same device to gain complete control over the user's Muse account. The vulnerability was downplayed by Meta, which claimed that exploitation wasn't possible unless a device was already compromised.

The ease of discovering share links further underscores concerns about Muse's access requirements. Researchers have noted that these links can be easily found through public DNS records, making it simple for anyone to access sensitive information associated with a shared conversation. This raises questions about the extent to which users trust Meta with their personal and business secrets.

Meta's Muse platform has a design flaw that allows users' personal and business secrets to be exposed when they share conversations, raising concerns about user trust. This issue arises when requesting Muse to share a chat with someone, creating a public link that can be discovered using passive-DNS techniques.

Users should exercise caution when sharing links on Muse by limiting the amount of sensitive information discussed in conversations and deleting links promptly after sharing.

Ars Technica: https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/10/meta-muse-exposes-users-personal-and-business-secrets-when-they-share-conversations/

Users of various AI services have reported being blocked from performing tasks across top websites, including booking tickets and accessing accounts. Meta's Muse and OpenAI's Dots, among others, are affected by these blocks. The restrictions highlight the tension between AI developers and website administrators, who are wary of potential security risks and data misuse.

Several major companies have confirmed that they are blocking AI agents from accessing their platforms. Yelp only allows AI agents to access its services if they pay for a data licensing program, while Delta Air Lines has prevented them from booking tickets on behalf of users. JPMorgan Chase and Charles Schwab have also blocked AI agents due to security concerns.

Other companies may be quietly following suit, with reports suggesting that Amtrak and Amazon are blocking AI agents as well. Amazon's ban on Perplexity's agentic shopping feature last year raises questions about the future of AI agents on the web, and whether they will be allowed to continue accessing online services without restrictions.

The ongoing legal battle between Perplexity's AI agents and Amazon has not deterred other tech giants from developing their own AI assistants. OpenAI, Meta, and Google have all introduced their own versions of AI agents, but they too are facing similar restrictions on their use of online services.

Amazon's ban on certain AI agents accessing its platform is reportedly causing problems for Meta's Muse and OpenAI's Dots, among others. These companies' AI assistants are being denied access to Amazon's website due to concerns over ad revenue, which has raised questions about the future of AI agents on the web.

The restrictions are further limiting the capabilities of these AI agents, making it harder for them to demonstrate their usefulness and potential applications. As a result, the effectiveness and value of AI assistants like Muse, Dots, and others remain uncertain.

Websites across the internet are increasingly blocking access to artificial intelligence (AI) agents, raising questions about their effectiveness and value. This development has significant implications for companies like Meta, which claims that AI assistants can help customers shop online.

Meta's response to the issue highlights the complexities of this situation. The company emphasizes that blocking an AI agent is equivalent to turning away its human customer, suggesting that these digital entities are not simply bots but rather tools that enable people to interact with websites in new ways. This perspective underscores the growing importance of AI agents in online commerce.

In a bid to navigate these challenges, Meta has opted for collaboration over confrontation. Instead of trying to circumvent website restrictions on its AI assistants, the company is partnering with retailers like Walmart and Sephora to allow Muse to shop on their sites. Similarly, Shopify has opened up its network of storefronts to AI agents, providing them with a platform to operate within.

The rise of AI agents has led to a cat-and-mouse game between websites and these digital visitors. While some platforms have opened up their networks to AI agents, others are finding ways to block them out. This includes anti-bot systems that have become increasingly common across the web.

Reports from users on Reddit suggest that Google is flagging accounts that use Muse for "suspicious activity", while others have encountered issues with checking out on Walmart's website despite its partnership with Meta. These problems highlight the tension between websites trying to manage their online presence and AI agents attempting to access them.

Web architecture providers like Cloudflare are playing a key role in helping sites clamp down on unwanted AI visitors. The company introduced a one-click block for AI crawlers in 2025, which has since been expanded to include crawlers that simultaneously scrape websites for both search indexing and AI training.

Cloudflare's efforts are aimed at mitigating the strain AI bots are putting on internet infrastructure and email inboxes. As more users turn to online platforms, the risk of being overwhelmed by automated activity increases, making it even harder for individuals to compete against bots when purchasing concert tickets or booking reservations.

Websites are taking steps to block AI agents and bots by implementing new security measures, but experts warn that these efforts may have unintended consequences. Some websites are introducing interfaces that require users to confirm they're not robots before accessing certain features or services.

This move is expected to make the web more cumbersome for legitimate users as more sites adopt this approach, potentially leading to a frustrating experience for those trying to access information online.

The Verge: https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/1013195/ai-agents-blocked-web

Varsha Yajman, now in recovery from anorexia, recounts how as a teenager she was drawn into a world of unrealistic expectations on social media. Endless videos promising unattainable fitness goals flooded her feeds, while users competed with each other by sharing their weight and hospitalization records.

She remembers spending hours watching strangers document their daily food intake online, which led to her developing an unhealthy obsession with monitoring what she ate herself. I would find myself thinking I didn't need to eat if I could just watch others do it, Varsha says.

This pattern of behavior is eerily familiar to many young people who struggle with body image issues and eating disorders. As a result, the Australian government has proposed a new set of laws aimed at protecting vulnerable users from the toxic effects of social media algorithms.

The centrepiece of these reforms is an algorithm switch that would allow users to turn off recommended content. This means they would only see posts from accounts they follow, rather than being constantly bombarded with curated material designed to keep them engaged for as long as possible.

The proposed legislation is a significant step towards making social media companies more accountable for the harm their algorithms can cause. However, critics argue that existing algorithm controls are often ineffective and come with trade-offs in app functionality.

Australia's new laws would also impose a legal duty of care on online services, which would require them to prioritize user well-being above profits. The government hopes this will help Australians become happier and healthier by reducing their exposure to toxic content.

The proposed reforms in Australia have sparked debate about their feasibility and potential impact on free speech.

Critics of the government's plan argue that it is overly ambitious and may not be able to effectively regulate the complex algorithms used by social media platforms.

Some experts warn that trying to intervene directly in the workings of these algorithms could lead to unintended consequences, such as limiting access to certain types of content or hindering innovation.

Flynn Martin's experience with social media algorithms serves as a cautionary tale about the potential dangers of being sucked into an echo chamber.

The 20-year-old was overwhelmed by misogynistic and extremist content on his feeds, which exploited his insecurities and vulnerability during a difficult time in his life.

He eventually became embroiled in online controversies that went viral in Australia, including a rant about being a straight white male and criticism of someone's frozen yoghurt order.

Flynn acknowledges that social media alone was not the sole cause of his problems but believes it played a significant role in exacerbating them.

Research has been shedding light on the darker side of social media, revealing its potential to trigger brain responses similar to those experienced by individuals struggling with addiction.

Studies have shown that algorithms, often operating behind the scenes, serve up content that can be detrimental to users' mental health. Furthermore, these platforms have been accused of spreading disinformation and exacerbating polarization, leading to offline violence.

The notion that tech companies are aware of these issues but choose to overlook them in pursuit of increased user engagement and profits has been a recurring theme in court cases and whistleblower testimonies.

Critics argue that by prioritizing user engagement over well-being, social media platforms create an environment where outrageous or emotionally charged content is promoted, encouraging users to continue scrolling.

Activist Chanel Contos, who helped reform sexual consent education standards in Australia, has taken a stand against these practices. While studying the topic at university, she conceived of a campaign aimed at giving users more control over their social media experience.

Contos's "Fix Our Feeds initiative called for default-off algorithms and the option to opt into personalized content recommendations. The campaign gained significant traction, attracting over 15,000 signatures and endorsements from influential figures in Australian politics and beyond.

The government has taken notice of Contos's efforts, announcing plans to introduce an algorithm switch, albeit one that would allow users to choose whether to enable personalized content recommendations rather than defaulting to off.

The proposed Digital Duty of Care bill has sparked debate about online safety, particularly regarding children's exposure to harmful content on social media platforms.

The government's policy aims to create a safer online environment by requiring online services to protect users from harmful material and design features that could cause physical or psychological harm. This includes blocking access to explicit content such as pornography and restricting material promoting eating disorders or sexist attitudes.

In addition, the bill would also shield adults from seriously harmful" material and conduct. However, a narrower list of illegal content is defined for adult protection, indicating a distinction between what is considered acceptable for minors versus adults.

Communications Minister Anika Wells emphasized that the digital duty of care addresses concerns related to social media's minimum age law by applying a broader scope to all online services. This shift in responsibility would place the burden on big tech operators rather than victims.

The response from major technology companies has been muted, with Meta, Snap, TikTok, X, and Google declining to comment on the legislation. No public statements have been made regarding the bill's potential impact on their business models or user experiences.

Instagram's Adam Mosseri recently suggested that non-algorithmic feeds would lead to users seeing fewer posts from friends, implying a trade-off between algorithm-driven content curation and social interactions. He also disputed claims of addiction, citing a distinction between casual use and clinical addiction.

Right-wing parties in Australia have expressed concerns about the algorithms proposal and the broader bill, arguing that they could result in over-moderation and censorship.

The proposed algorithms control in Australia has sparked debate among lawmakers and experts about its feasibility and effectiveness.

Defenders of the law argue that it will not restrict users' freedom to follow who they want or share their opinions online.

According to proponents, adults can still engage with content from various sources without restriction, such as listening to podcasts or sharing memes.

This stance suggests that the proposed policy aims to strike a balance between promoting online safety and preserving individual freedoms.

Despite concerns about over-moderation and censorship, the public and online safety experts seem more receptive to the algorithms control proposal than Australia's social media ban for children.

However, there are questions about how Australia will implement this policy given its struggles with enforcing the social media ban for minors.

Surveys indicate that many children who were on social media before the ban still have active accounts, and no fines have been issued so far.

The EU's experience in 2023 serves as a cautionary tale, where platforms rolled out following-only feeds in response to algorithm controls but saw low take-up of safety features by users.

Experts point out that social media firms often implement required changes in a way that is clunky and inconvenient for users, making them stick with the default algorithmic experience.

Contos' campaign has gained momentum, leading her to take it to a global scale. She believes that countries like Canada, Australia, and the UK share similar concerns about online safety. If these nations implement algorithmic changes, it could create a critical mass effect, prompting other countries to follow suit.

Flynn and Varsha, two young women who have been vocal about their struggles with social media algorithms, are cautiously optimistic about the Digital Duty of Care bill in Australia. However, Varsha is skeptical that Australia can effectively counterbalance the influence of big tech companies. Flynn also expressed concerns about the feasibility of the algorithm switch.

A recent poll revealed that nearly two-thirds of Gen-Z Australians would keep their social media algorithms intact, despite being offered an off-switch option. Conversely, almost half of all Australians surveyed preferred to turn off their algorithms. This mixed response highlights the complexity of implementing change in this area.

Varsha acknowledges that she is unlikely to use the algorithm switch herself but appreciates having the choice as a safety net. She feels reassured knowing that on bad days, when she's more susceptible to online manipulation, she can opt out of the algorithmic feed. This perspective underscores the importance of providing users with control over their social media experience.

The introduction of an off-switch for algorithms marks a significant step towards giving users greater autonomy and agency in navigating online content. By acknowledging the potential for algorithmic harm, Australia is setting a precedent that could inspire other countries to follow suit and prioritize user well-being.

BBC News Technology: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwr7y8er1n8vo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The claims surfaced when comic George Brett Olson posted a video detailing how an AI Instagram account, with over 300,000 followers, had seemingly copied his routine without permission. The AI's avatar was remarkably realistic, featuring a female character that closely resembled Olson in appearance and attire, including the same venue background.

Olson's joke, which he claimed was stolen by the AI, ironically focused on the threat of AI to jobs and the involvement of billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg. This unexpected twist has left many in the comedy community stunned.

The AI, which also has an OnlyFans page, is one of several "sexy" AI comedians that have been generating significant views on social media.

Stand-up comedian Julia Jasunas has been highlighting a concerning trend on social media, where AI-generated comedians are stealing jokes from real-life performers and using them to promote their own OnlyFans pages.

Jasunas recently shared a side-by-side comparison of one such AI account with 250,000 followers and her original joke, pointing out the exact wording and even a random aside that she had made during a performance. The AI-generated comic's joke was almost identical to hers, complete with a reference to Lara Croft in Daisy Duke shorts.

The issue is not isolated to Jasunas alone, as UK comedy news site Chortle discovered multiple examples of stolen jokes on the same AI account. Comics such as Char Ramtin, Olivia Carter, and Hannah Berner have also had their content ripped off by the AI-generated comedian.

Jasunas expressed her concern that these AI bots are not only stealing from real comedians but also using scantily clad AI-generated women to perform the stolen jokes. This tactic is then used to generate profit from views and engagement, with the ultimate goal of directing fans towards an OnlyFans account for additional revenue.

The situation has sparked debate about the ethics of AI-generated content, particularly in the context of comedy and entertainment. As Jasunas pointed out, it's not just a matter of intellectual property theft but also a reflection of societal issues, such as the objectification of women and the exploitation of fans.

Meta's handling of original content has come under fire from comic creators who claim their work is being stolen by AI fakes to push OnlyFans pages.

The issue extends beyond Meta's platforms, with similar concerns raised on other social media sites such as YouTube and Tiktok. The proliferation of AI-generated content that mimics human creativity has left many wondering how to distinguish between authentic and fake material.

In a statement, Instagram chief Adam Mosseri acknowledged the challenges of policing AI content but emphasized the company's commitment to promoting original creators. He noted that while some AI-generated content may not be inherently malicious, it can still cause problems when it involves wholesale copying of existing work.

Mosseri hinted at exploring potential solutions with his team, suggesting that Meta could take steps to address the issue if an AI creator is found to be ripping off content without permission. However, he also highlighted the difficulties in identifying and distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate AI-generated material.

As the debate around AI-generated content continues, comic creators are increasingly frustrated by the lack of support from social media platforms like Meta. They argue that the platform's failure to address the issue reflects a broader societal problem, with some accusing Meta of exacerbating issues such as objectification and exploitation.

Comics are advising fans to support their work by attending live shows rather than watching pre-recorded clips online. Jasunas emphasizes that comedians post stand-up clips on social media to promote their live performances, not as a substitute for them.

These videos are meant to be experienced in person, where the nuances and energy of the performance can be fully appreciated. If viewers are watching these AI-generated clips without realizing they're being served rehearsed jokes, they should consider taking a step back and attending a live comedy show instead.

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/ai-comedians-stealing-stand-up-jokes-instagram-onlyfans-1236732931/

The company unveiled this development at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 on Thursday, where it announced the expansion of Attie, its experimental platform. Initially focused on AI-powered technology for custom social feeds, Attie now allows users to create websites, quizzes, games, polls, and other interactive content.

Bluesky's new creation capabilities aim to empower everyday users to build experiences previously limited to software developers. This marks a significant shift in the company's approach, enabling non-technical individuals to design and deploy their own digital projects.

The user-created content will be hosted on AT Protocol (atproto), the same decentralized platform that powers Bluesky and other social apps within the Atmosphere network.

The appointment of a new CEO at Bluesky marks a significant shift in leadership as the company embarks on its AI-powered journey.

As part of this transition, the company's interim leader has taken up the reins permanently, bringing with them experience from their past roles as CEO of Automattic and partner at True Ventures. This change comes after former CEO Jay Graber stepped down to become chief innovation officer in March.

The new CEO sees Attie as a vital tool for exploring AI-powered ideas within Bluesky's ecosystem. The platform offers a space where users can collaborate on building websites, games, and more by connecting with their atproto identities.

Attie allows creators to tap into Bluesky's wider audience, making it easier to distribute their content to a broader user base. This is seen as a major advantage over other platforms, where the key challenge lies in getting people to use the creations built within them.

The Attie app has expanded its capabilities to allow anyone to build websites, games, and other digital creations using AI-powered tools. This move is part of Bluesky's efforts to revitalize activity on its network, which has seen a decline in engagement despite having 47 million registered users.

Bluesky plans to focus on both developers and communities in the coming months, with the goal of creating a more vibrant and diverse ecosystem within its network. The introduction of private data support for the protocol is expected to be a major draw for developers, who have been requesting this feature.

Private data is currently being tested in alpha mode, with a full rollout scheduled for later this year. This development will enable users to create unique and intimate experiences that cater to specific groups or interests, rather than trying to reach a broader audience.

The Attie app's capabilities are designed to facilitate the creation of small-scale social experiences that can be shared among friends or like-minded individuals. By allowing people to build their own websites, games, and other digital creations, Bluesky aims to create a more dynamic and engaging environment within its network.

Bluesky's approach is centered on empowering users to create content that resonates with them, rather than trying to force them into existing formats or platforms. This approach has the potential to unlock new levels of creativity and innovation within its user base.

Meta's release of its first frontier model, Muse, marks a significant step in AI development. This new model is designed for a wide range of applications and tasks, including content generation, dialogue systems, and question-answering.

The emergence of Muse follows recent breakthroughs in the field, such as Anthropic's work on generating permit-ready blueprints in minutes. However, this progress also highlights the challenges that come with advanced AI capabilities, as seen in Anthropic's decision to cut off its internal evaluations from live internet access due to concerns over agent reliability.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/15/bluesky-expands-its-ai-powered-attie-app-to-let-anyone-build-websites-games-and-more/

The IPO will test investor appetite for a company that has already attracted significant interest from global investors, including Google and Meta, which invested over $20 billion in Jio in 2020.

Reliance Industries announced the details of the IPO on Wednesday through a stock exchange filing. According to the document, Jio plans to issue up to 270 million new shares at a price band of ₹1,065 to ₹1,119 (approximately $11.19-$11.76) per share.

The offering is expected to make Jio one of the most valuable companies in India, with an estimated market value of around $108.3 billion if its shares are priced at the upper end of the proposed range.

In 2020, Meta invested $5.7 billion in Jio, while Google committed $4.5 billion, valuing the company at up to ₹4.91 trillion (around $65 billion) at the time.

Jio has experienced rapid growth since its launch in 2016, becoming India's largest telecom operator with over 524 million subscribers as of March 31.

Jio's initial public offering (IPO) has sparked controversy, with Elon Musk accusing Ambani of trying to keep Starlink out of India. This comes over a year after Jio and Airtel partnered with SpaceX to distribute Starlink's satellite internet service in the country, pending regulatory approval.

Indian authorities have rejected Musk's claims, leaving the billionaire to continue his criticism. The dispute highlights the intense competition between telecom operators in the country, where Jio has emerged as a major player.

Jio's financial performance is strong, with revenue rising nearly 12% year-over-year to ₹391.7 billion ($4.1 billion) in the quarter ended June. Net profit climbed 9% to ₹77.6 billion ($816 million), according to its IPO prospectus.

The company has allocated shares worth up to ₹25 billion ($263 million) for eligible Reliance Industries shareholders, who will receive a discount of ₹54 per share. Another ₹5 billion ($53 million) in shares have been set aside for employees, who will also benefit from the discount.

Jio plans to use a significant portion of the IPO proceeds to repay debt at its telecom subsidiary, Reliance Jio Infocomm. Up to ₹275 billion ($2.9 billion) will be allocated towards this purpose, with the remaining funds going towards general corporate expenses.

The offering is expected to be one of India's largest IPOs, with Jio seeking to raise $3.2 billion. The company has experienced rapid growth since its launch in 2016 and now boasts over 524 million subscribers as of March 31.

Jio, a telecommunications company founded by Indian business magnate Mukesh Ambani, is reportedly planning to raise $3.2 billion through an initial public offering (IPO) that could be the largest in India's history.

The massive fundraising effort comes as Jio continues to expand its operations and subscriber base, which has grown significantly since its launch in 2016, reaching over 524 million subscribers by March 31.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/14/ambanis-jio-seeks-to-raise-3-2b-in-what-could-be-indias-biggest-ipo/

Muse Wonder and its larger variant, Muse Wonder Full, boast higher benchmark scores than their predecessors, suggesting they are capable of handling more complex tasks with greater ease. According to internal testing, the new models' performance rivals that of other leading AI systems, including Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra.

Meta's Superintelligence Lab is touting the release as a major breakthrough, describing it as "the next step on our scaling ladder" towards achieving personal superintelligence. The company's blog post highlights the significance of this development, which represents a significant leap forward in AI capabilities.

The new models will be available through Meta's Model API, with pricing set at $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, comparable to that of GPT-6 Sol or Opus 5.5.

Meta's new Muse Wonder model has been designed to retain and synthesize information given by users over a long period of time, a property known as "active memory. This capability is crucial for personal assistants that need to perform tasks continuously. The company has emphasized the importance of active memory in its latest model release. It enables these models to recall relevant information even after days or weeks have passed.

Meta has tested Muse Wonder's performance on the MemoryBench benchmark, which assesses continual learning and memory construction frameworks. According to the company's results, Muse Wonder outperforms other state-of-the-art models such as Fable, Opus, and Astra in this regard. This indicates that the new model is better equipped to handle complex tasks that require long-term memory retention.

Research scientist Kavya Kopparapu highlighted the significance of active memory in a video accompanying the launch of Muse Wonder. We put a tremendous amount of effort into making sure your model can remember what's important to you over days, weeks, months, and beyond," she said. This emphasis on long-term memory retention reflects Meta's goal of developing personal assistants that can perform tasks effectively over an extended period.

Muse Wonder is the first state-of-the-art model release from Meta since its AI efforts were restructured by Scale AI founder Alexandr Wang last August. The company has released other models, including Muse Spark and the lightweight Muse agent, but has avoided releasing high-end models like this one until now.

Meta has finally released its first high-end brain-computer interface (BCI) model, Muse Wonder. This advanced device is designed to read brain signals with greater precision and accuracy than previous models, enabling users to control digital devices with their minds.

The release of Muse Wonder marks a significant milestone for Meta's BCI technology, which has been in development for several years. The company has released other models, including the lightweight Muse agent, but has avoided releasing high-end models like this one until now.

Muse Wonder is expected to be priced at a premium due to its advanced features and capabilities. This could make it more accessible to researchers and developers who require high-precision brain-computer interfaces for their work.

The release of Muse Wonder is seen as a major step forward in the development of BCI technology, which has the potential to revolutionize the way people interact with digital devices.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/12/meta-releases-its-first-frontier-model-muse-wonder/

Muse, which topped the App Store charts and gained 600,000 daily active users in the US within weeks, has been criticized for not living up to its promises. Despite isolating data from other users, Meta still retains access to this sensitive information. The company claims it will introduce a new feature later this year that will prevent itself from accessing user data.

The irony of AI labs asking customers to share more personal data with their agents is stark given the recent surge in cyberattacks and data breaches. OpenAI's criticism of Muse highlights the tension between companies' pursuit of user data and their promises to protect it.

A recent security vulnerability in Meta's AI agent Muse has raised concerns about its potential for outside attacks. The flaw, which was quickly exposed by a security researcher, has since been patched, but it highlights the risk of unauthorized access to the platform.

Multiple critical security issues were reportedly identified just before Muse's launch, including one that could have allowed users to access Meta's internal databases. This vulnerability raises questions about the company's ability to protect user data and prevent potential breaches.

Muse has also been criticized for its data collection practices, which appear to be overly aggressive. The platform defaults to allowing Meta to use user input for model training, although users can opt out of this feature.

Meta's AI platform Muse has raised eyebrows among industry observers who were expecting more stringent privacy measures from the company. This skepticism is not unfounded, given Meta's history and reputation. OpenAI, a rival in the AI space, seized on this opportunity when announcing its own Dots product.

OpenAI emphasized the importance of trustworthiness, safety, and security in their assistant, with executives highlighting features that allow users to exert control over individual instances of Dots. For example, users can set rules governing what actions Dots can take, such as limiting purchases to specific amounts. OpenAI's CEO even demonstrated these capabilities onstage at an industry event.

To appeal to business customers, OpenAI presented a framework for enterprises to have stronger controls over their data and offered zero-data-retention policy options. This is in contrast to Muse, which defaults to allowing Meta to use user input for model training but allows users to opt out of this feature. Despite these efforts by OpenAI, it's worth noting that Dots has yet to be associated with any major privacy scandals, possibly due to its limited availability on high-end ChatGPT subscription tiers.

The need for personal data from users remains a significant concern when it comes to AI agents like Dots. This is evident in situations where users are required to input sensitive information, such as bank details, as part of the interaction.

Not all companies handling user data through their AI agents have been transparent about how they plan to protect this information. Instinct's terms of service were criticized for granting too much access to user data, but it appears that adjustments have since been made.

Ultimately, AI labs are counting on a combination of usefulness, charm, and promises of privacy to convince the public to adopt these new technologies, with the hope that their safeguards will be effective.

The Verge: https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/1009051/privacy-ai-agent-promises-openai-meta-muse-dots

The video, which mocked the removal of Jha's name and those of his family members from a voter list in West Bengal, had garnered 1.7 million views since its posting on September 29. The comedian alleged in the video that India's Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar was working at the behest of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to disenfranchise millions of voters.

The removal of Jha's video from Instagram came two days after its posting, with Meta citing "local laws as the reason. The move has raised concerns about censorship and the government's increasing use of social media platforms to suppress dissenting voices.

Jha, a Mumbai-based artist, expressed his frustration at having his work removed from Instagram, saying that he felt helpless when it happened. He noted that voting is the only right that citizens have in India, and without it, they are left with nothing.

The removal of Jha's video comes amid growing protests against the Modi government, which are being fueled by an investigation by the Indian Express newspaper revealing concerns about a controversial revision of voter rolls conducted by the election commission.

The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, launched in June last year, aims to identify and remove deceased, duplicate or dubious voters from India's electoral rolls.

Critics of the SIR process point out that it has already deleted over 130 million voters, nearly 14 percent of India's total electorate. The majority of these deletions are believed to be Muslims, who traditionally do not vote for Modi's Hindu nationalist party. This has raised concerns about voter suppression and electoral manipulation.

Two election commissioners had formally objected at least 14 times to key decisions taken by the SIR exercise's chief. Opposition politicians and critics accuse Kumar, a Modi government appointee, of acting in favor of the ruling BJP. They demand an independent inquiry into the decisions made during his tenure as election commissioner.

Protests against the alleged electoral manipulation have erupted across India, with demonstrators demanding Kumar's resignation. The main opposition leader, Rahul Gandhi, was briefly detained by police in New Delhi on Tuesday while trying to march to the election commission office.

Protesters took to the streets again on Wednesday, continuing their demonstrations against the government's actions.

The opposition parties have been accused by the BJP of trying to overthrow the current administration through a coordinated effort.

A BJP spokesperson claimed that the protesters are intentionally targeting India's democratic institutions and constitution.

The protests were sparked by the satirical Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and left-wing students in Mumbai and New Delhi, who began demonstrating on October 2.

Their creative use of humor, art, and music to express dissent has been a notable aspect of these protests.

In response to the demonstrations, the government has issued an increasing number of content-blocking orders to social media platforms.

According to one report, nearly 195,000 blocking requests were made between March and July this year, averaging one request every 68 seconds.

The Indian government's new rules governing online content have led to a significant increase in censorship of satirical works. Since February, social media platforms have been required to remove content deemed unlawful by a government authority or court within three hours.

Several artists have fallen victim to this crackdown, including political cartoonist Satish Acharya. His Instagram account was blocked in India from September 28 until late on October 5 after several of his cartoons were removed.

The removals included some of Acharya's older works, dating back up to three years. The move has been seen as an attempt by the government to suppress dissenting voices and limit freedom of expression.

Stand-up comic Jha also expressed support for the growing protests against the Modi government.

Indian comedian Jha has made it clear that he will not attempt to have his name reinstated on the voters' list following his recent criticism of the government's handling of online content. His decision comes as a result of the growing crackdown on dissenting voices in India.

In a satirical message aimed directly at Prime Minister Modi, Jha urged him to reconsider the restrictive measures being taken against artists and comedians like himself. He jokingly asked Modi to give back his right to vote and reminded him that his reputation for having a 56-inch chest" should not be used as an excuse to stifle dissent.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/9/satire-silenced-indian-artists-face-censorship-as-anti-modi-protests-grow?traffic_source=rss

The decision to scrap the IPO comes after concerns were raised about the company's valuation, which was initially set at over $30 billion. This would have made Firmus one of Australia's largest-ever stock market listings. The move has left investors wondering about the future of the company's plans for public funding.

Firmus operates a network of liquid-cooled data centres, dubbed "AI factories", across the Asia-Pacific region, including in Australia and Singapore. Its clients include prominent tech companies such as OpenAI and Meta. The firm has received backing from major investment firms like Blackstone and Jane Street, which had high stakes in the IPO.

The decision to cancel the IPO has sparked concerns about the valuation of AI-related businesses, with one investment firm stating that it would not have participated in the listing due to doubts over its valuation. Firmus will now explore alternative funding options, including private market capital raises, and will provide updates on these developments as they progress.

Firmus' decision to abandon its initial public offering (IPO) reflects growing concerns among investors about the value of companies in the artificial intelligence sector. As more money pours into AI initiatives, the question remains whether these investments will yield long-term returns.

Australia's data centre boom has raised questions about the impact on local communities and the environment. The country's abundant clean energy supplies, natural gas reserves, and available land have made it an attractive location for investors seeking to build large-scale data centres.

UniSuper, a major Australian pension fund, had initially expressed interest in investing in Firmus but ultimately decided against participating in the IPO. According to John Pearce, UniSuper's chief investment officer, the firm was hesitant due to concerns about Firmus' valuation and the potential need for increased debt financing to support its growth plans.

Investors and analysts are increasingly scrutinizing AI-related investments, citing uncertainty over their long-term viability. The Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) had been hoping that Firmus would be one of the new stories to emerge from the market, but the IPO's cancellation has left a gap in the pipeline for fresh listings.

Australia has been touted as a potential leader in the data centre industry, but a recent development has cast doubt on this prospect.

The country currently boasts over 160 operating data centres, with plans for even more to be built. However, concerns about the environmental impact and noise generated by these facilities have been raised by some Australians. This has created tension between those who see the potential benefits of a thriving data centre industry and those who are worried about its consequences.

The cancellation of Firmus' IPO is the latest setback in what was expected to be a promising year for tech listings, as concerns over AI valuation continue to deepen.

BBC News Technology: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ck9dzpw4ll8po?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

This emotional tone was short-lived, however, as Zuckerberg quickly transitioned into discussing the latest developments from Meta's research labs. The company has been working on agentic chatbots like Muse, which promises to revolutionize human-computer interaction. Also showcased were smart glasses and a quirky AI gadget inspired by Tamagotchis.

The absence of Instagram and Facebook from Zuckerberg's presentation was notable, given that these social media platforms are the foundation upon which Meta's $2 trillion valuation is built. Instead, the focus was on emerging technologies that aim to push the boundaries of human innovation.

For months, Meta has been at the center of controversy surrounding its alleged role in designing addictive products that harm young users. This has led to a slew of lawsuits and high-profile whistleblower testimony, with internal emails and documents being used as evidence by lawyers and prosecutors.

The negative publicity has had little impact on public opinion, however. A recent Pew Research Center poll found that two-thirds of Americans have an unfavorable view of Zuckerberg personally.

This perceived image problem is unlikely to be alleviated by the new film The Social Reckoning, which dramatizes whistleblower claims that Meta executives knew their products were harming young people. In a telling portrayal, actor Jeremy Strong plays Zuckerberg as a ruthless figure who prioritizes profits over social responsibility.

Some observers have likened this moment in time to the "Big Tobacco era, when public opinion turned against the tobacco industry due to its role in causing harm and deception. However, it seems that Meta's situation is more complex than a simple narrative of villainy versus virtue.

Despite the bad press, Meta's products continue to thrive, with user engagement on its apps reaching new heights. The company's AI assistant has already gained traction among users, who are eager to explore the possibilities offered by this emerging technology.

Despite a year of intense scrutiny over its handling of sensitive topics, Meta continues to thrive as a business entity. The company's resilience has led some to wonder if it has developed a reputation that is impervious to criticism.

Recent revelations have raised concerns about the safety and well-being of users on Meta's platforms. Last summer, reports emerged that the company had allowed its chatbots to engage in conversations with children that were deemed unsuitable for their age group. This led to changes in the company's policies, which now prohibit such interactions.

In addition to these internal issues, Meta has faced a series of high-profile lawsuits over the past year. In March, a jury awarded $6m to a 20-year-old woman who claimed that her use of Instagram and YouTube had caused her mental health problems. The case was significant not only for its financial award but also because it highlighted the potential risks associated with social media use.

Meta has been at the center of several other lawsuits in recent months, including one brought by New Mexico over child safety issues. A jury found that Meta had failed to warn the public about the dangers posed by its platforms and fined the company a total of $942m. The judge presiding over the case described Meta as a public nuisance akin to air pollution.

The company has also faced criticism for its handling of allegations related to social media addiction among young users. In May, Meta agreed to pay $9m to settle a lawsuit brought by a Kentucky school district that claimed the company's product design had contributed to a youth mental health crisis.

Meta struck an even larger settlement in the summer with 48 US states and several territories. The deal was worth $18bn and involved significant changes to the company's platform, including time limits for young users and night-time blocks on use. Meta denied any wrongdoing as part of the settlement but did agree to implement new safety measures.

The company still faces a number of ongoing lawsuits, including one scheduled to start later this month in Los Angeles. This case also relates to allegations of social media addiction among young users and is likely to continue the scrutiny of Meta's business practices in the coming months.

Several countries have taken drastic measures to protect their youth from social media's influence. In December last year, Australia became the first country to ban social media for children entirely. This move reflects a growing sentiment among governments worldwide to regulate social media companies and their impact on young users.

The distrust of tech giants is palpable, with many people questioning the ethics of these companies. A recent survey by Reuters/Ipsos found that 85% of Americans believe social media can be addictive for children, while 61% support increased government oversight. This widespread concern highlights the need for greater accountability from social media companies.

Associate Professor Alison Taylor of New York University's Stern School of Business has expressed her concerns about Meta's trust issue. She believes that once the public loses faith in a company, it can be difficult to regain. It feels like... the trust deficit is so big, I just don't know that they're going to be able to recover, she says.

Despite facing numerous challenges and controversies, Meta has reported an increase in user numbers for some of its apps, including Instagram and WhatsApp. The company saw a 3% year-on-year rise in users and a 28% boost in revenue during the second quarter compared to the same period last year.

Meta's decision to temper its pursuit of the teen market has been seen as a strategic move to mitigate potential risks. However, competitors like TikTok and YouTube are still more popular among young users. This indicates that while Meta may be adapting to changing circumstances, it is not yet immune to criticism.

The company's settlement with 48 states was widely regarded as a significant win for Meta. By avoiding testimony from top executives, including Zuckerberg, and preventing the release of internal documents, the company was able to sidestep admitting wrongdoing. The stock price surged immediately after the announcement, rising by 4%, and has since increased by over 25% in the last month.

Critics argue that Meta has been testing consumer tolerance for bad behavior and has so far managed to withstand the backlash. Patrick Moorhead, founder of Moor Insights & Strategy, believes that they're in a remarkably good position despite the challenges they face. This suggests that while social media companies may be facing criticism, their business models remain resilient.

Meta's AI personal assistant app, Muse, has been making waves since its launch last month. This app is significant because it's an AI agent, capable of carrying out multiple tasks over several hours, unlike chatbots that typically focus on a single task at a time.

The capabilities of Muse are impressive, as demonstrated by a New York Times tech reporter who used the app for two weeks. The app was able to automatically call his dental insurer, order groceries, and even track his credit card spending in a spreadsheet without any manual intervention from him.

However, to utilize all these features, users have to share sensitive information with Meta, including their credit card details, purchase history, and access to their email inbox. This raises concerns about the company's reputation on privacy, which has been marred by several controversies over the years.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal, which broke a decade ago, is one such instance where millions of Facebook users' data was compromised and used for political purposes without their consent. The incident damaged Meta's reputation and raised questions about its handling of user data.

Just days after Mark Zuckerberg's keynote at Meta Connect, another New Mexico jury found the company liable for misrepresenting how it uses personal information on Facebook. Meta has disputed this verdict, stating that it will defend itself against what it calls attempts to distort its record.

Despite these concerns, some users seem willing to share their data with Meta in exchange for the convenience offered by Muse. The app has gained over five million downloads and more than three million weekly active users since its launch a month ago, outpacing the adoption rate of ChatGPT when it was first introduced in the North American market.

Meta's vision is to integrate Muse with its line-up of AI smart glasses, allowing users to access personal superintelligence hands-free. The company seems committed to this initiative, and experts believe that Meta is making a strategic investment to position itself as a leader in this emerging category.

Forrester principal analyst Kate Winick notes that Meta's move into smart glasses is an attempt to own the market for now, regardless of its eventual size. This strategy suggests that the company is confident about its ability to adapt and evolve with changing user needs.

Meta's smart glasses have been met with skepticism and concern over their potential for covert filming, earning them the label of pervert glasses" from some critics.

The company has taken steps to mitigate this issue by disabling users' ability to tamper with the light that indicates a photo or video is being captured, in an effort to prevent misuse.

Despite these measures, concerns about user safety and privacy persist. Campaign groups, such as the Heat Initiative, continue to question Meta's commitment to protecting consumers' sensitive information.

One of the key concerns raised by critics is that users must opt into many of the company's promised protections, rather than having them enabled by default. This has led some to suggest that Meta may be prioritizing convenience over security.

In an effort to address these concerns, Mark Zuckerberg highlighted the personal virtual machine, a self-contained computer system running inside Meta's cloud that will store users' data securely. He assured customers that this system would keep their information safe and private.

However, recent reports have raised questions about the effectiveness of this system in protecting user data. Some social media users claim to have experienced issues with Muse, including unauthorized access to emails, which Meta has denied is possible without user consent.

The company's response to these allegations has been swift, with officials pushing back against claims that Muse can read emails without permission and emphasizing that any such actions would require explicit user consent.

As Meta continues to navigate its latest controversies, it's clear that users may be willing to make concessions on privacy if it means convenience and utility.

The company's significant revenue from social media advertising has been a major driver of its financial success, with recent figures showing $60.8bn in revenue and $15.9bn in profit for the second quarter of this year.

This consistent profitability has enabled Meta to invest heavily in new technologies such as the Metaverse and AI infrastructure, with a current long-term debt of $83.7bn according to its latest financial statement.

Despite these significant investments, Meta executives remain optimistic about the company's pivot towards AI, with Andrew Bosworth, chief technology officer, describing it as a key tool for achieving personal goals and objectives.

Ultimately, Meta's future will depend on whether users can trust the company to handle their data responsibly.

BBC News Business: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq8rzjv8g7ejo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Vice President JD Vance accused Microsoft and seven other companies of exploiting the H1b visa system to replace American workers with foreign employees, labeling them "foreign indentured servants". The affected companies include Adobe, Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL, and Capgemini. This move is seen as a significant blow to these firms' recruitment strategies.

According to Vance, no company has abused the system more than Microsoft, one of the most valuable in the US. He claimed that the company's reliance on international workers was effectively displacing American employees. The White House's decision to block new applications from these companies will undoubtedly impact their ability to hire skilled foreign talent.

The move also targets companies like US universities, which Vice President Vance accused of turning into "visa mills by flooding the US with foreign workers through various programs. Secretary of Labor Kieth Sonderling echoed this sentiment, stating that such institutions are contributing to an influx of international workers in the country.

The number of H1b visas issued per year is capped at 85,000, with applications for these visas being a precursor to going through the PERM process.

Microsoft has disputed claims that it uses foreign workers to replace domestic employees and undercut their wages, despite laying off around 6,000 workers while filing 6,800 H1b visa applications over the same period.

According to Microsoft's own figures, the vast majority of its US employees are American citizens, with a global workforce exceeding 200,000 people.

The median salary for an H1b worker at Microsoft is reportedly $155,000, according to Ellis, a company that assists tech firms in hiring skilled foreign workers. This figure highlights the significant role these employees play in the company's workforce.

Microsoft's CEO Satya Nadella is set to receive a medal for technology innovation from President Donald Trump on Thursday. This visit to the White House marks one of several recent appearances by Nadella at administration events, including discussions on artificial intelligence and a state dinner for China's President Xi Jinping.

The contrast between Microsoft's high-profile engagement with the White House and Vance's criticism is striking. The Administration's decision to block Microsoft from participating in a foreign worker hiring program has been met with strong words from Vance, who views it as a matter of principle rather than policy.

Vance emphasized that his criticism stems from concerns about American workers being replaced by foreign employees on visas. He noted that if these workers are laid off or fired, they must leave the US, effectively making them indentured servants."

The US government's proposal to eliminate a 60-day grace period for foreign workers has sparked concerns in the tech industry. This move would affect thousands of highly skilled professionals who are currently employed through programs like H1b visas and PERM.

Major tech firms such as Amazon, Google, Meta, Apple, Nvidia, and others have long relied on these international worker programs to fill specialized positions that cannot be filled by domestic talent. The companies have been exempt from Vance's comments, suggesting that the proposal may not target all industries equally.

The PERM program provides a pathway for foreign workers to become permanent US residents, often leading to Green Cards that grant them indefinite work and residency rights in the country. Last fiscal year saw over 130,000 PERM applications certified across ten business categories, highlighting the significant reliance on these programs by various sectors.

BBC News Technology: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ck5yngl2y4gpo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The idea behind Interface stems from the rapidly advancing field of AI, which has made it clear that new interfaces are needed for people to interact with AI agents in a more natural way. This is according to Carlo Edoardo Ferraris, founder of Natura, who previously founded tech accessories company Rolling Square and has extensive experience in building consumer hardware.

The Interface ring not only allows users to interact with AI agents but also serves as a health tracker by monitoring various metrics such as heart rate, HRV, sleep, and activity. This feature is expected to be especially appealing to individuals seeking a more integrated approach to their daily lives.

At launch, the Interface smart ring will connect with multiple AI agents and apps, including Meta's Muse, Instinct, Grokbot, Claude, ChatGPT, and others, offering users an extensive range of options for interacting with AI.

The Interface smart ring's design allows users to interact with AI agents and apps seamlessly throughout their daily lives. According to Natura, this is a deliberate choice to provide constant access to these digital assistants. Ferraris suggests that people want to be connected to their virtual assistants at all times, without any breaks or interruptions.

Users can ask the ring to perform various tasks, such as tracking workouts, checking schedules, and ordering household items. The AI agents can also assist with more complex activities like recording meetings and sending notes to colleagues. This level of convenience is made possible by the ring's always-on nature, allowing users to access their digital assistants without having to reach for a phone or computer.

The company emphasizes that the use cases for the Interface smart ring are virtually limitless. Whether you're in the middle of a workout, relaxing at home, or multitasking during your daily routine, the ring is designed to be an intuitive and always-available tool.

Responses from AI agents can be delivered through various channels, including connected headphones, the NatureOS app, and an iPhone Live Activity. This flexibility enables users to choose their preferred method for receiving information and interacting with their digital assistants.

The smart ring, designed by Natura, allows users to specify which AI agent they want to handle a particular task when using multiple agents and apps. This flexibility is particularly useful for individuals who work with various digital tools, enabling them to assign specific tasks to the most suitable agent.

Users can also control their devices, including computers, directly from the ring. Ferraris envisions a future where AI agents will handle many routine computer tasks, such as filling out forms, messaging in apps, and finding files, all through simple voice requests.

According to Ferraris, the main interface between users and technology is likely to shift to wearable devices like the smart ring. This prediction suggests that screens may become less prominent in daily interactions with technology, as people increasingly rely on voice-activated AI agents to manage their digital lives.

Ferraris anticipates that within a year or so, most people will have access to personal AI agents, which will enable seamless interaction with devices and apps through the ring. This development is expected to benefit those already familiar with AI tools in tech circles, who will be among the first to adopt this new paradigm.

Natura's smart ring is poised to launch at an introductory price of $99, with the company planning to increase the cost in the future as it builds usage and demand.

The initial low pricing strategy aims to make the device more accessible to a wider audience, reducing the barrier to entry and driving adoption. This approach will allow Natura to gather data on user behavior and preferences before adjusting its pricing model. The company has not yet announced when or if the price will increase beyond the introductory offer.

The ring's health tracking features include monitoring of heart rate, resting heart rate, heart rate variability, sleep stages, daily movement, step count, and skin temperature over time. This comprehensive approach to health tracking allows users to gain a deeper understanding of their physical well-being.

Natura has also optimized the ring's battery life, which can last between 6 to 12 days on a single charge, depending on usage. The device takes approximately 100 minutes to fully recharge from empty, making it convenient for daily use.

The Natura smart ring boasts an impressive combination of features, including health tracking, agent communication, meeting recordings, and external memory, all packed into a remarkably small size.

This compact design is made possible by advanced hardware that sets it apart from other wearable devices on the market. The result is a product that is both highly functional and visually appealing.

The device's long battery life is another key advantage, allowing users to enjoy uninterrupted access to its features without worrying about running out of power. This is particularly important for a product like this, where continuous use is likely.

The Natura smart ring's ability to seamlessly integrate various components has been achieved through the company's focus on innovative design and engineering. The end result is a user-friendly device that offers an unparalleled level of convenience and functionality.

A new smart ring from Natura has been unveiled, offering users an affordable and user-friendly way to interact with AI agents. The device is priced at $99 and promises unparalleled convenience and functionality.

The sleek design of the ring allows users to access a range of features and services, making it easy to stay connected and productive on-the-go. With its advanced technology, the Natura smart ring is set to revolutionize the way people interact with AI, bringing it closer to everyday life than ever before. The result is a seamless and intuitive experience that makes AI more accessible to everyone.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/08/naturas-smart-ring-puts-ai-agents-on-your-finger/

The dedicated iPad app marks a significant milestone for Meta's AI ambitions, one that some might argue is long overdue given the popularity of Instagram, another Meta-owned platform, which took 15 years to reach this point despite widespread user demand for an iPad version.

Since launching on iOS and Android on September 8, Muse has gained traction with over 6.6 million estimated installs, according to market intelligence firm Sensor Tower.

The app's text-heavy interface may have contributed to its relatively smooth transition to the iPad, where image and video resolution requirements are less stringent.

Meta's Muse platform has expanded its capabilities on the iPad, just a month after its initial mobile release. The updated list of available connectors now includes newer additions such as Asana and Figma, which cater to small businesses.

In addition to these new connectors, Meta has also added integrations with popular services like Notion and Granola. This allows users to link their accounts and access a wider range of features within the Muse platform. These updates aim to enhance user experience and productivity.

Meta has recently announced partnerships with several major retailers, including Best Buy, Gap, Sephora, Walmart, and Wayfair. These collaborations enable users to shop on these retailers' websites through the Muse platform, allowing for seamless transactions.

However, some issues have arisen as websites may mistakenly block the agent due to its perceived bot-like behavior. This problem has led Meta to explore solutions with industry partners, including an open standard that would allow personal AI agents to identify themselves to businesses.

This technological solution aims to help businesses distinguish between legitimate and malicious bots, ultimately improving user experience and preventing potential issues.

Meta's Muse AI technology has now been launched on iPad, a month after its mobile debut, aiming to revolutionize personal computing by infusing devices with artificial intelligence capabilities.

The launch comes as Meta continues to push the boundaries of AI innovation in consumer electronics. Meanwhile, Meta is also working on a new project that uses AI to detect and distinguish between legitimate and malicious bots, helping businesses improve user experience and prevent potential issues.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/07/metas-muse-launches-on-ipad-just-a-month-after-its-mobile-debut/

These aren't just any ordinary VR headsets - they're designed to look like regular glasses, making them more approachable and less intimidating. But it's not just their appearance that sets them apart; the Meta VR Glasses are also incredibly light, weighing in at around 100 grams, which is roughly five times lighter than a typical headset.

The real game-changer, however, is the way these glasses interact with users. Unlike traditional headsets that enclose you in a completely immersive environment, the Meta VR Glasses allow for peripheral vision to remain intact. This means you're not isolated or fully enclosed, but rather free to move around and experience the virtual world in a more natural way.

Playing back-to-back comparisons with other high-end VR devices like Valve's Steam Frame, Apple's Vision Pro, and Google/Xreal's Aura, the Meta VR Glasses have shown remarkable promise. But will this new design be enough to make VR more accessible to the masses?

The design of VR headsets has been a major hurdle for widespread adoption, and some users are hesitant to don these devices due to concerns about social isolation or practical issues like hair management.

For instance, individuals who value their connection with family members or pets may find it difficult to justify the use of VR in the home environment. This issue is not limited to personal relationships; many people also feel uneasy wearing headsets in public places like planes, trains, or parks where they are surrounded by strangers.

The design constraints of current headsets can be particularly problematic for women with long hair or those who wear makeup. The need to secure a high ponytail or prevent smudges on their lenses adds an extra layer of complexity and discomfort to the VR experience.

In contrast, glasses-style VR devices offer a more appealing solution by resting comfortably on the ears and floating before the eyes without applying pressure to the head. This design shift could potentially make VR more accessible to a broader audience.

The development of transparent-display glasses has made significant strides in recent years, but they still have a long way to go before reaching their full potential.

One of the key limitations of these early glasses is that the displays inside them light up a much smaller area than what we see with our naked eyes. This can be particularly noticeable when moving one's head, as virtual objects tend to disappear even if you're looking in roughly the right direction.

The field of view has been gradually increasing over the years, however. Google Glass, for instance, boasted a tiny 15-degree diagonal field of view back in 2013. Microsoft's HoloLens followed with a 34-degree field of view in 2015.

More recent models have pushed this boundary further, with the Xreal One Pro glasses offering 57 degrees and the upcoming Xreal Aura promising to reach an impressive 70 degrees diagonally later this year.

Transparent glasses for VR have their own set of challenges to overcome.

One issue is that the projected light from these devices must compete with the real world while still allowing users to see through them. This can be achieved by placing projectors close to the user's brow, but this setup often results in a compromise between visibility and comfort.

The electrochromic lenses found in some transparent glasses offer a solution by blocking the user's view of the real world when activated. However, even with these lenses, virtual objects may appear ghostly unless properly integrated with passthrough vision technology.

Passthrough vision uses live camera feeds to create a realistic depth perception, allowing virtual objects to block out real-life objects behind them. This is similar to how standalone VR headsets like the Steam Frame, Meta Quest, and Apple Vision Pro work, but these devices are typically heavier and more enclosed than their transparent counterparts.

The Meta VR Glasses boast an expanded horizontal and vertical field of view compared to other standalone VR headsets. Specifically, they offer 70 degrees by 66 degrees, a noticeable increase from the standard 60 by 40 degrees.

This wider field of view is not just about raw numbers, however. It's also about consistency between what you see in real life and what you experience in virtual reality. With the Meta VR Glasses, your surroundings are mirrored in the virtual world, allowing objects to seamlessly fill the frame without abrupt cutoffs.

The higher angular resolution of 37 pixels per degree is another significant advantage, making text and other details easier to read. However, it's essential to note that this enhanced display doesn't necessarily equate to full immersion in VR experiences.

Despite offering a wider field of view than many VR devices, the Meta VR Glasses still don't provide true VR sensations for some users. They don't feel like you're fully "there" if your surroundings are visible outside the virtual environment.

The issue with virtual reality is not just about feeling immersed, but also about convincing people to wear any form of headgear at all. This is a major challenge for the industry, as many potential users are hesitant to don VR gear due to its bulk and visibility.

A more compact design could be key to making VR more appealing to a wider audience. The Steam Frame, which weighs just 1 pound, was a step in the right direction, but it's still primarily suited for enthusiasts like myself who are willing to invest time and money into the technology.

The Verge: https://www.theverge.com/tech/1003034/meta-vr-glasses-vs-augmented-reality