The show's spoof was led by comedian Druski in his SNL debut, who took on the role of Elizabeth Holmes with Jane Wickline playing the part as well. The skit also featured Ben Marshall portraying Billy Evans, Holmes' husband.

In the sketch, before Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim were confirmed to direct the documentary, Druski was initially set to be a part of it. This twist added an extra layer of humor to the already absurd portrayal.

The mock documentary's origin story was cleverly woven into the skit, with Wickline's Holmes saying It's really important to us that people find out who Liz really is, you know. The scene showcased Druski's deadpan delivery as he responded to the faux Holmes' plea, leaving no doubt about his opinion on her persona.

The mockumentary style of You Can See Everything was playfully mocked on SNL by recreating a memorable scene from the film where Elizabeth Holmes conversed with a filmmaker about potential deception.

A satirical jab was made at the doc's length, humorously suggesting that Druski's own project would be released in 1,000 parts on Instagram Reels. The show poked fun at the idea of Druski's tape being broken down into such a lengthy series titled 'Crazy White Lady Skit'.

A nod to Druski's own popular mock audition show Coulda Been Love was made when Marshall's Evans performed an original song, stating My name is Billy and I make eight figures. However, the skit cut him off before he could continue.

The SNL cast continued to poke fun at the world of documentary filmmaking by having Druski transform into Elizabeth Holmes on stage. Prosthetics were used to bring the character to life, with a voiceover stating And just like Fielder, Druski used reenactments to better understand his subjects.

The impersonation of Elizabeth Holmes by Druski continued throughout the SNL episode, as he and Wickline engaged in a peculiar conversation. Repeating phrases like I'm always being real, they seemed to mirror the Theranos founder's infamous interviews. Druski's portrayal was so convincing that it raised questions about his ability to distinguish between reality and his character.

As host of the evening, Druski had previously warned the audience that he might not adhere to certain guidelines set by SNL producers. He stated that he couldn't promise to avoid using profanity or wearing whiteface makeup, which some viewers found unsettling. The comedian's words seemed to hint at a possible disregard for social norms and conventions.

In another instance of Druski's Holmes impersonation, he claimed to be about to show Wickline one of the most famous comedy videos ever made. Instead, a viral clip of Druski dancing appeared on screen, leaving some viewers wondering if this was indeed what he intended to share. The transition was seamless, and it added to the overall surreal quality of the segment.

The evening's events were also marked by an unexpected guest appearance by Emma Stone, who crashed Druski's monologue. The two actors will soon be seen together in the Universal Pictures rom-com The Catch, which is scheduled for release on May 21, 2027.

The latest episode of Saturday Night Live featured a surprise cameo from Emma Stone, who was playing Elizabeth Holmes in a spoof sketch called You Can See Everything. In a humorous exchange, her co-star referenced a new movie they had just worked on together, where they play love interests - although it's clear that wasn't the original intention.

The unexpected appearance of Texas senator-elect James Talarico added to the show's comedic momentum. He made a surprise call for change in SNL's cold opens, suggesting that people are tired of the same old format and want something new. In response, James Austin Johnson's Donald Trump quipped that he would continue doing the shtick infinity" times.

The sketch ended with a nod to their upcoming film, which will see the two actors play love interests in real life - at least on screen.

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/druski-elizabeth-holmes-snl-you-can-see-everything-skit-1236750276/

Despite a subdued moviegoing atmosphere, with many studios opting not to release new titles on Saturday, the competition between these two films remains intense. The figures from Sunday indicate that You Can See Everything is currently in the lead, having earned $10.6 million in its third weekend and bringing its North American total to $63.8 million.

You Can See Everything, a documentary directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, has been making waves with its Oscar-buzzed reputation and has now set its sights on securing its first No. 1 finish at the box office. It is currently playing in 3,243 North American locations and appears poised to decline by around 43 percent for this weekend.

If You Can See Everything manages to hold onto its lead, it would join a select group of films that have achieved number one status in their third frames, following in the footsteps of True Grit, Argo, and 1917. This achievement would be all the more impressive given the relatively slow overall turnout for moviegoers over the Halloween weekend.

The domestic box office has seen a steady rise in revenue this year, with a total take of $8.46 billion so far, a figure that represents around a 20 percent increase compared to the same period last year, according to Rentrak's data.

The box office performance of Clayface is expected to slow down significantly this weekend, as it looks to decline by around 56 percent from its opening frame.

This decline is likely due in part to the fact that Halloween falls on a weekday this year, which could impact moviegoing habits and reduce overall box office revenue for the weekend. Historically, major releases tend to avoid launching into marketplaces with significant competition from parties and trick-or-treating, particularly on Friday nights.

The domestic box office is projected to see one of its lowest totals of the year, with a predicted $55.6 million for the Halloween weekend. This would represent a 42.1 percent drop compared to last weekend's revenue, according to Rentrak's analysis.

Despite the challenges posed by this quiet Halloween weekend, the horror genre as a whole continues to thrive. The broader picture shows that even in the absence of a major new release, horror films are still performing exceptionally well throughout the year.

Rentrak's Paul Dergarabedian notes that while historical challenges may deter studios from launching major releases into the marketplace during this time, it is possible for a quieter Halloween weekend to coexist with a strong overall performance for the genre.

Laika's stop-motion animated film Wildwood has continued to perform well in its second weekend, earning around $7.5 million from 2,712 North American theaters. This brings the movie's domestic total to $25.8 million, with an impressive decline of approximately 38 percent expected.

Despite its strong box office numbers, Wildwood may have been impacted by families' attention shifting away from cinemas during this weekend. The film has garnered significant critical acclaim, boasting a 99 percent approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes and generating buzz for potential Academy Award recognition. However, with a reported production budget of $100 million, it will need to demonstrate sustained performance in the coming weeks.

Black Bear's Wicker, another romantic fantasy film, has also shown impressive staying power, declining by around 28 percent from its opening weekend. It grossed $4.1 million from 2,374 North American theaters over its second weekend, bringing its domestic total to $13.2 million. Critics have praised the movie, awarding it a strong 94 Rotten Tomatoes score.

Wicker's success is likely due in part to the star power of Olivia Colman and Alexander Skarsgard, who bring depth and nuance to their roles. The film's unique premise and beautiful cinematography may also be contributing factors, drawing audiences into its quiet village setting and enchanting narrative.

Rounding out the top five is Paramount and Legendary's Street Fighter, which added $3.2 million to its domestic total in its third weekend. Internationally, the movie collected an additional $3.2 million, bringing its global sum to $91.9 million on a budget of $82 million.

Sony's Resident Evil is expected to secure seventh place at the box office, having now crossed $400 million globally in its seventh weekend of release.

Its projected domestic earnings for the current frame are estimated to be around $2.5 million, which would bring the North American total to a significant $157.3 million. This figure reflects the success of director Zach Cregger's adaptation of the popular video game, starring Austin Abrams.

Meanwhile, Sony Pictures Classics' The Only Living Pickpocket in New York has expanded its reach, moving from six screens last weekend to 1,112 North American locations this week. With a sophomore frame earnings of $1.9 million, it is likely to secure ninth place at the box office.

The film, directed by Noah Segan and starring John Turturro as an aging pickpocket dealing with a theft gone wrong, has garnered positive reviews. Chief film critic David Rooney praised the movie in his review, describing it as "contemplative, cool-headed and transfixing".

Despite the slow pace of box office earnings over the Halloween weekend, industry analysts predict that business will pick up dramatically as the 2026 holiday season approaches.

As the calendar shifts towards the end of the year, several high-profile titles are set to be released, including The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping and Avengers: Doomsday. Experts anticipate a surge in box office earnings as these films hit theaters, potentially leading to a record-breaking December for movie theater attendance.

The box office is set to heat up next weekend with three new films vying for attention. The animated adaptation of Dr. Seuss's classic tale, The Cat in the Hat, will be joined by Godzilla Minus One and Wild Horse Nine.

These releases are expected to provide a much-needed boost to movie theater attendance, which has been relatively quiet over the Halloween weekend despite strong competition from horror movies like Clayface.

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/you-can-see-everything-clayface-box-office-halloween-1236744345/

The film, directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, offers a nuanced portrayal of Holmes' final weeks before prison, avoiding simplistic characterizations. Instead, it highlights her ability to evoke sympathy from those who are aware of her wrongdoing.

Tyler Shultz, a key whistleblower at Theranos, doesn't need the documentary to remind him of Holmes' manipulative tactics. As one of the first employees to expose the company's inaccuracies, he recalls how faulty blood testing devices made their way into Walgreens stores and delivered false results to patients.

Theranos reached an astonishing valuation of around $10 billion before its technology was revealed to be ineffective. The company relied on third-party equipment for most of its tests, using its own machines only for a small fraction of the work.

As the world becomes increasingly reliant on artificial intelligence, a cautionary tale from the Theranos scandal is resurfacing. The company's rise and fall serves as a reminder of the dangers of unchecked ambition and the ease with which investors can be swayed by charismatic leaders.

Theranos' story has taken on new significance in the current AI boom, where companies with questionable track records are raising massive amounts of capital. This phenomenon is not limited to large venture firms; individual investors are also being targeted with promises of high returns.

Tyler Shultz, a whistleblower from the Theranos scandal, is sounding the alarm about the potential for deception in the AI industry. He notes that the model used by Elizabeth Holmes, where she would meet with investors over coffee and secure funding without providing substantial evidence, has been scaled up to unprecedented levels.

Shultz' grandfather, George Shultz, a former U.S. Secretary of State and Treasury, was an investor and board member at Theranos. He echoes his grandson's concerns about the power that comes with investing in companies like Theranos.

Theranos' funding often came from individual investors such as the DeVos and Walton families, rather than traditional venture firms. The company kept its scientific information and evidence behind closed doors, citing trade secrets, which may have contributed to its ability to secure funding without scrutiny.

The recent Theranos scandal serves as a stark reminder of the importance of rigorous due diligence when investing in new technologies. However, some worry that this lesson may be forgotten in the current AI boom, where complex and opaque systems can make it difficult to separate fact from fiction.

Shultz's concerns are particularly pertinent given the ease with which AI-powered tools can be used to deceive investors and the public at large. With the rapid development of new technologies, it is becoming increasingly challenging for even the most seasoned experts to discern what is truly innovative and what is merely a rehashed concept wrapped in a new package.

The difficulty of evaluating complex systems like AI has significant implications for investors who may be tempted to overlook red flags in their pursuit of returns. By failing to conduct thorough due diligence, they risk being duped by companies that are more interested in lining their pockets than delivering genuine innovation.

The recent documentary "You Can See Everything highlights the potential pitfalls of investing in unproven technologies. The film follows a mother as she navigates her final days before serving an eleven-year prison sentence, raising questions about why she would choose to invite a camera crew into her life at this point.

The film also touches on the activities of Elizabeth Holmes and her partner Billy Evans, who are reportedly working on a new diagnostics company called Haemanthus. With $20 million in funding, this venture bears some resemblance to Theranos, which raises concerns about whether lessons have been learned from that company's demise.

The documentary You Can See Everything has raised concerns about Elizabeth Holmes' portrayal, as it glosses over some of the most egregious crimes committed by Theranos, including providing faulty medical information to patients and harassing former employees like Tyler Shultz.

This selective focus on Holmes' persona has contributed to her being more of a celebrity figure than a villain in the public's eye. The documentary's approach may be seen as trivializing the harm caused by Theranos' actions, which had real-life consequences for people who trusted the company with their health.

Tyler Shultz expressed his unease about what might come next for Holmes, given her apparent preparation for a new chapter in her life. He is uncertain about where this second act will lead and whether it will involve more deception or manipulation of those around her.

The documentary's portrayal of Holmes has sparked debate about the impact of media representation on our perception of public figures. While it may be entertaining to watch a charismatic figure like Holmes, the consequences of her actions should not be minimized or ignored.

As the tech industry continues to grapple with the consequences of its own hype, a stark reality is emerging: many companies are failing to deliver on their AI promises.

The latest data suggests that AI has failed to provide a significant financial return for most businesses, according to an Apollo economist who spoke out about the issue. This revelation comes as no surprise to those familiar with the AI graveyard", a running list of projects and startups that have struggled or failed entirely.

The industry's lack of accountability is a major concern, and experts warn that it may be leading to widespread deception of investors and consumers alike, a problem that could have far-reaching consequences.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/30/theranos-whistleblower-tyler-shultz-warns-that-the-ai-boom-is-a-great-opportunity-to-go-deceive-people/

The film's success is all the more remarkable considering it was only released a few weeks ago. Before its premiere at the Telluride Film Festival, very little was known about You Can See Everything. However, since then, the documentary has generated intense buzz, with audiences eager to experience the secrets and surprises that lie within.

One of the key aspects of the film's appeal is its portrayal of Elizabeth Holmes' life in the months leading up to her prison sentence. Viewers knew going into the cinema that the film would depict this period, but they could hardly have anticipated the surreal dynamics between Holmes and her husband Billy Evans, as well as Fielder's own presence on camera.

Fielder's appearance in the film is just one of the many surprises that await viewers. The documentary takes a dramatic turn in its final act, with a flash-forward that finds Fielder and Oppenheim's access to Holmes slipping away. In response to this development, Amanda Seyfried is introduced to help complete the film, reenacting key scenes and conversations from her time with Holmes.

The use of Seyfried in the film has sparked significant discussion among viewers, who are still processing the many revelations and surprises that lie within You Can See Everything. This phenomenon was reflected in a recent Q&A session featuring Fielder and Oppenheim at the SCAD Savannah Film Festival.

During this conversation, Fielder and Oppenheim shared their thoughts on the big surprises in the film, while also acknowledging the challenges of making a documentary that delves deep into the world of a real-life human optical illusion. Their comments offer a fascinating glimpse into the creative process behind You Can See Everything.

Audiences have been drawn to the film's unique blend of intimacy and revelation. By gaining extensive access to its subjects, Fielder and Oppenheim have created a documentary that feels both deeply personal and universally relevant.

The success of You Can See Everything has raised questions about the future of documentary filmmaking. Will this film's bold approach and innovative storytelling pave the way for new types of documentaries? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: You Can See Everything has left an indelible mark on the world of cinema.

Fielder and Oppenheim's collaboration on You Can See Everything marks a significant milestone in their careers. Both directors have built reputations for pushing boundaries and taking risks in their work.

The crew of You Can See Everything consisted of a seven-person team that moved into the household to capture intimate moments. The filmmakers initially considered keeping Nathan Fielder off-camera, but his presence soon became an organic part of the narrative.

Lance Oppenheim recalled how Nathan's interactions with Elizabeth and Billy were being recorded from early on in filming. The footage showed Nathan asking questions, which seemed to prompt nonverbal reactions from the subjects. This unexpected development led Oppenheim to consider using Nathan as a way to pull Elizabeth back into reality.

The initial setup of having seven crew members proved ineffective, particularly when it came to capturing the first nonverbal reactions on people's faces after being asked questions. The filmmakers realized that they were losing crucial moments due to panning between subjects and Nathan.

Nathan Fielder emphasized the importance of capturing these initial reactions in evaluating honesty and sincerity. He noted that a person's response before answering a question can be just as telling as their answer itself.

The crew adapted by pulling the cameras back more and incorporating wide shots to cover the entire house, while also using zoom lenses to capture intimate moments from a distance. This allowed for a balance between capturing the overall environment and focusing on specific interactions.

The team had limited personnel in the household at any given time, with only two or three people besides Nathan and Oppenheim present. This restriction led to creative solutions in terms of camera placement and operation.

Oppenheim mentioned that Jonathan Mitchell, an experienced operator who had worked with Nathan before, was instrumental in capturing key moments on camera. Mitchell's experience proved invaluable in adapting to the unique demands of this project.

The filmmakers' goal was to create a nuanced portrayal of everyday life, highlighting the complexities and subtleties of human interactions. By embracing the challenges presented by their setup, they aimed to produce a thought-provoking documentary that would resonate with audiences.

As the production continued, the crew refined their approach, leveraging their experience and creative problem-solving skills to overcome obstacles and capture the essence of You Can See Everything.

As the crew continued to film Elizabeth's daily life, they began to notice a peculiar phenomenon - before cameras were even rolling, she and her husband would start discussing their plans for the day, often trying to catch the filmmakers off guard.

This unexpected behavior was seen as relevant to the documentary, suggesting that Elizabeth had a particular idea of what was being filmed. The crew responded by setting up cameras in strategic locations around the house, capturing the couple's interactions even when they thought no one was watching.

One notable example is the scene where Billy mentions going to the gym. If viewed without context, it appears as a casual conversation. However, knowing that Elizabeth had previously suggested filming this moment makes it clear that she was trying to shape the narrative of their lives.

This dynamic highlights the challenges faced by the filmmakers in capturing authentic moments. By embracing verité film techniques, they aimed to create an immersive experience for the audience.

In retrospect, the crew's approach may seem novel, but it is actually rooted in traditional documentary filmmaking methods. As Lance Oppenheim notes, the film's unique blend of styles - including reenactments and a director on camera - is not new, but rather a response to the complexities of the subject matter.

The filmmakers were dealing with a real-life human optical illusion, where Elizabeth's behavior was both fascinating and bewildering. This required them to adapt their approach, using a range of techniques to capture the essence of their story.

Nathan Fielder recalls that during filming, there were many moments that didn't immediately make sense. It wasn't until reviewing the footage later that they began to piece together the narrative.

The who's on first scene is a prime example of this process. The crew was present for over a month, and some events may have slipped their minds temporarily. However, upon reviewing the footage, they realized the significance of these seemingly inexplicable moments.

These unusual occurrences sparked intense discussions among the filmmakers, who would often talk about them extensively during editing sessions. Fielder notes that it's challenging to capture authentic moments when you're simply observing and can't influence events.

The crew's response was to lean into these enigmatic scenes, recognizing their value in creating a rich and nuanced portrait of Elizabeth's life.

The documentary's subjects, Billy and Elizabeth, were aware of the crew's presence throughout the filming process.

They knew Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim were there to capture their lives, but they still maintained a sense of control over what was being recorded.

Fielder acknowledges that he initially expressed his own reservations about participating in the project, which added an extra layer of complexity to the dynamic between the crew and the subjects.

The tension was palpable at times, but Fielder emphasizes that the crew never felt pressured or forced into staying when they sensed their presence wasn't welcome.

In fact, Fielder made it clear from the outset that if tensions ran high, the crew would leave without hesitation, respecting the family's boundaries and decision to participate in the documentary.

The subjects' response was firm but polite, with Billy and Elizabeth consistently expressing a desire for the crew to stay and continue filming.

This exchange highlights the intricate dance between the crew and the subjects, where lines were blurred and expectations were constantly shifting.

The crew's willingness to adapt and navigate this unpredictable situation allowed them to capture moments that might have been lost or overlooked in more traditional documentary approaches.

The reactions to You Can See Everything have been varied and often unpredictable, according to Lance Oppenheim.

Seeing the film with audiences is a unique experience for Oppenheim, as it seems to elicit different responses from each viewing. The documentary maker likens this phenomenon to an evolving Rorschach test, where he witnesses a pattern of behavior emerge over time that may not be immediately apparent.

This observation is particularly striking given Oppenheim's previous experiences with documentaries, which often involve spending years with the subjects. In contrast, You Can See Everything" allowed him to witness significant changes in Elizabeth's behavior, making it harder to categorize her actions as conscious or unconscious.

Oppenheim notes that operating within a binary framework can be limiting when dealing with complex issues like those presented in the film. He suggests that human behavior often exists in a gray area between these extremes, where motivations and awareness are intertwined.

Nathan Fielder observes that the current reactions to the documentary have created an interesting dynamic. With so many people viewing the film, he's been able to see different perspectives emerge, which has provided valuable insights into the story.

Fielder also notes that proximity plays a significant role in shaping reactions to the documentary. When working closely with Elizabeth and Billy, it was difficult to separate their perspectives from the objective reality of the situation.

However, now that the film is being viewed by a broader audience, Fielder is seeing people bring their own experiences and biases to the table. This has created a complex tapestry of reactions, making it challenging for him to distinguish between what's on screen and what's coming from individual viewers.

The documentary's focus shifted in the second half, as Oppenheim and his team lost access to Elizabeth but continued to explore her story. They were particularly interested in the business side of things, specifically Billy's efforts to develop a product related to Elizabeth's work.

Oppenheim recounts that they initially thought it would take 365 days for Billy to have something to show them, but it ultimately took two years. During this time, Oppenheim and his team encountered new challenges as they tried to reach out to people outside of the immediate circle around Elizabeth.

Their efforts were hindered by the perception that Elizabeth was a toxic personality, which made some individuals reluctant to participate in the documentary.

The filmmakers were still grappling with the narrative even after assembling the first half of the documentary. They felt that something was missing, despite the dramatic conclusion of Elizabeth's prison sentencing. This sense of incompleteness led them to continue exploring the story.

A crucial turning point came when they reached out to Amanda, who invited them over for an informal conversation, accompanied by cameras.

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/you-can-see-everything-nathan-fielder-lance-oppenheim-1236741967/

The documentary opened to an impressive $15 million over the weekend, a feat rarely seen by nonfiction films even after a full run. Critics are also raving about the film, with a record-setting 99 on Metacritic, 98% on Rotten Tomatoes, and high ratings on Letterboxd and IMDb.

As You Can See Everything gains momentum, some studios are framing the race as an underdog story, pitting it against Christopher Nolan's blockbuster The Odyssey. However, a closer look reveals that this documentary may be more of a worthy opponent than initially thought.

With its impressive box office numbers and critical acclaim, You Can See Everything is certainly a contender to watch in the Best Picture category. But can it actually take down the frontrunner?

Industry insiders are taking notice of the documentary's potential, with some speculating that this could be the year a documentary takes home the top prize at the Oscars. The competition is heating up, and You Can See Everything is definitely one to keep an eye on as the awards season unfolds.

The film's success has also sparked discussions about the merits of documentaries in the Best Picture category, with some arguing that this could be a game-changer for nonfiction films at the Oscars.

The film You Can See Everything is not just vying for recognition in the documentary feature category at the 99th Academy Awards. It's also been submitted across a range of other categories on A24's awards site.

These include best picture, director, production design, cinematography, costume design, film editing, makeup and hairstyling, sound, and original score. The list of nominees for each category is extensive, with multiple individuals contributing to the film in various capacities.

Amanda Seyfried, who plays Elizabeth Holmes in the film, has been confirmed as eligible for acting consideration at the Oscars. She will be campaigned in the supporting actress category, a move that could potentially earn her a second nomination.

Seyfried's eligibility is significant, given her previous win for playing Holmes in The Dropout." Her role in "You Can See Everything sees her reprising the same character, but this time as herself, adding an extra layer of complexity to her performance.

A documentary has never cracked the best picture nomination at the Oscars, despite being a staple of awards season for nearly a century. However, this year's crop is shaping up to be different.

Lionsgate's Michael Jackson biopic has been denied its request to compete as a comedy or musical at the Golden Globes. As a result, the film will now vie for one of the six available drama slots against stiff competition from Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey and other contenders. The Golden Globes' decision does not impact the supporting actor and actress categories.

The Governors Awards are just around the corner, with Glenn Close and Ridley Scott set to receive honorary Oscars on November 15. Meanwhile, preliminary voting for the Oscars shortlist in 12 categories is scheduled to take place from December 7-11. The announcement of the shortlist will follow shortly after on December 15.

Following the close of the eligibility period on December 31, 2026, nominations voting will run from January 11-15, 2027. The official Oscar nominations will then be announced on Thursday, January 21, 2027.

The latest predictions for the upcoming Oscars nominations have been released, and several films are expected to lead the pack.

At the top of the list is The Odyssey, projected to receive 15 nominations, closely followed by Dune: Part Three" with 11 nods, and "La Bola Negra with 10. Rounding out the top five are Project Hail Mary with eight nominations and The Invite" with six.

In terms of studios, A24 is expected to dominate, with 17 projected nominations, followed closely by Universal Pictures with 15, Netflix with 13, Warner Bros. with 12, and Amazon MGM Studios and Searchlight Pictures tied for fifth place with eight each.

These predictions will ultimately influence the official Oscar nominations, which will be announced on Thursday, January 21, 2027, marking the culmination of the awards season.

Variety: https://variety.com/lists/2027-oscars-predictions/

Pattinson initially joined the project as a producer but eventually agreed to play the To Catch a Predator host after receiving a special delivery of 200 Zyn canisters at his Los Angeles home. The nicotine pouch brand was reportedly a personal weakness for Pattinson at the time, and Oppenheim seized this opportunity to his advantage.

The filmmaker had been aware that there was a shortage of Zyn in the US market, which made it even more appealing to send a large quantity to Pattinson's doorstep. This calculated move was part of a larger strategy to win over the actor, who has now taken on the lead role in 'Primetime'.

Following this unusual gesture, Oppenheim also handed over the latest version of the script with a letter addressed to "Chris Han-Zyn, further highlighting his creative approach to casting and collaboration.

The casting process for Lance Oppenheim's film Primetime was a unique one. According to director Oppenheim, getting Robert Pattinson on board was akin to a high-profile sports announcement - it was a significant move that generated excitement.

Screenwriter Ajon Singh had been struggling to get anyone in Hollywood to read his initial script, but things took a turn when the actor got hold of it and expressed interest. A Zoom call with Pattinson and his producing partner Brighton McCloskey followed, where they discussed the project specifically.

The film chronicles the making of To Catch a Predator, which ran from 2004 to 2007. When Oppenheim came on board as director, he and Singh worked together to revamp the character of Hansen in an effort to win Pattinson over for the lead role.

The casting process for 'Primetime' was marked by an unconventional approach. Robert Pattinson was reportedly drawn to the film after watching numerous episodes of Chris Hansen's podcast and interviews. He became intrigued by the character's concept, which was inspired by the public persona of Hansen.

Pattinson had a clear understanding of what he would be portraying in the movie - a reimagined version of Hansen's public image across various mediums and internet culture. This conceptual figure was described as an egregore," a term used to describe a thought form or public persona that takes on a life of its own.

Pattinson's interest in the project ultimately led him to accept the lead role, marking a significant development in the film's production.

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/lance-oppenheim-bribed-robert-pattinson-zyn-star-primetime-1236736866/

Audiences are still reeling from the shocking revelations presented in the documentary, with many taking to social media to share their reactions and discuss the content with friends. Some have even expressed frustration at those who haven't yet seen the film.

Despite the intense interest in You Can See Everything, there is still much that remains unclear about the making of the documentary. Filmmaker Nathan Fielder has himself admitted to struggling to understand the events that unfolded during its production.

Fielder's collaborator, Lance Oppenheim, was also involved in the project, and the two filmmakers reportedly disagreed on various aspects of the film. This tension is reflected in the finished product.

As viewers continue to process what they've seen, many are left with unanswered questions about the documentary's central figures and their motivations. Holmes' decision to participate in the film has been particularly scrutinized.

The road to creating You Can See Everything" began when A24 met with Elizabeth Holmes after she expressed a desire for exposure. This marked the first step towards what would become a complex and intriguing project.

As the project seemed dead, Evans' intention behind the film parties was revealed in a recent interview. He stated that his goal was for people to see who she is, implying a desire to humanize her character.

However, the agreement between the parties couldn't be reached, and it appeared that the project had stalled. This period of uncertainty was followed by an unexpected encounter between Oppenheim and Fielder at the Magic Castle in LA.

During an improv performance, someone from the audience shouted out Holmes' name. After the show, Oppenheim turned to Fielder and mentioned the incident, which seemed to spark a new interest in pursuing the project.

Fielder promptly called A24's offices in New York, and he and Oppenheim began exploring the possibility of developing the film further. Their initial skepticism about the project's viability had given way to curiosity.

A key figure in the early stages of the project was Emily Osborne, who helped guide it as part of her role at A24. However, she is no longer with the company after being laid off last year when the studio shelved its documentary division.

Despite her departure, Osborne remains an executive producer on the film, a testament to the enduring legacy of her contributions to the project.

The alleged incident of rape at Stanford in 2003 has been cited as a turning point in Elizabeth Holmes' life.

This traumatic event supposedly led her to become increasingly focused on her work and entrepreneurial pursuits, which eventually culminated in the creation of Theranos and her decision to drop out of college.

Public records obtained through a California Public Records request reveal that the Santa Clara County sheriff's office was indeed notified about a reported on-campus sexual assault involving Holmes at a frat house on October 1, 2003.

Deputies were dispatched to investigate, but the outcome of their inquiry is unclear.

Holmes has also made allegations against Sunny Balwani, her former boyfriend and Theranos COO, who was convicted of fraud and is currently serving time in prison.

Balwani has denied these claims, leaving it up to interpretation whether they provide context for Holmes' behavior.

The contrast between Holmes' situation and that of Billy Evans, a character in the film, is striking given the lack of information about his background and motivations.

The Bahia Resort Hotel, one of the properties owned by the Evans Hotel Group, has been at the center of controversy in Southern California. Local citizens' organizations have accused the hotel's owners of taking away public access to Mission Bay as a result of an expansion project.

This issue is particularly relevant when considering the idyllic beach setting depicted in the film, where Evans and Holmes are shown enjoying a carefree day together at their Del Mar rental. The juxtaposition of this serene atmosphere with the real-life disputes over land use and public access adds a layer of complexity to the story.

The Evans Hotel Group has also been involved in a lawsuit against local unions that were attempting to block the hotel's expansion. Although the suit was ultimately dismissed, it highlights the family's history of controversy and conflict with various stakeholders.

In recent years, Billy Evans has transitioned into a new career path, founding a biotech company called Haemanthus. The company is working on blood-testing technology using Raman spectroscopy, but its patent portfolio appears limited to just one invention.

The fact that Haemanthus was founded by the same person who previously ran afoul of local unions and environmental groups raises questions about the potential risks associated with this new venture. As with any biotech startup, there are inherent challenges involved in developing and implementing medical technologies.

Amanda Seyfried's portrayal of Holmes in the film is based on real-life events, including her first meeting with Fielder. According to reports, Seyfried was brought in initially for a single scene, but her involvement quickly expanded as the filmmakers realized her potential value to the project.

The decision to have Seyfried react to and discuss the arguments being presented by Fielder turned out to be an unexpected rehearsal for the eventual film's third act. This serendipitous turn of events highlights the unpredictable nature of creative processes in filmmaking and the ways in which actors can contribute to the development of a story.

Upstate New York serves as the home to an animal rescue founded by actress Shailene Woodley and her partner Thomas Sadoski. This 501(c)(3) nonprofit provides a safe haven for elderly or endangered animals such as ducks, goats, donkeys, cats, chickens, and horses.

Woodley and Sadoski have personally funded the operation of this rescue, opting not to accept donations. However, Woodley has been involved with at least one public-facing animal rights organization, Best Friends Society, which focuses on anti-kill shelters.

The couple's decision to found an animal rescue reflects their commitment to providing a safe environment for animals in need. This endeavor also underscores the significance of individuals taking initiative in addressing social and environmental issues.

In a separate development, Woodley and Sadoski announced that they would be separating after footage for the film was shot. The timing of this announcement is noteworthy, given the circumstances surrounding their involvement with the project.

The film's distributor, A24, has become known for its ability to craft memorable memes from its productions. Hereditary and Uncut Gems have both spawned numerous memes, often juxtaposing the films' themes with everyday items like Costco hot dogs.

A24 appears to believe that it has another hit meme on its hands, this time featuring a close-up two-shot of characters played by Fielder and Holmes on the couch. The company's confidence in this image is not unfounded, given its widespread repurposing prior to the film's release.

The upcoming film will likely be subject to further scrutiny as it explores themes that are both mundane and revealing. One such theme is the art of whisking eggs, which the character played by Evans will attempt to teach Holmes. This scene has the potential to spawn additional memes, particularly in the context of Saturday Night Live sketches and Oscar ceremony bits.

The women's prison where Elizabeth Holmes is currently being held has become a hub of high-profile inmates, including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jen Shah. This unusual collection of celebrities-turned-prisoners raises questions about the facility's security level and treatment of its inhabitants.

As a low-security facility, the prison holds individuals with shorter sentences, typically less than five years. The relatively small staff is another distinguishing feature, as the inmates are not considered violent risks. This unique setup has led to some unusual living arrangements for both prisoners and neighbors.

Visitation rules allow family members and approved visitors to see Holmes every Saturday and/or Sunday. Neighbors have described the prison grounds as tranquil, with singing mockingbirds and craftsman-style homes surrounding the facility. The overall atmosphere is surprisingly park-like, given its purpose as a correctional institution.

A judge's decision earlier this year allowed Holmes to be released four years early from her 2034 sentence. This ruling was based on her not causing substantial financial hardship to victims. However, a Theranos investor who was defrauded by Holmes has received word from the Justice Department that she is actually being transferred to a halfway house in Austin.

This transfer, which will take place this summer, may give Holmes and her husband just enough time to plan a sequel to their story for 2028, providing a sense of closure on a saga that has captivated audiences worldwide.

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/you-can-see-everything-key-points-1236735112/

This figure puts it second only to another documentary's record-breaking opening weekend. Despite being screened in a relatively limited number of theaters - 855 this weekend - the movie is drawing massive crowds. In fact, there were reportedly over 2,000 sold-out screenings across the country.

The film has been getting rave reviews from critics, with an impressive 99% score on both Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic. This is not surprising given its fascinating subject matter: Holmes' meteoric rise as the founder of Theranos, her subsequent downfall, and her eventual sentencing to 11 years in prison for defrauding investors.

The documentary's unique access to Holmes and her family adds an extra layer of intrigue. Just a month before she began serving her sentence, the filmmakers were given extensive behind-the-scenes access to the Holmes household. This was made all the more interesting by the involvement of Nathan Fielder, creator of The Rehearsal, who co-directed the film alongside Lance Oppenheim.

It's not hard to see why tickets for You Can See Everything are proving so elusive - at least in major cities like Manhattan. I can attest to the difficulty of finding a screening with available seats that aren't in the front row, after spending several hours searching yesterday.

The documentary You Can See Everything is generating significant buzz, and its premiere seems to have been a closely watched event. TechCrunch's Amanda Silberling was among those who got an early look at the film on Thursday. According to her report, the enigmatic Elizabeth Holmes has finally found a match in Fielder, a comedian known for his deadpan style.

Fielder's month-long stint with Holmes is just the beginning of what promises to be a surreal and metatextual journey. The documentary's unusual premise may be contributing to the intense interest surrounding it. This attention could be having an impact on other tech-centric films trying to break through in the market.

Recent box office numbers suggest that You Can See Everything is not alone in generating significant buzz. Aaron Sorkin's follow-up to The Social Network", titled "The Social Reckoning, opened to a disappointing $5.5 million last weekend and has since fallen out of the top 10. Another documentary, Alex Gibney's four-hour film about Elon Musk, managed only $306,702 at the box office this past weekend.

This intense interest in Holmes' story may be making it harder for other films to gain traction. The market is filled with stories about influential figures and their rise to power, but You Can See Everything" seems to be capturing a significant share of attention. The documentary's unique blend of mystery and intrigue is likely contributing to its appeal.

The week's news cycle has been filled with a mix of innovation and setbacks for various tech startups.

In one notable development, Tesla made headlines by unveiling its SpaceX-powered Roadster, which boasts flying capabilities in addition to its high-performance features. The vehicle is designed to showcase the company's ambitious goals in electric transportation. This latest reveal from Elon Musk's team continues to generate buzz around the brand's cutting-edge technology.

Several major deals have also been announced recently, with Bumble agreeing to a $1.3 billion acquisition deal as the online dating industry undergoes significant changes. Just five years after its launch, Character.AI has filed for bankruptcy despite being an interactive chatbot platform. This contrast between success and failure highlights the challenges faced by startups in the ever-evolving tech landscape.

Meta's release of its first frontier model, Muse, marks another milestone in AI research, demonstrating the company's commitment to pushing boundaries in this field.

TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/18/everyones-watching-the-elizabeth-holmes-documentary-you-can-see-everything/

Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim's documentary You Can See Everything, which profiles Elizabeth Holmes, has already generated buzz among film enthusiasts following its earlier critical acclaim.

The release coincides with other high-profile documentaries that have recently debuted in theaters, including Mus k, The Social Reckoning, and Artificial, all of which share a common theme of challenging the dominant figures shaping our digital lives.

These films present an alternative perspective on the tech industry's impact, offering a critique of its influence over society and individual lives.

As such, they can be seen as a form of collective pushback against the tech elite, who often present their solutions to perceived problems with a sense of infallibility.

The filmmakers behind these movies are choosing to center figures from Silicon Valley, but it's not just about who they're featuring - it's also about how they're portraying them. This is evident in the meticulous way Musk's character is deconstructed in You Can See Everything.

In Reckoning, Meta is depicted as exploiting people's emotions and divisions for financial gain. The film takes a critical look at the ways in which social media platforms like Meta can manipulate users. By highlighting this aspect, the filmmakers are bringing attention to the potential consequences of unchecked power.

Luca Guadagnino's Artificial is another example of how these movies are taking on Silicon Valley figures. This drama follows Sam Altman's rise to prominence at OpenAI and critiques his business practices. The film shows how Altman convinced investors and employees that his goals were aligned with human values, only to reveal a more cynical reality.

The portrayal of Ilya Sutskever in Artificial is particularly noteworthy. As an engineering prodigy who joined OpenAI and enabled the company's breakthroughs, he was initially assured by Altman that their work would be done responsibly and with humanity at its core. However, it seems this promise turned out to be false.

The recent trend of films tackling big tech's influence has sparked a mix of emotions among audiences. Some may feel frustrated by the portrayal of safety concerns being ignored in favor of rapid growth and innovation.

However, it's also heartening to see these issues being brought to light, despite initial promises of silence or suppression. This representation is itself a testament to the power of storytelling and its ability to amplify marginalized voices.

Companies like SpaceX are increasingly relying on consumer adoption to drive their financial success. As Elon Musk's ventures continue to expand, so too does his influence over global events, as seen in real-time during the Ukraine-Russia conflict.

In this context, films like Gibney's seem less about winning a war and more about exposing the underlying dynamics at play.

Altman's reaction to the film's portrayal was telling, suggesting that he feared being accurately depicted on screen.

The release of "You Can See Everything is just one part of a larger meta-drama unfolding between artists and Silicon Valley tech leaders.

Tech executives had long believed that large language models (LLMs) would render professional writing skills obsolete.

However, the emergence of films like You Can See Everything indicates that this may not be the case, as writers and creators push back against the notion that AI will replace human storytellers.

As the filmmakers behind You Can See Everything push back against the notion that AI will replace human storytellers, it's clear they're not alone in their sentiment.

Their counterparts in other projects are singing a similar tune, highlighting the limitations of relying on machines to create content. The people involved in these narratives seem to be united in their assertion that much of what they do cannot be outsourced to an algorithm.

The emergence of these films suggests that Hollywood studios are taking notice and are now positioning themselves as champions of human creativity. This is a significant shift, especially considering the industry's history.

Amazon's decision to drop Artificial was meant to silence dissenting voices, but it ultimately had the opposite effect, sidelining itself instead.

The recent surge of films tackling anti-oligarchal themes and critiquing big tech has sparked a long-overdue reckoning in Hollywood. These movies are not just entertaining tales, but also serve as a form of social commentary that challenges the status quo.

As Elon Musk himself noted, these films have the potential to course through the collective blood" and change societal views, settling a deep-seated grudge against big tech's dominance. This is evident in the success of films like 'Street Fighter', which is poised for box office victory, and the Elizabeth Holmes biopic, which is set for a strong launch.

The Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/you-can-see-everything-fielder-holmes-themes-showtimes-1236734072/