According to preliminary data, Netanyahu's Likud party is leading the polls with its far-right and ultra-Orthodox Jewish allies expected to secure 53 seats in the 120-seat Knesset. However, this number falls short of a majority, leaving Netanyahu struggling to form a governing coalition. The electoral landscape remains fluid as votes from soldiers and diplomats are yet to be counted.

In stark contrast, Eisenkot's Yashar party and three other Jewish opposition parties are on course for 48 seats. Both leaders have expressed their intention to form a government despite the uncertain outcome of the election. With no clear winner in sight, it is unclear which coalition will eventually emerge victorious.

Arab-led parties are set to make significant gains with an unprecedented 19 seats up for grabs. This could potentially give them leverage as kingmakers in the post-election power struggle. However, all but one Jewish party have ruled out collaborating with Arab-led factions, leaving open the possibility of a minority government or another election.

As the electoral process continues, President Isaac Herzog will hold consultations with all parties to determine which leader has the best chance of forming a stable government. This could take weeks, and if no solution is found, another election may be necessary to break the deadlock.

The turnout in Israel's election was an impressive 77.7%, the highest in over two decades, according to initial reports. This significant participation is being hailed as a testament to the country's strong democratic spirit.

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid has already begun preparing for potential coalition talks after Tuesday's vote. He plans to meet with various factions next week once official results are announced.

With both Netanyahu and Eisenkot insisting on forming a governing coalition, it remains unclear which path forward will be chosen. Both leaders have expressed confidence in their respective blocs' ability to secure a majority.

As the situation unfolds, Israel's politicians are navigating complex negotiations to prevent a repeat of last year's election stalemate.

The Likud party's headquarters in Jerusalem was abuzz with activity as Benjamin Netanyahu declared his right-wing bloc had secured a "great majority in the election results so far.

Netanyahu emphasized that a strong national government with a clear majority is essential to prevent any potential threats to Israel's security and stability. He underscored that forming a coalition reliant on Arab parties would be catastrophic, stating it was forbidden" to put Israel at risk in such a manner.

Meanwhile, the leader of the left-wing Democrats party has reached out to its partners in Eisenkot's bloc with an offer to form a new government in partnership with the Arab parties. This move aims to unseat Netanyahu's coalition and bring about change, according to Yair Golan, who emphasized that this opportunity should not be missed.

The strong turnout among Arab Israelis is likely to result in record representation for the two major Arab parties - the United Arab List and the Joint List. These parties often describe themselves as Palestinian citizens of Israel, making up around a fifth of the population.

The chairman of the Joint List has stated that his party is ready to play a crucial role in paving the way for the ousting of Netanyahu's government through a genuine Jewish-Arab partnership. Yousef Jabareen emphasized that such a partnership must be equal and not compromise on the principles of democracy and equality.

Partial results from Tuesday's Israeli election indicate that Prime Minister Netanyahu's bloc is in the lead but still short of a majority in the 120-seat Knesset.

The outcome has sparked hopes among Arab parties that they could hold significant sway over the balance of power in the new government, with United Arab List leader Mansour Abbas expressing optimism about the prospects for a governing coalition. Abbas and his party have been key players in previous negotiations and are seen as crucial to securing a majority.

The election was closely watched due to its potential impact on Israel's future trajectory, particularly regarding the country's hardline stance on regional conflicts.

Key issues that emerged during the campaign included accountability for security failures, conscription of ultra-Orthodox Jewish men into the military, judicial reforms and Israel's international standing - all highly contentious topics that could shape the nation's course.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmdx3knq1xexo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

With nearly 85% of votes counted from Tuesday's poll, it seems unlikely that either side will have enough seats to form a government without seeking an alliance with other parties. This has led to speculation about the possible outcomes, including the possibility of fresh elections being called.

Netanyahu may try to break the impasse by forming a national unity government with his rival Gadi Eisenkot's party, but this would require Eisenkot to abandon one of his key campaign promises - ousting Netanyahu from power. Eisenkot has framed himself as the only viable alternative to Netanyahu and built his entire campaign around removing him from office.

Eisenkot's party, Yashar, had been gaining ground in the polls until a revision of exit poll results saw Netanyahu take the lead. In a speech at his campaign headquarters last night, Eisenkot called on Netanyahu to step down from politics entirely, citing concerns about the prime minister's "culture of lies" and divisive rhetoric.

Netanyahu has so far shown little indication that he is willing to form a unity government with Eisenkot, despite the need for an alliance to secure a majority in parliament. Last night at Likud headquarters, Netanyahu expressed gratitude to his coalition partners and called for a strong right-wing government - comments that suggest he intends to maintain his existing alliances rather than seek out new ones.

A renewed conflict with Iran could be a game-changer in Israeli politics, potentially forcing party leaders to put aside their differences and form a unity government.

Netanyahu's push for fresh strikes on Iran has been reported by both Israeli and US media, with some suggesting he sought approval from Donald Trump for US involvement. Critics would likely frame this as an attempt by Netanyahu to save his own skin through another regional conflict. This move could have far-reaching implications for the country's politics.

If a unity government were formed, it would be a significant shift in Israeli politics. Historically, Arab parties have been excluded from coalitions, with only one independent party joining a coalition in 2021 - a brief and unsuccessful tenure. The opposition is now considering an unlikely alliance with Arab parties to secure a majority.

The Arab parties emerged as surprise winners on election night, defying expectations and potentially gaining a record 19 seats. This was largely due to high voter turnout among Israel's Arab population, who make up around one-fifth of the country and often identify as Palestinian citizens of Israel.

The high voter turnout among Israel's Arab population has led to a significant shift in the country's election landscape. This increase in participation was largely driven by a desire to oust the most right-wing governing coalition in Israel's history.

Several Arab-led parties have made significant gains in the election, with The United Arab list projected to win around 7 seats and The Joint List on track to secure 12 seats. These parties have indicated that they would join or support an opposition government if given the opportunity.

The scenario of a Jewish-Arab coalition has gained some traction, but it remains fragile and faces significant challenges, particularly when it comes to issues like Gaza and the occupied West Bank. Yair Golan, a leader from The Democrats, is one of the few Jewish politicians advocating for this approach.

Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Lieberman are two right-wing leaders who could potentially break away from their current blocs and join Netanyahu's coalition. Both men share hardline views on security with Netanyahu and have expressed willingness to form a government with him, despite being part of Eisenkot's bloc.

The opposition's efforts to unseat Netanyahu have created a complex web of alliances and rivalries that make it difficult for any single grouping to form a majority government.

Bennett and Lieberman's parties are now seen as potential replacements for the ultra-Orthodox parties currently aligned with Netanyahu, but electoral math suggests this alternative might not have sufficient seats to secure a majority.

This scenario raises questions about whether Bennett and Lieberman would be willing to join forces with Netanyahu despite their past conflicts over issues like military conscription for the ultra-Orthodox community.

The current stalemate has led some analysts to predict that new elections may become the default outcome, allowing Netanyahu to remain as caretaker prime minister until a fresh poll can take place.

As negotiations between Netanyahu's Likud party and its rivals continue to stall, Israel faces a precarious situation where new elections may become inevitable. The country has already held five separate polls since 2019, with each attempt at forming a government ending in stalemate.

With the current deadlock showing no signs of resolution, analysts warn that fresh elections could be the only way forward, allowing Netanyahu to remain as caretaker prime minister until a new poll can take place and a viable coalition is formed.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm62y46d97wwo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

This historic number breaks records set back in 1999 and is likely to have significant implications for the Israeli parliamentary election. The Joint List and Ra'am, two leading Arab-led parties, are projected to hold a record number of seats in the 120-member Knesset.

According to exit polling data from Tuesday's vote, these parties are set to win 18 seats between them. This would mark a significant increase for Arab representation in the Israeli parliament.

The opposition bloc led by former military chief Gadi Eisenkot and the bloc led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud party were tied at 51 seats each according to updated exit polling data.

Historic voting numbers among Palestinian citizens of Israel have been driven by increased mobilization and engagement, with many seeing this election as a crucial opportunity for their voices to be heard in Israeli politics.

With historic voting numbers among Palestinian citizens of Israel driving the election, parties are now facing the challenge of forming a government that can command majority support in the Israeli parliament.

Former Israeli ambassador Alon Pinkas warns that creating such a government may be difficult for parties like Eisenkot's, which had initially promised not to form coalitions with Arab parties during the campaign. According to Pinkas, this stance is problematic because it implies that Arab parties will only be considered when their votes are needed, rather than being part of the coalition from the start.

This approach raises concerns about the marginalization of Arab parties and their constituents, who make up a significant portion of Israel's population. As Pinkas notes, there is a "price to pay for this kind of exclusionary politics, which can have far-reaching consequences for governance in Israel.

In a last-ditch effort to influence voter turnout, Netanyahu's Likud party launched a campaign warning supporters about the supposedly surging participation of Palestinian citizens of Israel. This move was met with widespread criticism from Arab politicians, who accused the prime minister of resorting to racist and inflammatory tactics.

Cars bearing Netanyahu's party flags were spotted driving through Jerusalem, blaring the Islamic call to prayer as they urged supporters to cast their ballots because Arabs are voting.

A record-breaking voter turnout was reported by the Central Elections Committee, with an impressive 77.7 percent casting their ballots in Tuesday's election, marking the highest level since 1999.

The significant increase in participation among Palestinian citizens of Israel is particularly noteworthy, as they make up approximately 21 percent of the country's population of 10 million and have historically voted at lower rates than Jewish Israelis.

This surge in voter engagement has been described by Al Jazeera's Nour Odeh as an existential moment" for Palestinian-Israelis, with even those who typically boycott elections feeling motivated to participate due to hopes that their votes could bring about meaningful change.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/28/arab-parties-could-win-18-seats-in-israeli-elections-exit-polls-suggest?traffic_source=rss

The operation, which began on Friday after two soldiers were killed in a shooting near the city, has seen the Israeli army impose a lockdown across Hebron and detain at least 71 people over the past four days. The Palestinian Prisoner's Society reported this significant number of detentions.

Hebron Governor Khaled Dudin has confirmed that a total of 488 families, comprising 3,171 people, have been displaced across the wider governorate. Mayor Yousef al-Jabari added that 3,043 of those forced from their homes are residents within Hebron city limits alone.

The Israeli military's campaign against the Palestinian population in Hebron has involved the demolition of residential buildings, factories, and roads, as well as blocking roads, raiding homes, and assaulting Palestinians. This crackdown is part of a broader trend of increased tensions across the occupied West Bank.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has justified this operation by promising an action "unseen since the 1967 war, which suggests that his government intends to take even more extreme measures against Palestinian residents in Hebron and other areas of the occupied territory.

The displacement of Palestinians in Hebron has taken on a complex form, according to local authorities. The majority of those forcibly removed from their homes are women, children, and elderly individuals, who have been left without stable living arrangements.

In some cases, the homes of uprooted families have been converted into military facilities by Israeli soldiers. This includes barracks for troops and interrogation centres where Palestinians are detained and questioned. The use of private residences as military outposts is a common practice in areas under occupation.

A professor at al-Quds Open University has shed light on the various methods employed to displace Palestinian residents. Noman Amr explained that there are three primary categories: homes evacuated for demolition, collective punishment, or military purposes. Some properties have been transformed into barracks and field interrogation centres, further complicating the situation.

The psychological impact of these actions should not be underestimated, according to Amr. Displaced residents have reported hearing soldiers make comments designed to instil fear and panic. The goal is to create a state of instability within Palestinian society, making it more susceptible to Israeli control.

Israeli officials have explicitly linked the Hebron operation to previous campaigns in the occupied West Bank. They aim to impose a new reality, where Israel has greater control over land and resources, at the expense of the local population.

The Israeli military's actions in the occupied West Bank have drawn comparisons with a devastating operation in 2025 in the Jenin, Nur Shams and Tulkarem refugee camps. The Iron Wall operation resulted in significant loss of life, with at least 102 people killed, and widespread destruction of residential buildings, leaving over half of them uninhabitable.

The tactics employed by Israeli forces during this operation have been likened to those used in Gaza, where a three-year conflict has claimed more than 74,000 lives and left the territory severely damaged. The scale of destruction in Jenin was so severe that it made the camp nearly uninhabitable, according to UNRWA.

A recent report by the United Nations Human Rights Office (OHCHR) highlighted concerns about collective punishment and ethnic cleansing following Israeli military actions at the three camps. Displaced Palestinians reported being told by Israeli officers that they would be forced to leave the area and relocate to Jordan, raising questions about the long-term impact of these operations.

Israeli forces have also been accused of targeting civilians during these operations, including children. At least 21 minors were killed in the Iron Wall" operation, including a 10-year-old boy who was shot while waiting for his father and a two-year-old girl who died while having dinner with her family.

The systematic destruction of infrastructure during the Hebron operation has been seen as an attempt to make displacement permanent. Analysts have pointed out that this approach is consistent with Israeli forces' tactics in other areas, including Gaza, where vital infrastructure has also been targeted and destroyed.

The Israeli military's targeting of water wells in the occupied West Bank is not just about destroying infrastructure, but also has a profound impact on the daily lives of Palestinians. By crippling their access to clean drinking water, the occupation forces are effectively undermining the stability and continuity of Palestinian communities.

According to local analysts, there is a disturbing trend emerging in Hebron, where armed settler groups have formed militias with heavy weaponry and vehicles, often wearing Israeli army uniforms. This collaboration between settlers and soldiers has enabled them to carry out violent attacks on Palestinian residents, including released prisoners and commercial interests.

The ground-level violence in Hebron is complemented by administrative land grabs, as the Israeli military establishes new barriers across the city, effectively severing Palestinian communities from their lands. The Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission notes that these barriers are part of a broader network designed to expand control over areas separating settlements and besiege Palestinian expansions.

This strategy of control is not limited to Hebron alone; it is a tactic employed by Israeli forces in other areas as well, including Gaza, where vital infrastructure has been targeted and destroyed. The impact on Palestinian lives is far-reaching, with communities struggling to access basic necessities like water, food, and healthcare.

As Israel's parliamentary election approaches, the military has announced plans to bar Palestinian workers from entering most areas of the West Bank through Monday, and impose a full closure of crossings into and out of the territory on Tuesday. This move will further exacerbate the humanitarian crisis in the region, as Palestinians face increased restrictions on their movement and access to essential services.

The Israeli government's decision to expand expulsions in the occupied West Bank is widely seen as a cynical ploy to secure votes from hard-right supporters. Mayor al-Jabari has accused Prime Minister Netanyahu of using the military operation for electoral gain.

A similar sentiment was echoed by Amr, who suggested that Palestinians are being made to pay the price for Netanyahu's re-election efforts. He pointed out that the Israeli government is attempting to erase Palestinian history, with some even proposing a "correction" of past events, including the 1948 Nakba.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/26/israel-expands-occupied-west-bank-expulsions-to-cement-control?traffic_source=rss

Suwayda, a southern governorate of Syria, has been at the center of controversy due to its unique demographic makeup - it is predominantly inhabited by Druze people. The Syrian government does not have full control over this area, making it one of the few remaining pockets of resistance.

Barrack's recent conversation with an influential social media personality touched on Suwayda and a prominent local figure, widely believed to be Hikmat al-Hijri, who holds significant influence in the region as both a politician and a spiritual leader.

The US has been gradually rebuilding its relationship with the new Syrian government since President Bashar al-Assad's ousting in December 2024.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's views on the Syrian government differ significantly from those of his predecessors, particularly given the strong support he received from the US for his military actions in Lebanon, Palestine, and Iran.

Following the collapse of Assad's government, Israel launched a military invasion into Syria, seizing territory in Quneitra governorate and other strategic areas, including some that are crucial to the country's infrastructure.

Israel has continued to challenge President al-Sharaa's administration in Damascus through aggressive actions such as bombing the Ministry of Defence and harassing Syrian citizens in southern regions. These incursions have sparked outrage from Syrian officials who view them as a blatant disregard for their sovereignty.

Barrack, known for his direct approach to diplomacy, engaged with influential social media personality Mario Nawfal on Friday to discuss the situation in southern Syria, hinting that Washington prefers Damascus's control over Suwayda rather than an Israel-aligned group.

The situation in Suwayda remains volatile as Washington's stance on Damascus's control of the region becomes increasingly clear.

Syrian analyst Nanar Hawach noted that US remarks have exposed differences with Israel's approach to Syria, suggesting a divergence in their strategies for the country.

Suwayda residents had initially risen up against the al-Assad regime in 2023 due to worsening living conditions, but their protests continued until the regime collapsed in December 2024.

The collapse of the Baathist rule was met with both celebration and hesitation from Suwayda's Druze majority, who were wary of endorsing the new government.

Tensions escalated in July 2025 when fighting broke out between Bedouin tribes and Druze in Suwayda, resulting in sectarian killings and forcing the Druze to bear the brunt of casualties.

The involvement of forces linked to the government on the side of the Bedouins further complicated the situation, leading analysts like Hawach to speculate about Israel's intentions in the region.

The dynamics in Suwayda are complex, with Sheikh al-Hijri's leadership facing both support and skepticism from within the Druze community.

His authority tends to rise when the community feels threatened, but wanes as tensions ease, creating a delicate balance of power that is exploited by Damascus. The Syrian government's efforts to exert control over Suwayda are met with resistance from local leaders who seek greater autonomy.

In July 2025, violence broke out in Suwayda, prompting the US to initiate talks with the Syrian government in Jordan. A trilateral agreement was reached in Amman in September of that year, which called for an independent investigation into the events and the prosecution of those responsible.

However, despite this agreement, the situation in Suwayda remains unresolved, with many residents lacking trust in the government. The distrust is fueled by Damascus's heavy-handed approach to restoring control over the province.

The Syrian government's tactics have focused on pressuring local leaders, which has had a direct impact on residents' daily lives, from their salaries and children's education to access to basic services like transportation to the capital.

For Suwayda's residents to regain confidence in the Syrian government, accountability is a crucial step towards reconciliation.

Analysts emphasize that credible accountability for past events would be essential in rebuilding trust among the Druze population, who have been affected by the Syrian government's tactics and policies. According to Saban, "a durable settlement needs credible accountability for what happened" in 2025. This includes guarantees for protection of movement, education, and security, which are currently being compromised.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/26/suwayda-remains-in-deadlock-as-us-signals-differences-with-israel-on-syria?traffic_source=rss

This decision is part of a broader crackdown in the occupied West Bank following an attack by Palestinian gunmen that left two Israeli soldiers dead and three others injured. The Israel Defense Forces have implemented a ban on the entry and exit of Palestinian workers throughout Judea and Samaria, as well as the Jordan Valley, including industrial zones.

The restrictions are expected to significantly impact the daily lives of thousands of Palestinian workers who had previously been permitted to enter Israel for work. Before the October 7 attack, more than 100,000 Palestinian workers held permits to enter Israel; however, only a small fraction have had their permits reinstated since then.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has announced a major operation in response to the killing of two Israeli soldiers, which he described as a significant escalation in violence. The military's decision to close West Bank crossings and bar Palestinian workers from entering settlements is part of this broader effort to tighten security measures in the region.

The Israeli military has been intensifying its presence in Hebron, a city in the West Bank, by demolishing homes and businesses, displacing hundreds of families. According to Defence Minister Israel Katz, approximately 2,000 residents have been affected by this operation, which has led to significant damage to infrastructure. Footage shared online shows that at least one entire street appears to be flattened as a result of the demolition.

The city's residents are already facing severe restrictions on their movement, with Israeli forces having cordoned off Hebron and limiting the freedom of its 200,000 inhabitants. This is part of a broader effort by the military to control the flow of people in and out of the region. The entry and exit bans announced by the IDF on Sunday have further exacerbated this situation.

The Israeli military's actions are not unusual, as it has long been a practice for them to demolish homes belonging to Palestinians suspected of carrying out attacks against Israelis. However, human rights groups have criticized this approach as an example of collective punishment. This tactic is seen as disproportionate and inhumane by many observers.

Hebron Mayor Youssef al-Jaabari believes that the operation is being driven by electoral considerations, with Prime Minister Netanyahu attempting to secure votes from the far right and settlers ahead of Israel's election on Tuesday.

Thousands gathered in Tel Aviv on Saturday for a massive anti-government protest, organized by the October Council, a group formed by families affected by the 2023 Hamas-led attack.

The October Council, which has been pushing for accountability and truth, announced that it would hold its "culminating event" three days before the election to mark three years of struggle. This rally saw participation from leaders of the four main opposition parties, including Gadi Eisenkot, a former military chief of staff who is currently in a tight race with Prime Minister Netanyahu.

The protest and the growing presence of the October Council indicate that the Israeli public is increasingly dissatisfied with the government's handling of security issues.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6y93ylpl5p2o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The destruction caused by Israeli bulldozers has been documented online, with one entire street appearing to be flattened under the weight of the machinery. The military has also imposed strict curbs on movement within the city, severely limiting the freedom of its 200,000 residents. Footage shared online shows the extent of the devastation.

The operation was announced by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in response to a deadly attack on an Israeli checkpoint that left two soldiers dead and three others injured. The attackers were also killed in the assault. According to Netanyahu, buildings surrounding the site of the attack and those linked to the perpetrators would be targeted for demolition.

The Mayor of Hebron, Youssef al-Jaabari, has reported that over 1,000 people have been displaced by the operation, which focused on the Ein Deir Baha and Farsh al-Hawa neighbourhoods. The mayor stated that dozens of families were forced to spend the night outside after being told to leave their homes, some without even being able to take their vehicles with them.

The scale of the demolition is reportedly significant, with local officials estimating that a total of 2,500 people are expected to be displaced from approximately 0.35 square kilometers of urban land.

Meanwhile, the city's governor and deputy mayor have confirmed that at least 200 families have already been forced to leave their homes as a result of the demolitions. This number is likely to rise in the coming days as more residents are affected by the ongoing operation.

The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) has stated on social media that it has multiple targets across the West Bank and that its operations will continue for several days. The statement did not provide further details about the scope or nature of the demolitions, but it suggests that the IDF is committed to seeing this operation through to its conclusion.

The practice of demolishing Palestinian homes in the West Bank is a contentious issue, with many Israeli rights groups viewing it as collective punishment. This approach has been criticized for targeting entire communities and families, rather than addressing specific individuals or actions.

The security situation in Hebron remains precarious as Israeli forces continue their demolition operations, leaving many families without homes. This comes at a time of heightened tension in the region, with Israel's general election just days away.

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has been vocal about his commitment to security, and this week he personally visited Hebron to oversee the operation. During his visit, he posted a video on social media showing him wearing protective gear, underscoring the intensity of the situation.

Netanyahu also announced that plans for a major military operation in the West Bank are being reviewed, with some speculating that it may be linked to the ongoing Hebron operation. However, no specific details have been provided about the timing or scope of this potential operation.

The Palestinian Authority has called on the international community to take immediate action to prevent further forced displacement and demolition of homes in Hebron. In a statement, they urged "urgent international action that went beyond condemnation" to address the escalating situation.

The demolition of Palestinian homes in Hebron has sparked international concern, but some Israeli officials are calling for further action against the Palestinian Authority (PA). Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich advocates for a campaign in the West Bank similar to those in Gaza and Lebanon.

Hebron's mayor believes the operation is driven by election politics, with Prime Minister Netanyahu and his ministers seeking to secure support from far-right parties and settlers. The mayor's comments come as Israeli forces continue their demolition of Palestinian buildings in Hebron.

The escalating situation has prompted a call for urgent international action that goes beyond mere condemnation, but it remains to be seen whether this will materialize, leaving the fate of the displaced families uncertain.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqd09k1k7532o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The military operations targeted at least 15 towns in the northern West Bank, with Al Jazeera correspondents reporting on the ground. The raids took place in several key cities and towns, including Nablus, Jenin, Tubas, and Qalqilya.

Israeli forces entered Nablus, carrying out arrests and raiding Palestinian homes in the villages of Jalud and Qaryut. Arrests were also reported in Arrabeh and Burqin, both located near Jenin, while Israeli troops entered Tubas and the nearby town of Aqqaba.

In Hebron, a three-storey building was demolished by Israeli bulldozers, with families given just five minutes to collect their belongings. The authorities have also ordered hundreds of Palestinian families in the Ein Deir Bahha area of Hebron and its surroundings to evacuate their homes under threat of force.

Israeli troops have surrounded the home of one suspect linked to a recent shooting attack in Hebron, where two Israeli soldiers were killed. The raid is part of an ongoing operation that has seen forces sweep through various areas across the West Bank. In addition to Hebron, other locations are being targeted by Israeli forces in what they describe as a multi-day operation.

Further east, Jericho and the nearby Aqabat Jabr refugee camp have been entered by Israeli forces, adding to the growing number of areas under military control. The lockdown imposed on the West Bank is expected to severely restrict movement for millions of Palestinians, with nearly 1,000 checkpoints and gates set to be closed.

The order to implement this lockdown was given by Netanyahu on Friday, shortly after a statement from the Israeli military confirmed that two Palestinian gunmen had been killed in an attack near the settlement of Telem. According to reports, at least three Israeli soldiers were injured alongside the two who lost their lives.

The timing of these events is significant, as they coincide with heightened tensions across the West Bank. The rising aggression has seen violent incidents escalate, including attacks on Palestinian olive harvesters ahead of Israel's upcoming elections on Tuesday.

Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir has called for full control of the West Bank, a move that echoes the Israeli government's efforts to expand settlements in the area.

The closure measures have effectively turned cities and villages into isolated "small prisons", according to Mustafa Barghouti, secretary-general of the Palestinian National Initiative. Checkpoints and gates restrict access to essential services like healthcare, economy, and education. This collective punishment is likely to escalate tensions further.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/24/israel-raids-towns-detains-dozens-of-palestinians-in-occupied-west-bank?traffic_source=rss

The girl, Hind Rajab, lost her life in 2026, and Tlaib is now urging the US to investigate the role of Israeli soldier Sean Glass in her death. According to reports, Glass is currently in the United States.

Tlaib emphasized that as a signatory to international conventions on human rights, the US has a duty to hold individuals accountable for war crimes. She pointed out that this includes investigating and arresting those responsible for such acts, in this case, Glass.

As part of her efforts to raise awareness about this issue, Tlaib shared a report from the Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF), which tracks Israeli soldiers suspected of committing war crimes in Gaza. The group has reportedly filed an emergency request with the US Department of Justice to arrest Glass.

The HRF's investigation found that Glass commanded an Israeli military unit called "Vampire Empire" and was present near the scene of Hind Rajab's death, along with his troops.

The killing of five-year-old Hind Rajab on January 29, 2024, sparked widespread outrage over Israel's treatment of Palestinian civilians and children during its military campaign in Gaza. The incident occurred when Rajab's family was attempting to leave Gaza City, but their vehicle came under Israeli fire instead.

Rajab herself called emergency services, pleading for help as she desperately tried to escape the chaos. Tragically, both she and the rescue team that responded were ultimately killed by Israeli forces. This horrific sequence of events has been extensively documented through recordings of Rajab's telephone call with emergency services.

The aftermath of the incident saw a thorough investigation conducted by Forensic Architecture, which concluded that there was no evidence to suggest an exchange of fire between Israeli and Palestinian fighters at the time of the incident. The findings instead pointed to the presence of only Israeli forces in the area, contradicting initial claims made by Israeli authorities that the car had been involved in a firefight with Palestinian fighters.

The sheer scale of the violence can be seen in the aftermath of the shooting, where the vehicle Rajab was in was found to have sustained an astonishing 335 bullet holes.

The investigation into the killings of Hind Rajab and others in Gaza has been launched by Israel, but many Palestinians view such probes as a way for the government to avoid accountability and shift attention away from its actions.

Human rights organizations, including those within the United Nations, have condemned Israel's military operations in Gaza, labeling them a genocide due to the devastating impact on Palestinian civilians. The loss of life has been staggering, with at least 74,000 Palestinians killed, among them over 21,000 children who should have had a future.

The US government has continued to provide diplomatic, military, and financial support to Israel despite growing evidence of war crimes committed by Israeli forces in Gaza and other areas. Furthermore, the US has criticized the International Criminal Court for seeking to hold Israeli leaders accountable for their actions, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/20/rashida-tlaib-demands-arrest-of-israeli-soldier-linked-to-hind-rajab-death?traffic_source=rss

The incident occurred on October 16 in Khirbet Abu Falah, northeast of Ramallah, where veteran Washington Post photographer Heidi Levine was left with serious injuries despite wearing a clearly marked press vest.

According to Al Jazeera's investigation, verified footage shows a coordinated attack by masked settlers, who were not intervened upon by nearby Israeli military vehicles.

The Israeli government has offered conflicting accounts of the incident, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office questioning whether Israeli settlers were responsible at all. The Israeli army has suggested that its forces were engaged in addressing a confrontation between Palestinians and settlers.

The Al Jazeera investigation involved monitoring over 20 videos and photos taken by journalists and witnesses on the ground, independently verifying the footage, arranging it chronologically, communicating with local reporters, and mapping key locations.

Geospatial analysis has confirmed the location of the settlers' outpost where the attackers originated, pinpointing it near the Misholash settlement.

The attack on American photojournalist Heidi Levine was mapped at coordinates 32°01’13.5″N 35°18’40.7″E, approximately 455 metres southwest of the outpost and just 120 metres north of a plot of land where Palestinians were picking olives when they came under assault.

Rooms traditionally used by Palestinian farmers to store fertiliser and agricultural tools are located near the outpost, with one situated 430 metres northeast and another 500 metres northeast of the attack site. These rooms have been taken over by settlers who now use them as a gathering point.

A local journalist, speaking on condition of anonymity due to security concerns, revealed that Palestinian owners can no longer access these rooms, which are located in Area B under the Oslo Accords where Israel retains security control and the Palestinian Authority manages civil affairs.

The journalist noted that while only a few settlers typically reside at the outpost, during any incident 50 to 100 settlers from other outposts gather there before descending on the fields. Other settler tents on an adjacent mountain overlooking the village serve as additional gathering points for attacks on olive harvesters.

The events leading up to the attack on Heidi Levine unfolded gradually, as footage shows a series of movements by settlers in the area.

A 4x4 vehicle carrying settlers arrived at the site around 8am, followed closely by six motorcycles heading towards the opposite side of the harvesters. Approximately an hour later, a video captured nearly 30 settlers gathering near the farmers, marking a significant escalation of tensions.

The presence of Israeli military vehicles in the area seemed to have little deterrent effect on the settlers. Al Jazeera correspondent Tharwat Shaqra reported that these vehicles passed through the area, after which the settlers proceeded towards the journalists and farmers as if emboldened by their passage.

As the settlers advanced, they began setting fire to olive trees, prompting a response from village youths who threw stones in an attempt to push them back. This confrontation ultimately led to the assault on Levine.

The subsequent footage shows the aftermath of the attack, with Levine being knocked down and her colleagues unable to reach her until young Palestinians intervened by throwing stones at the settlers, creating a temporary barrier that allowed Levine's colleagues to pull her away.

The same video footage captured the sound of six gunshots in total, which Tharwat Shaqra confirmed were fired by the settlers.

Contrary to initial reports, Israeli forces did not appear on the scene immediately after the attack. Instead, their vehicles were stationed in the settlers' area, and it was only later that soldiers arrived at the site.

The army then proceeded to fire tear gas at the olive harvesters while intercepting an ambulance carrying Abdel Jaber Obeid, a local council member who had been injured.

This sequence of events contradicts the official Israeli narrative of how the confrontation unfolded.

Israeli authorities initially claimed that a violent clash broke out between 200 Arabs and far-left activists on one side, and approximately 40 Israeli youths on the other.

Israeli authorities have maintained that their soldiers were attempting to disperse a violent crowd when they failed to intervene in the attack on Heidi Levine. However, videos and eyewitness accounts contradict this claim, suggesting that military vehicles passed by the settlers without intervening.

The incident sparked international outrage, with the US Ambassador to Israel condemning the attack as a "despicable act of terror" carried out by masked individuals. The ambassador called for those responsible to face severe punishment, stating they should spend years in prison.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/10/19/al-jazeera-investigation-challenges-israeli-account-of-heidi-levine-attack?traffic_source=rss

The incident involved a delegation of envoys from several European countries, including one from Belgium, whose consul general was among those targeted. The Belgian government has since condemned the assault and called for Israel to bring the perpetrators to justice. This demand is part of the broader international community's response to the attack.

The Israeli military, responsible for maintaining law and order in the West Bank, also denounced the violence as "severe and announced an investigation into the incident. However, the office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has cast doubt on what happened, suggesting that it was a deliberate attempt to discredit Israel rather than a genuine act of aggression.

The attack occurred just one day after another group of Palestinians and a Washington Post photographer were injured in a separate assault by settlers in a different village in the West Bank.

The European diplomats visited Taybeh, a predominantly Christian village near Ramallah, on Saturday to assess the situation on the ground.

Their presence came as tensions escalated due to frequent attacks by Israeli settlers against Palestinians trying to harvest their olives, an incident that has become almost daily in recent times.

Video footage captured masked settlers confronting the convoy of diplomats, with reports suggesting stones were thrown at them.

The Israeli government has been swift to condemn the violence that broke out in the West Bank, with Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar calling it unfortunate that the diplomats' visit was not coordinated with the IDF in advance.

Sa'ar emphasized that such coordination could have helped ensure the security of the visiting dignitaries. However, he did not shy away from condemning the actions of those responsible for the violence, labeling them as Israeli rioters.

The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) also weighed in on the incident, stating that they strongly condemn the severe act of violence perpetrated against the diplomats. In a preliminary inquiry, the IDF reported that no soldiers were present at the scene when the attack occurred.

Netanyahu's office has urged caution before drawing conclusions from reports about the incident, suggesting that images shared on social media do not provide a complete picture of what happened.

A French official, identified as Bernard Baudoux, was among the diplomats attacked by Israeli settlers in the West Bank.

The mayor of Aulnoye-Aymeries in northern France, who spoke to AFP, described the attack as a stark illustration of Israel's right-wing government turning a blind eye to settler violence. He claimed that the settlers arrived at the scene completely enraged" and proceeded to assault him with iron bars.

The brutal nature of the attack has left many shocked, with the mayor emphasizing that those who continue to suffer the most are the Palestinians living in the region.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c962ydpmjm3zo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Palestinian civilians were attacked by Israeli settlers in Ma'in village, part of the Masafer Yatta area south of Hebron, resulting in six people being injured. Among those hurt were four women and a child. The Palestine Red Crescent Society reported these incidents.

The violence also extended to other areas, including Deir Ammar west of Ramallah. There, Israeli forces opened fire on Palestinian farmers who were picking olives from their land, forcing them to abandon their work. This action was documented by the Palestinian news agency Wafa.

Further south in Tuqu, southeast of Bethlehem, Israeli settlers shot and injured two Palestinians. Additionally, a vehicle carrying a Palestinian civilian was targeted with gunfire by Israeli forces.

The village of Kafr Malek northeast of Ramallah has also been affected, as Mayor Najeh Rustum stated that about 20 sheep were killed during a settler raid on a farm at dawn. This attack occurred after Israeli forces had raided the village the previous night, firing tear gas canisters that ignited a fire and caused damage to a house.

Israeli forces and settlers have been blocking farmers from harvesting their crops in several areas of the occupied West Bank. In Deir Jarir, east of Ramallah, settlers under army protection fired live ammunition at farmers to prevent them from completing the harvest and forced them off their land.

In Burqa near Ramallah, Israeli forces and settlers prevented farmers from picking olives, allegedly citing security concerns. However, eyewitnesses claim that this is merely a pretext for seizing control of Palestinian farmland. The situation has been escalating in recent weeks.

The frequency and brazenness of these attacks have increased significantly since October, with over 300 documented incidents so far. This surge in violence has had severe consequences for Palestinian farmers, who rely heavily on the current harvest season to sustain their livelihoods.

The settlers' actions are often accompanied by military forces, which intervene to protect the settlers and attack Palestinians defending their land. The Israeli government's stance on these attacks remains ambiguous, leaving many questions about its role in perpetuating this cycle of violence.

A recent religious edict issued by Rabbi Dov Lior has been cited as an inspiration for some of these attacks. As a leading authority among radical settler groups, his influence is significant, and his words have contributed to the emboldening of settlers who are increasingly taking matters into their own hands.

The edict issued by Lior emphasizes that harvesting olives in the Holy Land is permissible under Jewish law and carries additional spiritual significance due to security concerns. He also stated that Jews are allowed to harvest olives even in areas far from their communities as a way to assert ownership of the land and fulfill God's commandment to conquer it.

Lior's claims have been met with criticism, particularly regarding his assertion that Palestinians do not own or rent the land, but rather are merely temporary inhabitants. In response, Odeh has accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of downplaying the severity of these incidents and failing to take concrete action to stop them.

Odeh also noted that many settlers involved in these attacks are well-known and their actions are permitted by politicians who prioritize securing votes over protecting Palestinian rights.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/17/several-palestinians-injured-detained-in-ongoing-west-bank-pogrom?traffic_source=rss

Ronen Bar, who previously headed Shin Bet, Israel's internal security agency, is suing Netanyahu for allegedly lying about his role in the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack that left many dead and injured. The case comes at a critical time ahead of Israel's closely contested October 27 election, where Netanyahu faces stiff competition.

Bar has accused Netanyahu of making baseless accusations against him, claiming that the prime minister was trying to deflect attention from his own alleged responsibility in the attack. In a lengthy court document, Bar maintained that he had warned Netanyahu's military secretary about potential threats on the day of the attack but did not have direct access to the prime minister.

Netanyahu has consistently denied being informed by Bar about the impending assault and has stated that if he had been alerted, he could have potentially prevented the attack. However, Bar disputes this claim, saying that his warnings were ignored, and he was unfairly maligned by Netanyahu's accusations.

Bar's lawsuit emphasizes that Netanyahu made his claims with full knowledge of their inaccuracy, using them as a smokescreen to shift the focus away from his own role in the events leading up to the attack.

The lawsuit filed by Ronen Bar against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to shed light on the events surrounding the October 7 attack.

According to Bar's allegations, Netanyahu's policies over several years had "increased the dangers posed by terrorist organisations in Gaza", making it more likely that such an attack would occur. This contradicts Netanyahu's claims that the attack was a surprise and that he did everything he could to prevent it.

In response to Bar's accusations, Netanyahu issued a statement through his Likud party, questioning whether Bar is "serious" about the allegations. The prime minister also claimed that Bar had access to him at all times and could have called him immediately if there were any concerns about the threat posed by Hamas.

Bar resigned as head of Shin Bet in June 2025 amid controversy over the deadliest attack in Israel's history, but he maintained that he had informed Netanyahu of the threat in advance. He is now seeking three million shekels (about $968,500) in damages from the prime minister for defamation.

Netanyahu's former military secretary, Avi Gil, has come forward with allegations that the prime minister's office falsified records related to October 7, including altering the time of a key phone call. According to Gil, a stenographer was instructed by Netanyahu's chief of staff to change the recorded time of the call from 6:40am local time (03:40GMT) to 6:29am (03:29 GMT).

The attack on October 7, 2023, had devastating consequences for Israel, resulting in the loss of at least 1,221 lives and the taking of 251 Israelis hostage, including the bodies of 44 killed that day.

This tragedy has become a contentious issue in Netanyahu's re-election campaign, with polls showing him in a tight race to stay in power ahead of the October 27 election. Critics have accused him of failing to prevent the bloodshed, and his handling of the crisis has been widely questioned by former staff, government officials, and opposition parties.

The severity of the attack was compounded by the fact that Hamas had been planning it for months, with warnings issued as far back as September 2023 when Egypt's intelligence chief Abbas Kamel flew to Israel to warn security officials in person. Just days before the attack, Kamel reportedly phoned Netanyahu directly to reiterate the threat.

The aftermath of the attack has seen a significant escalation of violence in Gaza, with more than 74,300 people killed by Israeli forces since October 2023 and over 1,400 Gazans killed in Israeli attacks since last year's tentative ceasefire backed by the US.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/14/israels-former-security-chief-sues-netanyahu-for-october-7-defamation?traffic_source=rss

The attack occurred in the Tuffah neighbourhood of northeast Gaza City on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, in central Gaza, az-Zawayda, a four-year-old boy named Osama Ahmed Abed died from wounds sustained during an earlier Israeli attack three weeks ago.

His death brings the total number of Palestinians killed in Gaza since October 7, 2023, to more than 74,382.

The Israeli military's control over Gaza has expanded significantly since October 7, 2023, with nearly two-thirds of the territory now under its control or subject to access restrictions.

According to maps from a leading news organization, this expansion is in stark contrast to the US-backed plan to end the war, which envisioned a gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces. Under that plan, known as the "Yellow Line, Israeli forces were supposed to pull back and allow for further withdrawals.

However, instead of adhering to this plan, Israeli forces have continued to seize more territory, effectively rendering the original agreement obsolete. This has left the Palestinian population in Gaza with limited access to basic necessities and services.

In the occupied West Bank, the situation is equally dire, with reports emerging of a child being wounded by live ammunition in Ramallah and el-Bireh. Several Palestinians were also left suffocating from tear gas used by Israeli forces during the attacks.

Israeli forces have been conducting raids on Palestinian non-governmental organisations and other locations in recent days. The offices of several NGOs were targeted, as well as the courtyard of the Palestine Medical Complex. These actions have raised concerns about Israel's intentions and its treatment of Palestinian rights groups.

Human rights lawyer Muhammad Dahleh has spoken out against Israel's tactics, stating that it uses laws and military orders to shut down Palestinian organisations by labeling them terrorist organisations". This designation is based on privileged evidence that is withheld from the groups and their lawyers. Several such organisations were outlawed in 2021 after Israeli authorities rejected legal objections.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also weighed in on the situation, warning of a potential scenario in which the Palestinian Authority turns against Israel in the West Bank. In a video posted on social media, he stated that Israel will extend its control across the territory and maintain dominance over the region.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/14/israeli-attacks-kill-one-in-gaza-wound-journalists-in-occupied-west-bank?traffic_source=rss

According to sources, the Trump administration views the ICC as an institution that poses a threat to American sovereignty and is determined to "dismantle it. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has accused the court of attempting to prosecute Americans, highlighting what he sees as a major concern for the United States.

The sanctions have been met with strong criticism from the ICC, which describes them as an assault on the rule of law and the fundamental principles of international justice. The court's independence is seen as being under threat, with many fearing that this could set a worrying precedent for other international institutions.

Just hours before the announcement, former ICC judge Navi Pillay was awarded the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of her tireless efforts to promote peace and advance international law. The timing of the award serves as a stark contrast to the US administration's stance on the ICC, highlighting the deep divisions that exist between Washington and other global leaders.

The US decision to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) has sparked a strong reaction from the international community, with UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres describing it as a serious blow to the pursuit of international criminal justice.

Several countries have reaffirmed their support for the ICC, including the UK, Canada, Denmark, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, and the Netherlands. These nations expressed regret and disagreement over the US sanctions, highlighting the court's crucial role in bringing perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide to justice. They also commended the ICC staff for their dedication to supporting victims.

The ICC was established in 2002 with a mandate to prosecute serious international crimes, and currently has 125 member states. However, several major countries remain outside its jurisdiction, including the US, Russia, China, India, and Israel. The US government has expressed concerns about the court's independence and what it sees as threats to American sovereignty.

The Trump administration has been critical of the ICC for investigating past actions of US soldiers in Afghanistan and issuing arrest warrants for Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Despite these grievances, the new sanctions do not require the withdrawal of the ICC warrants as a condition for lifting the measures.

The US has structured the new sanctions to allow other countries to negotiate a possible solution with the ICC, in an effort to address American concerns.

US companies will now be prohibited from providing goods or services to the ICC, including banking and software. This move is seen as a significant escalation of tensions between Washington and The Hague-based court. Rubio's statement suggests that the US sees the sanctions as a means to pressure the ICC into backing down from its threat to prosecute Americans.

The Netherlands, which hosts the ICC in The Hague, is particularly vulnerable to these new measures. Dutch Foreign Minister Tom Berendsen has warned that the sanctions would severely impact the court's ability to function. As a NATO ally of the US, the Netherlands may face pressure from Washington to reconsider its position on the ICC.

Netanyahu has welcomed the move, describing the ICC as not a court but a political body that undermines national sovereignty and threatens law-abiding democracies. In response, the ICC has stated that the sanctions are aimed at disrupting its work and intimidating those who co-operate with it. However, the court remains resolute in its commitment to upholding international justice and will not be deterred by this latest development.

The sanctions imposed by the US on the International Criminal Court (ICC) have sparked outrage from the court's officials. They view these measures as a direct attack on the rule of law and an attempt to undermine the ICC's authority.

The implications of this move are far-reaching, with potential consequences for the court's ability to try cases. According to Professor Ryan Goodman, an expert in international law at New York University, the sanctions could ultimately lead to the release of detainees awaiting trial or judgment.

Among those currently facing trial in The Hague is Rodrigo Duterte, the former president of the Philippines, who is accused of thousands of extrajudicial killings during his war on drugs". His case has been closely watched by human rights advocates and lawmakers around the world.

The US government's decision to impose sanctions on International Criminal Court (ICC) officials has sparked widespread condemnation from human rights advocates and experts.

Among the measures announced by the US are carve-outs that allow the ICC to continue providing services for the detention of high-profile detainees, including former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte. These licenses appear to be aimed at mitigating the impact of the sanctions on detained individuals who may have been brought before the court to face justice. However, experts warn that these concessions may ultimately prove insufficient.

The sanctions are set to have far-reaching consequences for the ICC's ability to conduct fair trials and appeals, potentially even forcing the release of detainees as a matter of law.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj20vkkx3rdvo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

The 96-year-old rabbi, Dov Lando, made the remarks in a video recording recently released to the public. In it, he suggests that the ideology of Zionism has led to "disasters for the Jewish people and implies that they may have been better off without a state.

Lando's comments have not gone unnoticed by Israeli politicians, with elections scheduled to take place soon. The role of ultra-Orthodox parties in these elections is likely to be significant, particularly given their stance on military service.

Dov Lando is the leader of Israel's Lithuanian-style ultra-Orthodox community and heads a yeshiva in Bnei Brak. Born in Poland, he was raised in this traditional Jewish tradition before moving to Israel.

Lando holds influential positions within his community, serving as a member of Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah and the spiritual leader of Degel HaTorah party, which is part of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition through its alliance with United Torah Judaism.

Israeli media has released a video of Rabbi Dov Lando making critical comments about Zionism and military service. The remarks were made over a year ago but have recently come to light.

In the video, Lando is heard criticizing Zionism for causing Arabs to hate Jews, bringing physical and spiritual disasters" on the Jewish people. He suggests that living alongside Arabs without a state would be preferable, and even implies that international or Palestinian rule could have been beneficial for Jews.

Lando also targets soldiers who adhere to Religious Zionism, saying they are often killed because their rabbis teach them a distorted version of Torah. He argues that many military operations are carried out not to save lives but to maintain the state's honor.

The rabbi's comments have sparked intense criticism from Israeli politicians, including those part of an opposition alliance challenging Prime Minister Netanyahu.

The backlash against Rabbi Dov Lando's comments has grown, with leading Israeli politicians condemning his views as anti-Zionist and even anti-Semitic.

Gadi Eisenkot, leader of the Yashar party, described Lando's statements as a manifestation of anti-Zionism, while Yair Lapid, head of Israel's opposition in the Knesset, deemed them a shameful reflection on every Jew. Naftali Bennett, former Prime Minister and leader of the Together alliance, echoed similar sentiments, calling Lando's remarks anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist, as well as detrimental to the Israeli military.

The criticism comes after Netanyahu publicly denounced Rabbi Lando's earlier comments in July, when he accused the Religious Zionism movement of inciting murder by supporting the conscription of religious seminary students into the military. This move has further strained relationships within the coalition government, with members of the anti-Netanyahu opposition bloc now calling for the United Torah Judaism (UTJ) party to be excluded from any future government.

The UTJ is a key partner in Netanyahu's current administration, and some have accused him of prioritizing his own political survival over more pressing issues like Zionism and equality in military service. This criticism has been echoed by Yair Golan, leader of the Democrats party, who claims that Netanyahu remains silent on Lando's comments because he relies on the rabbi's party for his government to function.

Breaking with the United Torah Judaism (UTJ) party would be a heavy blow for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose coalition is already struggling to stay ahead in the upcoming election on October 27.

According to recent polls, UTJ is projected to win 8 seats in parliament, which could significantly impact Netanyahu's ability to form a majority government.

The UTJ's influence has been highlighted by Ehab Jabareen, a researcher on Israeli affairs, who notes that if Netanyahu were to criticize Rabbi Lando forcefully, he would risk alienating the ultra-Orthodox community that is essential for his coalition.

This would give his opponents valuable ammunition to use against him in the election campaign, particularly among right-wing voters.

Al Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/10/9/who-is-dov-lando-the-israeli-rabbi-criticising-zionism?traffic_source=rss

The incident occurred when the co-pilot attempted to take control of the plane using a crash axe, but passengers intervened, overpowering him and regaining control of the aircraft. The crew was able to safely land the plane in Tel Aviv despite the disturbance.

According to reports, Hamam al-Hammami is the name given by multiple media outlets to the co-pilot involved in the incident. An investigation into the incident is also underway in the UAE, with prosecutors there looking into possible motives behind the attack.

Australian authorities have confirmed they are investigating links between the country and the co-pilot, stating that their probe involves state police and security agencies.

Australian authorities are now looking into whether the co-pilot, who has been identified as an Omani national by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was radicalized in Australia. This new development comes as part of a broader investigation into the incident.

The investigation is being carried out in collaboration with state police and security agencies, according to Australian authorities. Meanwhile, the UAE's attorney general, Hamad Saif Al Shamsi, has confirmed that investigations are underway to determine the circumstances surrounding the attack on the pilot.

The flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv was carrying over 170 passengers when it made an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia after being attacked by its co-pilot. The plane plummeted 17,000ft (5,200m) mid-air before the reserve pilots managed to land it safely.

The pilot, Capt Smit Machchhar, has described how he was left injured on the floor of the cockpit when he realized the plane was in danger and acted quickly to open an emergency door. This allowed passengers to escape as the plane sank.

Investigations into the tragic incident have uncovered disturbing information about the co-pilot's intentions.

According to reports from the country's state news agency, the co-pilot attempted to carry out a "terrorist act", sparking further scrutiny of his actions on board the plane.

This revelation comes as more details emerge about the co-pilot's past employment history, which has raised concerns over his suitability for the role.

The co-pilot had previously worked at Oman Air, where he was removed from flight training due to concerns over his radical views. He was subsequently given another role within the airline.

In addition to this, it is known that the co-pilot was studying aviation management on a distance-learning course run by Buckinghamshire New University in the UK, graduating with a degree in 2023.

BBC News World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cxly4nym57q9o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss